Methane emissions from Australian livestock: implications of the Kyoto Protocol

Human activities have increased the atmospheric concentration of methane by about 140% since pre- industrial times. The accumulation of methane and other egreenhousei gases is anticipated to cause significant climate changes in the future. Ruminant livestock are the largest producers of methane in Australia and this source constitutes about 12% of the national net emissions. Australia is a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol, which, if it comes into force, requires limiting annual emissions during the period 2008n2012 to 8% over the 1990 value. Australian livestock emissions are projected to increase by 7% by 2010 with total Australian emissions expected to increase by 28n43%. Emissions per unit GDP are higher for the livestock sector than for most other sectors and this may neg- atively affect the sector if free market emission trading is implemented and no new technologies to reduce emis- sions cost-effectively are introduced. Using information from the National Greenhouse Gas Inventory, we demonstrate that reductions in emissions per unit product are already occurring in at least one Australian livestock industry and discuss ways to ensure that similar future changes will be recorded. Cautionary notes are made regard- ing options of grain feeding and more intensive production, which appear to be attractive but may lead to increas- ing emissions when viewed on a broader basis. The potential for increased animal production with new technologies developed to reduce methane emissions suggests that there may be significant opportunities for the Australian live- stock industries arising from the issue of greenhouse gas reductions. Opportunities to establish carbon sinks are also discussed. We suggest that addressing reduction of emissions per hectare rather than per head or per kilo of product results in a strong alignment with the development of more sustainable livestock industries.

[1]  S.Mark Howden,et al.  Evaluating options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from an Australian temperate wheat cropping system , 1997 .

[2]  M. Lenzen Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input–output analysis , 1998 .

[3]  D. Race,et al.  Socio-economic considerations for regional farm forestry development , 1997 .

[4]  D. Shaw,et al.  The use of monensin in European pasture cattle , 1980 .

[5]  J. G. McIvor,et al.  Dry tropical rangelands: solving one problem and creating another , 1990 .

[6]  C. Oldham,et al.  Animal production from tagasaste growing in deep sands in a 450 mm winter rainfall zone , 1991 .

[7]  J. Clapperton,et al.  Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants , 1965, British Journal of Nutrition.

[8]  J. J. Mott,et al.  Estimating Safe Carrying Capacities of Extensive Cattle-Grazing Properties Within Tropical, Semi-Arid Woodlands of North-Eastern Australia. , 1994 .

[9]  R. Rasmussen,et al.  Atmospheric methane at Cape Meares: Analysis of a high‐resolution data base and its environmental implications , 1993 .

[10]  V. Fellner,et al.  Methane output and lactation response in Holstein cattle with monensin or unsaturated fat added to the diet. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[11]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. , 1996 .

[12]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Potential of various fatty feeds to reduce methane release from rumen fermentation in vitro (Rusitec) , 1998 .

[13]  S. Howden,et al.  Methods for exploring management options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from tropical grazing systems , 1994 .

[14]  J. Cayley,et al.  Effects of breed, season of lambing and fecundity level on production per ewe and per hectare , 1991 .

[15]  L. Mannetje Harry Stobbs Memorial Lecture 1994, Potential and prospects of legume-based pastures in the tropics. , 1997 .