Toward a formal theory of flexible spatial behavior: geometric category biases generalize across pointing and verbal response types.

Three experiments tested whether geometric biases--biases away from perceived reference axes--reported in spatial recall tasks with pointing responses generalized to a recognition task that required a verbal response. Seven-year-olds and adults remembered the location of a dot within a rectangle and then either reproduced its location or verbally selected a matching choice dot from a set of colored options. Results demonstrated that geometric biases generalized to verbal responses; however, the spatial span of the choice set influenced performance as well. These data suggest that the same spatial memory process gives rise to both response types in this task. Simulations of a dynamic field model buttress this claim. More generally, these results challenge accounts that posit separate spatial systems for motor and verbal responses.

[1]  J. Plumert,et al.  The development of memory for location: what role do spatial prototypes play? , 2001, Child development.

[2]  A. Georgopoulos,et al.  Cognitive neurophysiology of the motor cortex. , 1993, Science.

[3]  John P Spencer,et al.  Developmental continuity in the processes that underlie spatial recall , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  H L Pick,et al.  Children's use of frames of reference in communication of spatial location. , 1990, Child development.

[5]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  How Language Structures Space , 1983 .

[6]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The Emergence of Stimulus-Response Associations from Neural Activation Fields: Dynamic Field Theory , 2005 .

[7]  Diane J. Schiano,et al.  Perceptual and conceptual factors in distortions in memory for graphs and maps. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  M. Fahle,et al.  Grasping Visual Illusions: No Evidence for a Dissociation Between Perception and Action , 2000, Psychological science.

[9]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Analysis of visual behavior , 1982 .

[10]  Anne R. Schutte,et al.  Testing the dynamic field theory: working memory for locations becomes more spatially precise over development. , 2003, Child development.

[11]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  The development of hierarchical representation of two-dimensional space. , 1996, Child development.

[12]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[13]  J. Plumert,et al.  The Early Development of Children's Communication about Nested Spatial Relations , 1995 .

[14]  B McCabe,et al.  Memory for locations within regions: Spatial biases and visual hemifield differences , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[15]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  The Coding of Spatial Location in Young Children , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Toddlers' use of metric information and landmarks to reorient. , 2001, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[17]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  The time course of spatial memory distortions , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[18]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children , 1994, Nature.

[19]  Anne R. Schutte,et al.  Unifying Representations and Responses , 2004, Psychological science.

[20]  J. Mandler,et al.  Early Sensitivity to Language-Specific Spatial Categories in English and Korean , 1999 .

[21]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Knowing in the context of acting: the task dynamics of the A-not-B error. , 1999, Psychological review.

[22]  B. Bridgeman Separate visual representations for perception and for visually guided behavior , 1991 .

[23]  John P. Spencer,et al.  An Embodied Approach to Cognitive Systems: A Dynamic Neural Field Theory of Spatial Working Memory , 2006 .

[24]  Robert Cohen,et al.  The Development of spatial cognition , 1985 .

[25]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Visuomotor Transformations for Reaching to Memorized Targets: A PET Study , 1997, NeuroImage.

[26]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Tests of a dynamic systems account of the A-not-B error: the influence of prior experience on the spatial memory abilities of two-year-olds. , 2001, Child development.

[27]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system , 2000, Vision Research.

[28]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Sources of Flexibility in Human Cognition: Dual-Task Studies of Space and Language , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  J E Cutting,et al.  Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Immediate memory for spatial location. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[31]  M. Goodale,et al.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand , 1995, Current Biology.

[32]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  J. Plumert,et al.  Parental Scaffolding of Young Children's Spatial Communication , 1996 .

[34]  Anne R. Schutte,et al.  Generalizing the dynamic field theory of the A-not-B error beyond infancy: three-year-olds' delay- and experience-dependent location memory biases. , 2002, Child development.

[35]  M. Fahle,et al.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  E. Brenner,et al.  Independent movements of the digits in grasping , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  E. Spelke,et al.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation , 1996, Cognition.

[38]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The Effect of Pictorial Illusion on Prehension and Perception , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  N I Durlach,et al.  Evaluation of response methods for the localization of nearby objects , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  T. Bachmann,et al.  Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events (Advances in Psychology, Vol. 129) , 1999 .

[42]  L. Hedges,et al.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. , 1991, Psychological review.

[43]  P. Bloom,et al.  Language and space , 1998 .

[44]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[45]  Nora S. Newcombe,et al.  Infants' coding of location in continuous space. , 1999 .

[46]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Short-Term Memory for Reaching to Visual Targets: Psychophysical Evidence for Body-Centered Reference Frames , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Bias in spatial location due to categorization: comment on Tversky and Schiano. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[48]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory , 1980 .

[49]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Reference-related inhibition produces enhanced position discrimination and fast repulsion near axes of symmetry , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  L. Hermer-Vazquez,et al.  Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans: the case of two spatial memory tasks , 2001, Cognition.

[51]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  T. Regier,et al.  Linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categorization , 2000, Cognition.

[53]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations , 1996 .

[54]  John P Spencer,et al.  Prototypes and particulars: geometric and experience-dependent spatial categories. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[55]  B. Pasamanick The Construction of Reality in the Child , 1955 .

[56]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Robust Spatial Working Memory through Homeostatic Synaptic Scaling in Heterogeneous Cortical Networks , 2003, Neuron.

[57]  Laura A. Carlson-Radvansky,et al.  The Influence of Reference Frame Selection on Spatial Template Construction , 1997 .

[58]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Conceptual precursors to language , 2004, Nature.

[59]  P. Goldman-Rakic Cellular basis of working memory , 1995, Neuron.

[60]  G. Schöner,et al.  Bridging the representational gap in the dynamic systems approach to development , 2003 .

[61]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  A computational perspective on the neural basis of multisensory spatial representations , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[62]  Jack L. Vevea,et al.  Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[63]  Estela Bicho,et al.  Target Representation on an Autonomous Vehicle with Low-Level Sensors , 2000, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[64]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Chapter 1 Separate representations of visual space for perception and visually guided behavior , 1999 .

[65]  Peter M. Vishton,et al.  Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on different behaviors: one- and two-handed grasping; one- and two-handed manual estimation; metric and comparative judgment. , 2003, Spatial vision.

[66]  R. Jackendoff The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface , 1996 .

[67]  E. Thelen,et al.  The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[68]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Synaptic mechanisms and network dynamics underlying spatial working memory in a cortical network model. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[69]  Jodie M Plumert,et al.  Delay-induced bias in children's memory for location. , 2002, Child development.

[70]  Diane J. Schiano,et al.  Structure and strategy in encoding simplified graphs , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[71]  Rich Gossweiler,et al.  Perceiving geographical slant , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.