Know what I mean? Enhancing student understanding of assessment standards and criteria

In recent years there has been an increasing emphasis in higher education on the explicit articulation of assessment standards and requirements, whether this emanates from calls for public accountability or is based on ideas of good educational practice (Ecclestone, 2001). We argue in this article that a single‐minded focus on explicit articulation, whilst currently the dominant logic of higher education, will inevitably fall short of providing students and staff with meaningful knowledge of standards and criteria. Inherent difficulties in the explicit verbal description of standards and criteria make a compelling argument for the consideration of the role of structured processes that support the effective transfer of both explicit and tacit assessment knowledge. With reference to both empirical evidence and the literature, we propose a conceptual framework for the transfer of knowledge of assessment criteria and standards that encompasses a spectrum of tacit and explicit processes, which has proven to be effective in practice in improving student performance.

[1]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[2]  Ann L. Cunliffe,et al.  Reflexive Dialogical Practice in Management Learning , 2002 .

[3]  Lisa Lucas,et al.  Maintaining Standards in higher education?: as case study , 1998 .

[4]  Richard Winter.  The Problem of Educational Levels, Part II: A New Framework for Credit Accumulation in Higher Education , 1994 .

[5]  Kathryn Ecclestone,et al.  'I know a 2:1 when I see it': Understanding criteria for degree classifications in franchised university programmes , 2001 .

[6]  Undergraduate Degree Awards in Teacher Education: constant standards in a changing context , 1996 .

[7]  Stephen Merry,et al.  The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback when Using Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment , 2002 .

[8]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Ten principles of knowledge management and four case studies , 1997 .

[9]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  What is Organizational Knowledge , 2001 .

[10]  Effie Maclellan,et al.  Assessment for Learning: The differing perceptions of tutors and students , 2001 .

[11]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[12]  P. Knight,et al.  Assessing learners in higher education , 1998 .

[13]  Lorraine Stefani,et al.  Comparison of collaborative self, peer and tutor assessment in a biochemistry practical , 1992 .

[14]  Patrick Smith,et al.  The Trouble with Learning Outcomes , 2002 .

[15]  P. Baumard.  Tacit Knowledge in Organizations , 1999 .

[16]  Dick Stenmark,et al.  Leveraging Tacit Organizational Knowledge , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[18]  Mantz Yorke,et al.  Mark Distributions and Marking Practices in UK Higher Education , 2000 .

[19]  Mark N. K. Saunders,et al.  THE USE OF ASSESSMENT CRITERIA TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY OF MARKING , 1998 .

[20]  Chris Rust,et al.  The experience of introducing a common criteria assessment grid across an academic department , 1999 .

[21]  Frank Webster,et al.  Assessing the Undergraduate Dissertation , 2000 .

[22]  Valentina Klenowski,et al.  Creating Communities of Shared Practice: The challenges of assessment use in learning and teaching , 2002 .

[23]  D. Bligh.  Learning to teach in higher education , 1993 .

[24]  D. Royce Sadler,et al.  Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards , 1987 .

[25]  Donald Laming,et al.  The Reliability of a Certain University Examination Compared with the Precision of Absolute Judgements , 1990 .

[26]  Richard Freeman,et al.  Planning and Implementing Assessment , 1998 .

[27]  Lorna Unwin,et al.  The Problem of Educational Levels, Part II: A New Framework for Credit Accumulation in Higher Education , 1994 .

[28]  P. Orsmond,et al.  The Importance of Marking Criteria in the Use of Peer Assessment , 1996 .

[29]  Chris Rust,et al.  The Student Experience of Criterion-Referenced Assessment (Through the Introduction of a Common Criteria Assessment Grid) , 2001 .

[30]  Chris Rust,et al.  Improving Students' Learning by Developing their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes , 2003 .

[31]  J. Spender.  Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory , 1996 .