Use of BI-RADS lesion descriptors in computer-aided diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions

The purpose of this study was to determine whether combining an automated computer technique that classifies calcifications in mammograms as malignant or benign with radiologist-provided BI-RADS lesion description improves classification performance. Three expert mammography radiologists who were MQSA certified and familiar with BI-RADS retrospectively interpreted 125 cases of mammograms containing calcifications and provided BI-RADS lesion descriptions. A computer technique was applied to the mammograms to extract eight image features that describe the size, shape, and uniformity of individual as well as groups of calcifications. We compared the performance of artificial neural networks that estimated the likelihood of malignancy based on input from either the computer-extracted image features alone, the BI-RADS lesion descriptors alone, or the combination of both. The leave-one-out method was used. Combining the BI-RADS lesion description provided by a single radiologist and computer-extracted image features resulted in improved performance. However, using two radiologists' BI-RADS lesion descriptions such that one radiologist's data was used to train and another radiologist's data was used to test the neural network diminished this improvement in performance. These results suggest that variability in radiologists' BI-RADS lesion description is large enough to offset a potential gain in performance from combining it with an automated computer technique.

[1]  K. Doi,et al.  Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. , 2001, Radiology.

[2]  J. Swets,et al.  Enhanced interpretation of diagnostic images. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[3]  C. Floyd,et al.  Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  G A de Kort,et al.  Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification. , 1996, Radiology.

[5]  M. Giger,et al.  Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification. , 1996, Radiology.

[6]  M. Giger,et al.  Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[7]  N. Petrick,et al.  Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. , 1999, Radiology.

[8]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Comparison of BI-RADS Lesion Descriptors and Computer-Extracted Image Features for Automated Classification of Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions , 2003 .

[9]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experienced breast imagers at mammography? , 2002, Radiology.

[10]  M. Giger,et al.  Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms. , 2002, Radiology.