Accuracy of computed tomography for selecting the revascularization method based on SYNTAX score II

[1]  D. Berman,et al.  SYNTAX Score Derived From Coronary CT Angiography for Prediction of Complex Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. , 2016, Academic radiology.

[2]  S. Pocock,et al.  Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  D. van Klaveren,et al.  Long-term forecasting and comparison of mortality in the Evaluation of the Xience Everolimus Eluting Stent vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization (EXCEL) trial: prospective validation of the SYNTAX Score II. , 2015, European heart journal.

[4]  Sae Rom Hong,et al.  Accuracy of CT for Selecting Candidates for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Combination with the SYNTAX Score. , 2015, Radiology.

[5]  V. Fuster,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of coronary ct for the quantification of the syntax score in patients with left main and/or 3-vessel coronary disease. Comparison with invasive angiography. , 2015, International journal of cardiology.

[6]  M. Bozbay,et al.  The Reliability of Computed Tomography-Derived SYNTAX Score Measurement , 2015, Angiology.

[7]  G. Stone,et al.  Validation and comparison of the long-term prognostic capability of the SYNTAX score-II among 1,528 consecutive patients who underwent left main percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[8]  P. Kolh,et al.  [2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization]. , 2014, Kardiologia polska.

[9]  Suhua Li,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 320-slice computed tomography angiography for detection of coronary artery stenosis: meta-analysis. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.

[10]  W. B. Meijboom,et al.  Diagnostic performance of computed tomography coronary angiography to detect and exclude left main and/or three-vessel coronary artery disease , 2013, European Radiology.

[11]  S. Abadi,et al.  Direct comparison between coronary computed tomography and invasive angiography for calculation of SYNTAX score. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  H. Lee,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography for selecting coronary artery bypass graft surgery candidates. , 2013, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  P. Serruys,et al.  The SYNTAX score and its clinical implications , 2013, Heart.

[14]  P. Serruys,et al.  CT-SYNTAX score: a feasibility and reproducibility Study. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[15]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II , 2013, The Lancet.

[16]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[17]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Coronary CT angiography versus conventional cardiac angiography for therapeutic decision making in patients with high likelihood of coronary artery disease. , 2012, Radiology.

[18]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography indicates complexity of percutaneous coronary interventions. , 2012, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[19]  Helmut Baumgartner,et al.  ESC / EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization , 2014 .

[20]  V. Chair,et al.  ACCF/AHA Practice Guideline 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2011 .

[21]  H. Lee,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for selecting coronary artery bypass graft surgery candidates. , 2011, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[22]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Coronary CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging to detect flow-limiting stenoses: a potential gatekeeper for coronary revascularization? , 2009, European heart journal.

[23]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography or conventional coronary angiography in therapeutic decision-making. , 2008, European heart journal.

[25]  M. Budoff,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Indi , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  H. Bedi,et al.  Can we perform coronary artery bypass grafting on the basis of computed tomographic angiography alone? A comparison with conventional coronary angiography. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[27]  M. Galanski,et al.  High-resolution 64-slice helical-computer-assisted-tomographical-angiography as a diagnostic tool before CABG surgery: the dawn of a new era? , 2007, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[28]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  Estimating and comparing diagnostic tests' accuracy when the gold standard is not binary. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[29]  P. Serruys,et al.  The SYNTAX Score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. , 2005, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[30]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). , 2004, Circulation.