Piezometric response in zones of a watershed with lateral preferential flow as a first‐order control on subsurface flow

Characterizing zones of a watershed based on the water table is used to understand and predict internal watershed processes. In watersheds dominated by lateral preferential flow, the water table response typically shows a distinct hydraulically limited pattern. This response is characterized by a capping of the rising water table when the lateral preferential flow features are activated and subsurface flow still increases. We expected that this response would be related to the contributing area since nearby hillslope excavations showed that the development of preferential flow network was positively correlated with the contributing area. The watershed was stratified into three predetermined zones and installed 25 piezometers to measure the water table dynamics. The objectives were (1) to characterize the water table–runoff relationship, (2) to prove preferential flow by observable characteristics and (3) to test the feasibility of identifying areas within a watershed that are dominated by lateral preferential flow. Watershed zones were not well defined and there was no strong relationship between the hydraulically limited response and observable watershed characteristics. Although zones might still be useful for grouping the hillslope processes, the piezometric response may not be an appropriate indicator for mapping the watershed into areas with runoff dominated by lateral preferential flow. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Younes Alila,et al.  Subsurface flow velocities in a hillslope with lateral preferential flow , 2009 .

[2]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  Hydrologic connectivity between landscapes and streams: Transferring reach‐ and plot‐scale understanding to the catchment scale , 2009 .

[3]  Younes Alila,et al.  Dye staining and excavation of a lateral preferential flow network. , 2008 .

[4]  G. Destouni,et al.  Bathymetry‐topography effects on saltwater–fresh groundwater interactions around the shrinking Aral Sea , 2006 .

[5]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 1. A 147‐storm analysis of the Panola hillslope , 2006 .

[6]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis , 2006 .

[7]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  The role of lateral pipe flow in hillslope runoff response: an intercomparison of non-linear hillslope response , 2005 .

[8]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Scale effects on headwater catchment runoff timing, flow sources, and groundwater‐streamflow relations , 2004 .

[9]  R. Sidle,et al.  Throughflow variability during snowmelt in a forested mountain catchment, coastal British Columbia, Canada , 2004 .

[10]  Kevin Bishop,et al.  Groundwater dynamics along a hillslope: A test of the steady state hypothesis , 2003 .

[11]  Keith Beven,et al.  The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow , 2002 .

[12]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration , 2002 .

[13]  T. Mizuyama,et al.  Effects of pipe flow and bedrock groundwater on runoff generation in a steep headwater catchment in Ashiu, central Japan , 2002 .

[14]  R. Moore,et al.  Throughflow variability on a forested hillslope underlain by compacted glacial till , 2000 .

[15]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Stormflow generation in steep forested headwaters: a linked hydrogeomorphic paradigm , 2000 .

[16]  R. Fannin,et al.  Hydrologic response of soils to precipitation at Carnation Creek, British Columbia, Canada , 2000 .

[17]  M. Tani.  Runoff generation processes estimated from hydrological observations on a steep forested hillslope with a thin soil layer , 1997 .

[18]  Keith Beven,et al.  Hydrological processes—Letters. Topographic controls on subsurface storm flow at the hillslope scale for two hydrologically distinct small catchmetns , 1997 .

[19]  Shoji Noguchi,et al.  Seasonal hydrologic response at various spatial scales in a small forested catchment, Hitachi Ohta, Japan , 1995 .

[20]  J. Buttle,et al.  Runoff Production in a Forested, Shallow Soil, Canadian Shield Basin , 1995 .

[21]  D. Montgomery,et al.  A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding , 1994 .

[22]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  A rationale for old water discharge through macropores in a steep, humid catchment. , 1990 .

[23]  Yoshinori Tsukamoto,et al.  Runoff process on a steep forested slope , 1988 .

[24]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[25]  Agustin Navarro,et al.  A modified optimization method of estimating aquifer parameters , 1977 .

[26]  J. Wilkinson.  Landslide initiation : a unified geostatistical and probabilistics modellin technique for terrain stability assessment , 1996 .

[27]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Hydrologic Processes in a Low-Gradient Source Area , 1995 .

[28]  R. Sidle.  Groundwater accretion in unstable hillslopes of coastal Alaska , 1986 .