Assessing the safety of schools affected by geo-hydrologic hazards: The geohazard safety classification (GSC)

Abstract Three-quarters of the world population suffered natural disasters at least once between 1980 and 2000. Furthermore, last years' chronicles showed us several geological events that repededly affected urban landscapes. As a consequence beside the loss of human lives and environmental degradation, lots of students were excluded from school, many of whom never to return. Natural hazards have physical, educational, economic and psychosocial impacts. Nowadays it is well ascertained that to decrease this impact by means of structural interventions requires considerable economic resources. Nevertheless, the comparision consequences of similar events in different contexts, it emerges that risk awareness of the population and education to emergency procedures have a positive impact on the occurrence of victims. It follows that the ability of school occupants exposed to hazards to resist and recover from the effects of a hazard in a timely and efficient manner plays a key role to reduce risk, moreover resulting in a cheaper and faster strategy of intervention.This paper presents a new cost-effective methodology and procedure to rapidly assess the geohazard safety classification (GSC) of schools and provides useful information to local decision makers. The GSC, based on the concepts of hazard, vulnerability and resilience, can be calculated integrating ancillary data by means of rapid and not invasive field surveys and questionnaires distributed to the schools employees. Moreover, it can be easily read and understand since it uses the same type of scale as energy efficiency, to indicate the occupants' safety in case of adverse events related to geo-hydrologic hazards.This new rapid assessment methodology have been tested on 10 schools in Tuscany (Italy) and the present paper shows how the GSC can be strongly affected by the lack of ancillary information or the incompleteness of the Risk Assessment Document as well as the school occupants poor perception of geo-hydrologic risk. However, this limitation is at the same time one of the strengths of the GSC: investing in education is a cost-effective way to increase substantially the GSC.

[1]  Ermanno G. Grinzato,et al.  Quantitative infrared thermography in buildings , 1998 .

[2]  Fabio Rocca,et al.  Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  Jun Saita,et al.  DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF LEANING TOWER OF PISA USING MICROTREMOR:PRELIMINARY RESULTS , 1999 .

[4]  S. Cutter.  Vulnerability to environmental hazards , 1996 .

[5]  Shu-Li Huang,et al.  Assessing urban flooding vulnerability with an emergy approach , 2015 .

[6]  Michael Forde,et al.  Application of infrared thermography to the non-destructive testing of concrete and masonry bridges , 2003 .

[7]  Alfredo Mahar A Lagmay,et al.  Science guides search and rescue after the 2006 Philippine landslide. , 2008, Disasters.

[8]  Nicola Casagli,et al.  Localising deformation along the elevation of linear structures: An experiment with space-borne InSAR and RTK GPS on the Roman Aqueducts in Rome, Italy , 2015 .

[9]  Y Nakamura,et al.  A METHOD FOR DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS ESTIMATION OF SUBSURFACE USING MICROTREMOR ON THE GROUND SURFACE , 1989 .

[10]  Rocco Ditommaso,et al.  Effect of a single vibrating building on free-field ground motion: numerical and experimental evidences , 2010 .

[11]  Maria Rosaria Gallipoli,et al.  Structure, soil-structure response and effects of damage based on observations of horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios of microtremors , 2004 .

[12]  Francesca Cigna,et al.  Multi-temporal mapping of land subsidence at basin scale exploiting Persistent Scatterer Interferometry: case study of Gioia Tauro plain (Italy) , 2012 .

[13]  Antonia Moropoulou,et al.  Applications of infrared thermography for the investigation of historic structures , 2004 .

[14]  E. Barreira,et al.  Evaluation of building materials using infrared thermography , 2007 .

[15]  Debarati Guha-Sapir,et al.  Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2009The numbers and trends , 2010 .

[16]  Constantinos A. Balaras,et al.  Infrared thermography for building diagnostics , 2002 .

[17]  Nicola Casagli,et al.  3-D geomechanical rock mass characterization for the evaluation of rockslide susceptibility scenarios , 2014, Landslides.

[18]  J. Warburton,et al.  Applications of differential GPS in upland fluvial geomorphology , 1999 .

[19]  Lee S. Bosher,et al.  Disaster risk reduction or disaster risk production: the role of building regulations in mainstreaming DRR , 2015 .

[20]  François Peyret,et al.  High-precision application of GPS in the field of real-time equipment positioning , 2000 .

[21]  F. Mulargia,et al.  The Effect of Velocity Inversions on H/V , 2009 .

[22]  D. Varnes.  Landslide hazard zonation: A review of principles and practice , 1984 .

[23]  Thomas H. Heaton,et al.  The Observed Wander of the Natural Frequencies in a Structure , 2006 .

[24]  Mark Albert H. Zarco,et al.  Catastrophic rockslide-debris avalanche at St. Bernard, Southern Leyte, Philippines , 2007 .

[25]  Samuel J. Ratick,et al.  Assessing the Vulnerability of Coastal Communities to Extreme Storms: The Case of Revere, MA., USA , 1998 .

[26]  M. Fedeski,et al.  Urban sustainability in the presence of flood and geological hazards: the development of a GIS-based vulnerability and risk assessment methodology , 2007 .

[27]  Will Featherstone,et al.  COMBINED ANALYSIS OF REAL-TIME KINEMATIC GPS EQUIPMENT AND ITS USERS FOR HEIGHT DETERMINATION , 2001 .

[28]  Christiane Maierhofer,et al.  Active thermography for evaluation of reinforced concrete structures , 2010 .

[29]  Omar D. Cardona,et al.  The Need for Rethinking the Concepts of Vulnerability and Risk from a Holistic Perspective: A Necessary Review and Criticism for Effective Risk Management , 2013 .

[30]  Samuele Segoni,et al.  Urban planning, flood risk and public policy: The case of the Arno River, Firenze, Italy , 2012 .

[31]  Saehoon Kim,et al.  Are master plans effective in limiting development in China's disaster-prone areas? , 2013 .

[32]  D. J. Allerton,et al.  Book Review: GPS theory and practice. Second Edition, HOFFMANNWELLENHOFF B., LICHTENEGGER H. and COLLINS J., 1993, 326 pp., Springer, £31.00 pb, ISBN 3-211-82477-4 , 1995 .

[33]  Emine N. Caner-Saltik,et al.  In situ assessment of structural timber elements of a historic building by infrared thermography and ultrasonic velocity , 2007 .

[34]  Ian J. Walker,et al.  Understanding vulnerability of coastal communities to climate change related risks , 2004 .

[35]  L. Ermini,et al.  A Cost Effective Methodology for the Rapid Evaluation of the Flood Susceptibility Along Anthropized Rivers , 2015 .

[36]  J. Wasowski,et al.  Detection of directivity in seismic site response from microtremor spectral analysis , 2008 .

[37]  Nicola Casagli,et al.  Analysis of building deformation in landslide area using multisensor PSInSAR™ technique , 2014, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[38]  David Johnston,et al.  Towards disaster resilience: A scenario-based approach to co-producing and integrating hazard and risk knowledge , 2015 .

[39]  Nicola Casagli,et al.  Testing cost-effective methodologies for flood and seismic vulnerability assessment in communities of developing countries (Dajç, northern Albania) , 2016 .