The role of amino acid sequence in the self-association of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: insights from coarse-grained modeling.

Coarse-grained computational models of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and their mutants can be used to understand the effect of domain-level charge-charge electrostatics on the self-association phenomena at high protein concentrations. The coarse-grained models are constructed for two antibodies at different coarse-grained resolutions by using six different concentrations. It is observed that a particular monoclonal antibody (hereafter referred to as MAb1) forms three-dimensional heterogeneous structures with dense regions or clusters compared to a different monoclonal antibody (hereafter referred to as MAb2) that forms homogeneous structures without clusters. The potential of mean force (PMF) and radial distribution functions (RDF) plots for the mutants (hereafter referred to as M1, M5, M7, and M10) show trends consistent with previously reported experimental observation of viscosities. The mutant referred to as M6 shows strongly attractive interactions that are consistent with previously reported negative second virial coefficients (B(22)) obtained from light-scattering experiments (Yadav et al. Pharm. Res. 2011, 28, 1750-1764; Yadav et al. Mol. Pharmaceutics. 2012, 9, 791-802). Clustering data on MAb1 reveal a small number of large clusters that are hypothesized to be the reason for the high experimental viscosity. This is in contrast with M6 (that differs from MAb1 in only a few amino acids), where cluster analysis reveals the formation of a large number of smaller clusters that is hypothesized to be the reason for the observed lower viscosity. The coarse-grained representations are effective in picking up differences based on local charge distributions of domains to make predictions on the self-association characteristics of these protein solutions.

[1]  J. B. Matthew Electrostatic effects in proteins. , 1985, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[2]  K. Sharp,et al.  Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications. , 1990, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[3]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Mechanisms of protein assembly: lessons from minimalist models. , 2006, Accounts of chemical research.

[4]  A. Warshel,et al.  What are the dielectric “constants” of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? , 2001, Proteins.

[5]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas‐phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[6]  Steve Plimpton,et al.  Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics , 1993 .

[7]  Randall J Mrsny,et al.  Formulation and delivery issues for monoclonal antibody therapeutics. , 2006, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[8]  T. Patapoff,et al.  Construction, MD simulation, and hydrodynamic validation of an all-atom model of a monoclonal IgG antibody. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Coarse-grained modeling of the self-association of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[10]  Thomas Simonson,et al.  Electrostatics and dynamics of proteins , 2003 .

[11]  Steven J Shire,et al.  Reversible self-association increases the viscosity of a concentrated monoclonal antibody in aqueous solution. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[12]  T. Waldmann,et al.  Immunotherapy: past, present and future , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[13]  D. Weitz,et al.  Gelation of particles with short-range attraction , 2008, Nature.

[14]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  GPU-accelerated molecular modeling coming of age. , 2010, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[15]  Valentina Tozzini,et al.  Multiscale modeling of proteins. , 2010, Accounts of chemical research.

[16]  Sandeep Yadav,et al.  Viscosity behavior of high-concentration monoclonal antibody solutions: correlation with interaction parameter and electroviscous effects. , 2012, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[17]  L. Cipelletti,et al.  Jamming phase diagram for attractive particles , 2001, Nature.

[18]  Yatin R. Gokarn,et al.  Effective charge measurements reveal selective and preferential accumulation of anions, but not cations, at the protein surface in dilute salt solutions , 2011, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[19]  Sandeep Yadav,et al.  The influence of charge distribution on self-association and viscosity behavior of monoclonal antibody solutions. , 2012, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[20]  N. Go,et al.  Investigating protein dynamics in collective coordinate space. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[21]  Jim Pfaendtner,et al.  Defining coarse-grained representations of large biomolecules and biomolecular complexes from elastic network models. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[22]  A. Rosenberg,et al.  Effects of protein aggregates: An immunologic perspective , 2006, The AAPS Journal.

[23]  D. Massart,et al.  Looking for natural patterns in data: Part 1. Density-based approach , 2001 .

[24]  Sandeep Yadav,et al.  Factors affecting the viscosity in high concentration solutions of different monoclonal antibodies. , 2010, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[25]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Collective protein dynamics in relation to function. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[26]  Fred Jacobson,et al.  Protein aggregation and bioprocessing , 2006, The AAPS Journal.

[27]  Tim J Kamerzell,et al.  Increasing IgG concentration modulates the conformational heterogeneity and bonding network that influence solution properties. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[28]  Sandeep Yadav,et al.  Specific interactions in high concentration antibody solutions resulting in high viscosity. , 2010, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[29]  Steven J Shire,et al.  Challenges in the development of high protein concentration formulations. , 2004, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[30]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Multiscale modeling of biomolecular systems: in serial and in parallel. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.

[31]  Steven J Shire,et al.  Reversible self-association of a concentrated monoclonal antibody solution mediated by Fab-Fab interaction that impacts solution viscosity. , 2008, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[32]  Daniel E. Otzen,et al.  Protein drug stability: a formulation challenge , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[33]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[34]  Andrew C. Chan,et al.  Therapeutic antibodies for autoimmunity and inflammation , 2010, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[35]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Coarse-graining of multiprotein assemblies. , 2012, Current opinion in structural biology.

[36]  D. Kalonia,et al.  Nature and consequences of protein-protein interactions in high protein concentration solutions. , 2008, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[37]  S. Harding,et al.  The intrinsic viscosity of biological macromolecules. Progress in measurement, interpretation and application to structure in dilute solution. , 1997, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[38]  Borries Demeler,et al.  A postreductionist framework for protein biochemistry. , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[39]  Steven J Shire,et al.  Formulation and manufacturability of biologics. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[40]  Steven J. Shire,et al.  Establishing a Link Between Amino Acid Sequences and Self-Associating and Viscoelastic Behavior of Two Closely Related Monoclonal Antibodies , 2011, Pharmaceutical Research.