Frequency weighting for the evaluation of steering wheel rotational vibration

Abstract The human perception of rotational hand–arm vibration has been investigated by means of a test rig consisting of a rigid frame, an electrodynamic shaker unit, a rigid steering wheel, a shaft assembly, bearings and an automobile seat. Fifteen subjects were tested while seated in a driving posture. Four equal sensation tests and one annoyance threshold test were performed using sinusoidal excitation at 18 frequencies in the range from 3 to 315 Hz. In order to guarantee the generality of the equal sensation data, the four tests were defined to permit checks of the possible influence of three factors: reference signal amplitude, psychophysical test procedure and temporary threshold shift caused by the test exposure. All equal sensation tests used a reference sinusoid of 63 Hz at either 1.0 or 1.5 m/s 2 r.m.s. in amplitude. The four equal sensation curves were similar in shape and suggested a decrease in human sensitivity to hand–arm rotational vibration with increasing frequency. The slopes of the equal sensation curves changed at transition points of approximately 6.3 and 63 Hz. A frequency weighting, called W s , was developed for the purpose of evaluating steering wheel rotational vibration. The proposed W s has a slope of 0 dB per octave over the frequency range from 3 to 6.3 Hz, a slope of −6 dB per octave from 6.3 to 50 Hz, a slope of 0 dB per octave from 50 to 160 Hz and a slope of −10 dB per octave from 160 to 315 Hz. W s provides a possible alternative to the existing W h frequency weighting defined in International Standards Organisation 5349-1 (2001) and British Standards Institution BS 6842 (1987). Relevance to industry For the manufacturers of tyres, steering systems and other vehicular components the proposed W s frequency weighting provides a more accurate representation of human perception of steering wheel rotational vibration than the W h weighting of ISO 5349-1 and BS6842.

[1]  D. D. Reynolds,et al.  Hand-arm vibration, Part III: Subjective response characteristics of individuals to hand-induced vibration , 1977 .

[2]  D. Joyce White Cynthia C. Norkin,et al.  Measurement of Joint Motion , 1985 .

[3]  Ronald T. Verrillo Psychophysics of vibrotactile stimulation , 1983 .

[4]  N J Mansfield,et al.  Symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders in stage rally drivers and co-drivers , 2001, British journal of sports medicine.

[5]  Perry R. Hinton Statistics Explained: A Guide for Social Science Students , 1995 .

[6]  E. Masmejean,et al.  The wrist of the formula 1 driver. , 1999, British journal of sports medicine.

[7]  S Watanabe,et al.  Temporary threshold shift of vibratory sensation after clasping a vibrating handle , 1981, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[8]  E. N. Angevine,et al.  Hand-arm vibration, part II: Vibration transmission characteristics of the hand and arm , 1977 .

[9]  Usik Lee,et al.  A Study on the Tangential Vibration of the Steering Wheel of Passenger Car , 1991 .

[10]  Marion G. Pottinger,et al.  A Review of Tire/Pavement Interaction Induced Noise and Vibration , 1986 .

[11]  L. Burström,et al.  Absorption of vibration energy in the human hand and arm. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[12]  N. Cohen The Relativity of Absolute Judgments , 1937 .

[13]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[14]  E. Dormegnie,et al.  HUMAN PERCEPTION OF SINUSOIDAL ROTATIONAL STEERING WHEEL VIBRATION. , 2001 .

[15]  Arihiro Isomura,et al.  Human factors on driver's steering wheel operation: Three parameters evaluating characteristics of driver's steering wheel operations , 1995 .

[16]  D. D. Reynolds,et al.  Hand-arm vibration, part I: Analytical model of the vibration response characteristics of the hand , 1977 .

[17]  D. D. Reynolds,et al.  Dynamic response of the hand-arm system to a sinusoidal input , 1972 .

[18]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  N Harada [Studies on the changes in the vibratory sensation threshold at the fingertip in relation to some physical parameters of exposed vibration. Part 1. A study on the methods of vibration exposure and measurement of the vibratory sensation threshold (author's transl)]. , 1978, Nihon eiseigaku zasshi. Japanese journal of hygiene.

[20]  Toshisuke Miwa,et al.  EVALUATION METHODS FOR VIBRATION EFFECT:PART 3. MEASUREMENTS OF THRESHOLD AND EQUAL SENSATION CONTOURS ON HAND FOR VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL SINUSOIDAL VIBRATIONS , 1967 .

[21]  M J Griffin,et al.  Measurement, evaluation, and assessment of occupational exposures to hand-transmitted vibration. , 1997, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[22]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[23]  A. Baddeley Human Memory: Theory and Practice, Revised Edition , 1990 .

[24]  Donald Laming,et al.  The relativity of ‘absolute’ judgements , 1984 .