At present, a large number of theories exist which explain the process for choosing communication media in organizations. Channel expansion theory combines a large part of the theoretical foundation for these theories, suggesting that the perceived richness of a communication medium varies according to experience based on the knowledge of the organization’s members. Equally, Regulatory Focus Theory also suggests that individuals behave in a different way when their self regulation states are different. This investigation intends to present a set of proposals based on the existing literature about how strategy type /focus (promotion and prevention) affects the perception of the richness of a communication medium, increasing the explanatory capacity of channel expansion theory. DOI: 10.4018/ijaie.2012010101 2 International Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering, 1(1), 1-9, January-June 2012 Copyright © 2012, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. spective at one end and theories that emphasize social aspects at the other. The main and most relevant theories on the choice of communication media in organizations are media Richness Theory (Daft & Lengel, 1984, 1986), (Treviño, Lengel, & Daft, 1987), Social Influence Theory (Fulk, Schmitz, & Steinfield, 1990; Schmitz & Fulk, 1991), Critical Mass Theory (Oliver, Marwell, & Teixeira, 1985; Markus, 1990b), Social Presence Theory (Short, Williams, & Christie, 1976), and Channel Expansion Theory (Carlson & Zmud, 1999). This last of these, Channel Expansion Theory, has focused a large number of investigations in recent years (for example: Timmerman & Madhavapeddi, 2008; D’ Urso & Rains, 2008) relating the proposals of theories focused on rational decision making to those of social influence in the organizations. More specifically, Carlson and Zmud (1999) suggest that decisions on the choice of communication media are taken with the perceived richness of the media in mind, which depends partly on experiences based on knowledge. On the other hand, Regulatory Focus Theory (Higgins, 1997) also suggests that individuals behave differently when their self regulation states are different (with a focus on promotion and prevention). Individuals with a high promotion focus show an attitude aimed at maximizing benefits and therefore with a tendency to advance. On the contrary, individuals with a high prevention focus usually show a monitoring state aimed at maximizing safety and therefore with a tendency to avoid losses. The objective of this investigation is to suggest a set of proposals from the existing literature on how the type of strategy/focus (promotion and prevention) affects the perception of richness of a communication media. More specifically, the intention is to propose relations between the four experiences based on knowledge of Channel Expansion Theory and Social Influence with the focuses of Regulatory Focus Theory. Is it Still Necessary to Investigate the Choice of Communication Media in Organizations? Presently, communication technologies play a fundamental role as communication media between members in an organization. Some communication media such as electronic mail and videoconferencing have arrived to a mature stage becoming relatively common elements and “omnipresent in contemporary organizations” (Minsky & Marin, 1999). For this reason, it is practically impossible to consider an organization without communication by means of computer-based technologies (Curls & Gattiker, 2001). Some could argue that this maturity makes the study on the choice of communication through this type of technology as obsolete. However, on the other hand, it is possible to argue that the fact that these technologies and media are now so generalized makes this type of study still more relevant (van den Hooff, Groot, & de Jonge, 2005). Since communication media are an integral part of organizational communication, explaining how they are used and their effects on organizational efficiency give sufficient reasons to support investigation. Roots on Theories on Communication Media Choice Most investigations on organizational communication are based on the theoretical foundations of communication developed in the fields of psychology and sociology. Nevertheless, some authors claim that organizational communication has evolved and matured into an independent discipline to those of social psychology, sociology, administration or anthropology, as demonstrated by its solid trajectory in empirical and practical investigation. The foundations of these areas have served to develop midrange theoretical proposals such as Functional Theory (Gouran & Hirokawa, 1983, 1986, 1996), Structuration Theory (Poole, Seibold, & McPhee, 1996, 1986; Poole & Doelger, 7 more pages are available in the full version of this document, which may be purchased using the "Add to Cart" button on the product's webpage: www.igi-global.com/article/self-regulatory-focus-determinantperceived/62984?camid=4v1 This title is available in InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journals, InfoSci-Journal Disciplines Engineering, Natural, and Physical Science, InfoSci-Operations, Logistics, and Performance Assessment eJournal Collection, InfoSciPhysical Sciences, Biological Sciences, and Engineering eJournal Collection, InfoSci-Select. Recommend this product
[1]
James R. Van Scotter,et al.
The complexity of richness: Media, message, and communication outcomes
,
2008,
Inf. Manag..
[2]
G. Yukl.
Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research
,
1989
.
[3]
Janet Fulk,et al.
Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail
,
1991
.
[4]
Richard L. Daft,et al.
Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design
,
1986
.
[5]
R. Friedman,et al.
The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity.
,
2001,
Journal of personality and social psychology.
[6]
J. Walther.
Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction
,
1992
.
[7]
G. Marwell,et al.
A Theory of the Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action
,
1985,
American Journal of Sociology.
[8]
C. Steinfield,et al.
A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations
,
1987
.
[9]
C.E. Timmerman,et al.
Perceptions of Organizational Media Richness: Channel Expansion Effects for Electronic and Traditional Media Across Richness Dimensions
,
2008,
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.
[10]
E. Higgins.
Beyond pleasure and pain.
,
1997,
The American psychologist.
[11]
Stephen A. Rains,et al.
Examining the Scope of Channel Expansion
,
2008
.
[12]
Dennis S. Gouran,et al.
Functional Theory and Communication in Decision-Making and Problem-Solving Groups: An Expanded View
,
1996
.
[13]
Barbara D. Minsky,et al.
Why Faculty Members Use E-Mail: The Role of Individual Differences in Channel Choice
,
1999
.
[14]
M. Lynne Markus,et al.
Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media
,
1987
.
[15]
John R. Carlson,et al.
Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions
,
1999
.
[16]
R. Daft,et al.
Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design
,
1983
.
[17]
Thomas E. Becker,et al.
Employee commitment and motivation: a conceptual analysis and integrative model.
,
2004,
The Journal of applied psychology.
[18]
C. Steinfield,et al.
A Social Influence Model of Technology use
,
1990
.
[19]
R. Rice.
Media Appropriateness Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Traditional and New Organizational Media
,
1993
.
[20]
R. Rice,et al.
Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction
,
2002
.
[21]
E. G. Bormann.
Symbolic Convergence Theory and Communication in Group Decision Making
,
1996
.
[22]
R. Daft,et al.
Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations
,
1987
.
[23]
E. Higgins.
Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle
,
1998
.
[24]
Huaiqing Wang,et al.
Manufacturing Intelligence for Industrial Engineering: Methods for System Self-organization, Learning, and Adaptation
,
2010
.
[25]
B. van den Hooff,et al.
Situational Influences on the Use of Communication Technologies
,
2005
.
[26]
E. Higgins,et al.
Expectancy × Value Effects: Regulatory Focus as Determinant of Magnitude and Direction
,
1997
.
[27]
R. Kraut,et al.
Varieties of Social Influence: the Role of Utility and Norms in the Success of a New Communication Medium
,
1998
.
[28]
Zinta S. Byrne,et al.
Different Media for Organizational Communication: Perceptions of Quality and Satisfaction
,
2006
.
[29]
E. Higgins,et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article ENJOYING GOAL-DIRECTED ACTION: The Role of Regulatory Fit
,
2022
.
[30]
Marshall Scott Poole,et al.
The structuration of group decisions.
,
1996
.
[31]
N Liberman,et al.
Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: implications for attributional functions.
,
2001,
Journal of personality and social psychology.
[32]
E. Tory Higgins,et al.
Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: the general impact of promotion and prevention.
,
2001,
Journal of personality and social psychology.
[33]
C. Chiu,et al.
The Motivational Function of Regulatory Focus in Creativity
,
2002
.