Equipment Distribution for Structural Stabilization and Civilian Rescue

The efficiency of Urban Search and Rescue operations depends on the supply of appropriate equipment and resources, and an efficient damage assessment facilitates deployment of these resources. This paper presents an Information Technology (IT) supported system for on-site data collection to communicate structural condition, track search and rescue status, and request and allocate appropriate resources. The system provides a unified interface for efficient gathering, storing, and sharing of building assessment information. Visualization and access of such information enable rescuers to respond to the disaster more efficiently with better situational awareness. The IT system also provides an interface for electronic resource requests to a geospatial resource repository service that enables a spatial disaster management environment for resource allocation. Request and deployment of critical resources through this system enables lifesaving efforts, with the appropriate equipment, operator, and materials, to become more efficient and effective. System development at the Illinois Fire Service Institute has shown promising results. man power is not sufficient to perform Urban Search and Rescue (US&R) operations. The performance of search and rescue depends on the delivery of these critical resources. As US&R operations involve the location, rescue, and initial medical stabilization of victims DOI: 10.4018/jiscrm.2011010102 20 International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, 3(1), 19-31, January-March 2011 Copyright © 2011, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited. trapped in confined spaces, inefficient equipment delivery could delay civilian rescue. At the same time, safety of the rescuers is one of the most important responsibilities of US&R and structural stability of damaged infrastructures is a key component of rescuers’ safety. FEMA US&R Structural triage is the process of evaluating structurally compromised buildings to determine operational priority (US Army Corps of Engineers, 2008). The priority is set based on factors such as occupancy, known victims, probability of live victims, collapse mechanism and structural condition. To keep track of search and rescue information at structurally compromised buildings, building marking systems (BMS) are used in the current practice. As technical rescue operations for major disasters tend to be in the order of hours/days, these marking systems are imperative for effective communication and allocation of rescue forces. In a lifesaving scenario, standardized information for building identification, conditions assessment, hazards and victim status is of great importance. However, challenges in the current practice have been identified. This paper presents an Information Technology (IT) supported system that addresses the challenges for on-site data collection to communicate structural condition, status of US&R operations, and to request resources for stabilization of those structures for search and rescue within those structures.

[1]  Bruce B. Cahan,et al.  Learning From Crisis , 2004 .

[2]  Yanfeng Ouyang,et al.  A collaborative GIS framework to support equipment distribution for civil engineering disaster response operations , 2011 .

[3]  Murray E. Jennex Crisis Response and Management and Emerging Information Systems: Critical Applications , 2011 .

[4]  Scott O. Bradner,et al.  Open Infrastructure for a Nationwide Emergency Services Network , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Crisis Response Manag..

[5]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  Supporting urban emergency response and recovery using RFID‐based building assessment , 2009 .

[6]  Murray E. Jennex,et al.  Managing Crises and Disasters with Emerging Technologies: Advancements , 2012 .

[7]  S. Gentes Rescue Operations and Demolition Works: Automating the Pneumatic Removal of Small Pieces of Rubble and Combination of Suction Plants with Demolition Machines , 2006 .

[8]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  The Past as the Future of Emergency Preparedness and Management , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Crisis Response Manag..

[9]  Tammy Esteves,et al.  Reaching Citizen 2.0: How Government Uses Social Media to Send Public Messages during Times of Calm and Times of Crisis , 2012 .

[10]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  A GIS approach to equipment allocation for structural stabilization and civilian rescue , 2010, ISCRAM.

[11]  James M. Kendra,et al.  Elements of resilience after the World Trade Center disaster: reconstituting New York City's Emergency Operations Centre. , 2003, Disasters.

[12]  Feniosky Peña-Mora,et al.  Building assessment during disaster response and recovery , 2008 .

[13]  Gideon F. For-mukwai The Transformative Power of Social Media on Emergency and Crisis Management , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Crisis Response Manag..

[14]  Kees Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management , 2007, Mobile Response.

[15]  John Lindström,et al.  A Methodology for Inter-Organizational Emergency Management Continuity Planning , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Crisis Response Manag..

[16]  C. V. Anderson,et al.  The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) , 2002 .

[17]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Mining Geospatial Knowledge on the Social Web , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Crisis Response Manag..

[18]  R. Bissell,et al.  Evidence of the Effectiveness of Health Sector Preparedness in Disaster Response: The Example of Four Earthquakes , 2004, Family & community health.

[19]  Khaled A El-Rayes,et al.  Mobile Ad Hoc Network-Enabled Collaboration Framework Supporting Civil Engineering Emergency Response Operations , 2010 .

[20]  Tricia Wachtendorf,et al.  Emergency Logistics Issues Affecting the Response to Katrina , 2007 .

[21]  Michael J. Kevany Geo-Information for Disaster Management: Lessons from 9/11 , 2005 .