Initial Outcomes from a Multicenter Study Utilizing the Indego Powered Exoskeleton in Spinal Cord Injury.

Objective: To assess safety and mobility outcomes utilizing the Indego powered exoskeleton in indoor and outdoor walking conditions with individuals previously diagnosed with a spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective observational cohort study in outpatient clinics associated with 5 rehabilitation hospitals. A convenience sample of nonambulatory individuals with SCI (N = 32) completed an 8-week training protocol consisting of walking training 3 times per week utilizing the Indego powered exoskeleton in indoor and outdoor conditions. Participants were also trained in donning/doffing the exoskeleton during each session. Safety measures such as adverse events (AEs) were monitored and reported. Time and independence with donning/doffing the exoskeleton as well as walking outcomes to include the 10-meter walk test (10MWT), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Timed Up & Go test (TUG), and 600-meter walk test were evaluated from midpoint to final evaluations. Results: All 32 participants completed the training protocol with limited device-related AEs, which resulted in no interruption in training. The majority of participants in this trial were able to don and doff the Indego independently. Final walking speed ranged from 0.19 to 0.55 m/s. Final average indoor and outdoor walking speeds among all participants were 0.37 m/s (SD = 0.08, 0.09, respectively), after 8 weeks of training. Significant (p < .05) improvements were noted between midpoint and final gait speeds in both indoor and outdoor conditions. Average walking endurance also improved among participants after training. Conclusion: The Indego was shown to be safe for providing upright mobility to 32 individuals with SCIs who were nonambulatory. Improvements in speed and independence were noted with walking in indoor and outdoor conditions as well as with donning/doffing the exoskeleton.

[1]  R. Marino,et al.  The Reproducibility and Convergent Validity of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[2]  Scott Tanner,et al.  Update on Distance and Velocity Requirements for Community Ambulation , 2010, Journal of geriatric physical therapy.

[3]  Monica A. Gorassini,et al.  Retraining walking over ground in a powered exoskeleton after spinal cord injury: a prospective cohort study to examine functional gains and neuroplasticity , 2019, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  Sue Ann Sisto,et al.  Are the 10 Meter and 6 Minute Walk Tests Redundant in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury? , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  M. Jäger,et al.  Big Data und maschinelles Lernen bei Prävention und Rehabilitation , 2018, Der Orthopäde.

[6]  Pierre Asselin,et al.  Assessment of In-Hospital Walking Velocity and Level of Assistance in a Powered Exoskeleton in Persons with Spinal Cord Injury. , 2015, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[7]  David Putrino,et al.  Robotic Rehabilitation and Spinal Cord Injury: a Narrative Review , 2018, Neurotherapeutics.

[8]  Caitlin Hurd,et al.  Perspectives of people with spinal cord injury learning to walk using a powered exoskeleton , 2019, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[9]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[10]  J J Eng,et al.  A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury , 2008, Spinal Cord.

[11]  Clare Hartigan,et al.  Acute Cardiorespiratory and Metabolic Responses During Exoskeleton-Assisted Walking Overground Among Persons with Chronic Spinal Cord Injury. , 2015, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[12]  Pierre Asselin,et al.  Heart rate and oxygen demand of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in persons with paraplegia. , 2015, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  A. J. van Dijk,et al.  Life satisfaction of persons with spinal cord injury compared to a population group. , 1998, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[14]  M. Devivo,et al.  Predictors of life satisfaction: a spinal cord injury cohort study. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  Hugo A. Quintero,et al.  A Powered Lower Limb Orthosis for Providing Legged Mobility in Paraplegic Individuals. , 2011, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[16]  M. Molinari,et al.  Validity and reliability of the 10-m walk test and the 6-min walk test in spinal cord injury patients , 2011, Spinal Cord.

[17]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  The ReWalk Powered Exoskeleton to Restore Ambulatory Function to Individuals with Thoracic-Level Motor-Complete Spinal Cord Injury , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[18]  Clare Hartigan,et al.  Mobility Outcomes Following Five Training Sessions with a Powered Exoskeleton. , 2015, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[19]  Subashan Perera,et al.  Improvements in Speed-Based Gait Classifications Are Meaningful , 2007, Stroke.

[20]  C. Schusterschitz,et al.  Dual task interference in estimating the risk of falls and measuring change: a comparative, psychometric study of four measurements , 2010, Clinical rehabilitation.

[21]  K. Anderson Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. , 2004, Journal of neurotrauma.

[22]  Richard W. Bohannon Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. , 1997, Age and ageing.