A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin with or without Panitumumab for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: This two-part phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of panitumumab, a fully human anti–epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, combined with carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with previously untreated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. Methods: In part 1, patients were sequentially enrolled to receive paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin (area under the concentration-versus-time curve, 6 mg/min/ml) plus panitumumab (1.0, 2.0, or 2.5 mg/kg). In part 2, patients were randomized 2:1 to receive paclitaxel/carboplatin with (arm A) or without (arm B) the maximum tolerated dose of panitumumab identified in part 1. Primary endpoints in parts 1 and 2 were the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities and time to progression (TTP), respectively. Results: In part 1, four of 19 patients had dose-limiting toxicities: three at 2.0 mg/kg (fatigue, pain in extremity, dyspepsia) and one at 2.5 mg/kg (rash). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached; panitumumab 2.5 mg/kg was selected for part 2. In part 2, TTP was 18.1 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.6−23.3) in arm A and 23.0 weeks (95% CI, 15.9−24.1) in arm B (hazard ratio, 0.9; 90% CI, 0.66−1.21; p = 0.555). Progression-free survival in arms A and B was 17.6 weeks and 18.3 weeks, respectively, and the objective response rate was 15.2% and 11.1%. Adverse events occurring more frequently in arm A than in arm B included skin toxicity, diarrhea, stomatitis, vomiting, and dizziness. Exploratory analyses did not demonstrate associations between potential biomarkers and outcomes. Conclusion: Although toxicity was predictable and manageable, the addition of panitumumab to paclitaxel/carboplatin did not improve TTP in patients with previously untreated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer.

[1]  Masahiro Fukuoka,et al.  Biomarker analyses and final overall survival results from a phase III, randomized, open-label, first-line study of gefitinib versus carboplatin/paclitaxel in clinically selected patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Asia (IPASS). , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  R. Dziadziuszko,et al.  Biomarkers of clinical benefit for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer , 2011, British Journal of Cancer.

[3]  M. Socinski,et al.  Personalized medicine in non-small-cell lung cancer: is KRAS a useful marker in selecting patients for epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy? , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Josep Tabernero,et al.  Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Oncogenic KRAS desensitizes colorectal tumor cells to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition and activation. , 2010, Neoplasia.

[7]  M. Lacouture,et al.  Skin toxicity evaluation protocol with panitumumab (STEPP), a phase II, open-label, randomized trial evaluating the impact of a pre-Emptive Skin treatment regimen on skin toxicities and quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Nicholas Iannotti,et al.  Cetuximab and first-line taxane/carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the randomized multicenter phase III trial BMS099. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  C. Horak,et al.  Analysis of potential predictive markers of cetuximab benefit in BMS099, a phase III study of cetuximab and first-line taxane/carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Edward S. Kim,et al.  Molecular predictors of outcome with gefitinib and docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer: data from the randomized phase III INTEREST trial. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  J. Douillard,et al.  Safety summary of panitumumab (pmab) in combination with chemotherapy (ctx) from four clinical trials in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Robert Pirker,et al.  Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (FLEX): an open-label randomised phase III trial , 2009, The Lancet.

[13]  Lesley Seymour,et al.  Role of KRAS and EGFR as biomarkers of response to erlotinib in National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study BR.21. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  R. Herbst,et al.  Increased EGFR gene copy number detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization predicts outcome in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with cetuximab and chemotherapy. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  William Pao,et al.  Molecular characteristics of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, bronchioloalveolar carcinoma subtype, predict response to erlotinib. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  P. Ellis,et al.  Randomized phase II study of cetuximab plus cisplatin/vinorelbine compared with cisplatin/vinorelbine alone as first-line therapy in EGFR-expressing advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[17]  R. Figlin,et al.  Dose and Schedule Study of Panitumumab Monotherapy in Patients with Advanced Solid Malignancies , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[18]  J. Berlin,et al.  Panitumumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer , 2007, Cancer.

[19]  Marc Peeters,et al.  Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  J. Berlin,et al.  Panitumumab with irinotecan/leucovorin/5-fluorouracil for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2007, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[21]  C. Watkins,et al.  Molecular predictors of outcome with gefitinib in a phase III placebo-controlled study in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  R. Herbst,et al.  Phase I/IIa study of cetuximab with gemcitabine plus carboplatin in patients with chemotherapy-naive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Xin Li,et al.  TRIBUTE: a phase III trial of erlotinib hydrochloride (OSI-774) combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  W. Evans Gefitinib does not improve survival when combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy in people with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2004, Cancer treatment reviews.

[25]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Gefitinib in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial--INTACT 1. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  Roy S Herbst,et al.  Gefitinib in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial--INTACT 2. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  K. O'Byrne,et al.  EGFR expression as a predictor of survival for first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[29]  N. Hanna Phase III Study of Erlotinib in Combination With Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Tarceva Lung Cancer Investigation Trial , 2008 .

[30]  Zhong Wen-zhao,et al.  Erlotinib in Lung Cancer - Molecular and Clinical Predictors of Outcome , 2006 .

[31]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.