An Economic Analysis of Strategic Information Technology Investments

The information systems literature is replete with conceptual frameworks for analyzing strategic applications of information technology (IT). In this article, the strategic impacts of IT investment are studied through the development of a formal economic model. In particular, it focuses on IT-related quality competition in a duopoly, where the services may not be priced initially (e.g., in the financial services sector), and where the benefits may come indirectly (e.g., in the form of interest earned on consumer deposits or float on checking accounts). A firm may have to invest in IT, regardless of its underlying cost structure, as a response to its competitor's investment level. (We analyze the division of technology benefits between the firms and the consumers and study welfare implications for simultaneous and sequential investments.) Both firms prefer sequential over simultaneous investments, even when both have the required technology. While the IT-inefficient firm (one with higher IT cost for a given service quality) has followership incentives, the leadership incentives for the IT-efficient firm depend on the difference in IT cost structures and the degree of substitutability between the services of the two firms. A preliminary treatment of pricing issues is provided in conjunction with consumer switching cost, which not only has a negative impact on consumer welfare but may also reduce total industry profits. For dynamic markets with new consumers, the negative effect of switching cost on th welfare of existing consumers is reduced when the IT-efficient firm moves first.

[1]  D. Levhari,et al.  Market Structure, Quality and Durability , 1973 .

[2]  Jennifer F. Reinganum Dynamic games of innovation , 1981 .

[3]  A. Shaked,et al.  Relaxing price competition through product differentiation , 1982 .

[4]  C. Shapiro,et al.  R&D Rivalry with Licensing or Imitation , 1987 .

[5]  Eytan Sheshinski,et al.  Price, Quality and Quantity Regulation in Monopoly Situations , 1976 .

[6]  Eric K. Clemons MAC-Philadelphia National Bank's strategic venture in shared ATM networks , 1989, [1989] Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume IV: Emerging Technologies and Applications Track.

[7]  Morton I. Kamien,et al.  On the Degree of Rivalry for Maximum Innovative Activity , 1976 .

[8]  F. McFarlan,et al.  Information partnerships--shared data, shared scale. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[9]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  An economic analysis of interorganizational information technology , 1992, Decis. Support Syst..

[10]  Blake Ives,et al.  The information system as a competitive weapon , 1984, CACM.

[11]  Esther Gal-Or,et al.  Quality and Quantity Competition , 1983 .

[12]  Esther Gal-Or,et al.  Strategic and non-strategic differentiation , 1987 .

[13]  Esther Gal-Or,et al.  Differentiated industries without entry barriers , 1985 .

[14]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Information technology and economic reorganizational , 1989, ICIS '89.

[15]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[16]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  McKesson Drug Company: A Case Study of Economost - A Strategic Information System , 1988, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  J. Bakos Interorganizational information systems : strategic implications for competition and cooperation , 1988 .

[18]  M. Porter,et al.  How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage , 1985 .

[19]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Competition and cooperation in information systems innovation , 1988, Inf. Manag..

[20]  J. Tirole The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[21]  T. Bresnahan Measuring the Spillovers from Technical Advance: Mainframe Computers inFinancial Services , 1986 .

[22]  I. Png,et al.  Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions , 1992 .

[23]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Strategic Contributions of Information Technology: An Empirical Study of Atm Networks , 1988, ICIS.