Technological Change in Economic Models of Environmental Policy: A Survey

This paper provides an overview of the treatment of technological change in economic models of environmental policy. Numerous economic modeling studies have confirmed the sensitivity of mid- and long-run climate change mitigation cost and benefit projections to assumptions about technology costs. In general, technical progress is considered to be a noneconomic, exogenous variable in global climate change modeling. However, there is overwhelming evidence that technological change is not an exogenous variable but to an important degree endogenous, induced by needs and pressures. Hence, some environmenteconomy models treat technological change as endogenous, responding to socio-economic variables. Three main elements in models of technological innovation are: (i) corporate investment in research and development, (ii) spillovers from R&D, and (iii) technology learning, especially learning-by-doing. The incorporation of induced technological change in different types of environmental-economic models tends to reduce the costs of environmental policy, accelerates abatement and may lead to positive spillover and negative leakage.

[1]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Modeling Induced Innovation in Climate Change Policy , 2002 .

[2]  Richard S. Eckaus,et al.  The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model : revisions, sensitivities, and comparisons of results , 2001 .

[3]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[4]  Antonio Soria,et al.  Modelling energy technology dynamics: methodology for adaptive expectations models with learning by doing and learning by searching , 2000 .

[5]  R. Rothwell.  Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s , 1992 .

[6]  Carlo Carraro,et al.  Efficiency and equity of climate change policy , 2000 .

[7]  Thomas F. Rutherford,et al.  Sequential Joint Maximization , 1999 .

[8]  Michael Grubb,et al.  The Costs of Limiting Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions: A Survey and Analysis , 1993 .

[9]  J. Bruce,et al.  Climate change, 1995 : economic and social dimensions of climate change , 1997 .

[10]  Carlos Montalvo Corral,et al.  Environmental Policy and Technological Innovation , 2002 .

[11]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[12]  Michael Toman,et al.  Research Frontiers in the Economics of Climate Change , 1998 .

[13]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies , 1999 .

[14]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Endogenous Technological Change in Energy Systems Models: Synthesis of Experience with ERIS, MARKAL, and MESSAGE , 1998 .

[15]  Michael Grubb,et al.  The economics of changing course : Implications of adaptability and inertia for optimal climate policy , 1995 .

[16]  Terry Barker,et al.  Disaggregation in Econometric Modelling , 1990 .

[17]  Klaus Conrad,et al.  Computable General equilibrium Models in Environmental and Resource Economics , 2001 .

[18]  Pantelis Capros,et al.  The GEM-E3 General Equilibrium Model for the European Union , 1997 .

[19]  Influenceof socioeconomic inertia anduncertainty onoptimalCO 2-emission abatement , .

[20]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of Growth , 1993 .

[21]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  The Costs of Stabilizing Global C02 Emissions: A Probabilistic Analysis Based on Expert Judgments* , 1994 .

[22]  J. Hourcade,et al.  Climate modelling and policy strategies. The role of technical change and uncertainty , 1998 .

[23]  H. Welsch,et al.  Energy-Capital-Labor Substitution and the Economic Effects of CO2 Abatement: Evidence for Germany , 2000 .

[24]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[25]  Andrii Gritsevskyi,et al.  Modeling uncertainty of induced technological change , 2000 .

[26]  R. Kemp,et al.  Environmental policy and technical change : a comparison of the technological impact of policy instruments , 1995 .

[27]  M. Grubb.  Economic dimensions of technological and global responses to the Kyoto protocol , 2000 .

[28]  L. Goulder,et al.  Optimal Co2 Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technological Change , 1998 .

[29]  Marzio Galeotti,et al.  Endogenous Induced Technical Change and the Costs of Kyoto , 2001 .

[30]  Clifton T. Jones.  Accounting for technical progress in aggregate energy demand , 1994 .

[31]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[32]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Achieving low-cost emissions targets , 1997, Nature.

[33]  Arnulf Grubler,et al.  Technological change and the timing of mitigation measures , 1998 .

[34]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Technologies, energy systems and the timing of CO2 emissions abatement: An overview of economic issues , 1997 .

[35]  Z. Griliches.  HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[36]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[37]  Andreas Löschel,et al.  Economic impacts of carbon abatement strategies , 2002 .

[38]  J. Beghin,et al.  Trade liberalization and the environment in the Pacific Basin: coordinated approaches to Mexican trade and environment policy , 1995 .

[39]  M. Lessnoff.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[40]  T. Teisberg,et al.  CETA: A Model for Carbon Emissions Trajectory Assessment , 1992 .

[41]  C. Carraro,et al.  WARM: a European model for energy and environmental analysis , 1996 .

[42]  Dennis Anderson,et al.  Uncertainties in Responding to Climate Change: On the Economic Value of Technology Policies for Reducing Costs and Creating Options , 2001 .

[43]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Controlling Global Warming: Perspectives from Economics, Game Theory and Public Choice , 2002 .

[44]  John P. Weyant,et al.  Issues in modeling induced technological change in energy, environmental, and climate policy , 1999 .

[45]  Z. Griliches.  The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[46]  Vernon W. Ruttan,et al.  INDUCED INNOVATION, EVOLUTIONARY THEORY AND PATH DEPENDENCE: SOURCES OF TECHNICAL CHANGE* , 1997 .

[47]  R. Lucas.  On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[48]  W. Nordhaus.  Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change , 1994 .

[49]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Technological Change and the Environment , 2000 .

[50]  Marzio Galeotti,et al.  Economic growth, international competitiveness and environmental protection: R & D and innovation strategies with the WARM model , 1997 .

[51]  Richard G. Richels,et al.  The Costs of Reducing U.S. CO2 Emissions - Further Sensitivity Analyses , 1990 .

[52]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  Learn-by-doing and carbon dioxide abatement , 2004 .

[53]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down in energy policy modeling , 1998 .

[54]  G. Nicoletti,et al.  GREEN - - A Multi-Region Dynamic General Equilibrium Model for Quantifying the Costs of Curbing CO2 Emissions , 1991 .

[55]  R. Leemans,et al.  Global change scenarios of the 21st Century : results from the IMAGE 2.1 model , 1998 .

[56]  A. S. Manne.  ETA-MACRO: A user's guide , 1981 .

[57]  Hadi Dowlatabadi,et al.  A REVIEW OF TECHNICAL CHANGE IN ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE POLICY , 1999 .

[58]  W. Nordhaus,et al.  Roll the DICE Again: Economic Models of Global Warming , 1999 .

[59]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  Intertemporal general equilibrium modeling of U.S. environmental regulation , 1990 .

[60]  M. Paul,et al.  ENDOGENOUS TECHNICAL CHANGE , 1990 .

[61]  R. Solow.  A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth , 1956 .

[62]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Induced Technical Change: Evidence and Implications for Energy-Environmental Modelling and Policy , 2000 .

[63]  Stephen C. Peck,et al.  CO2 Emissions Control Agreements: Incentives for Regional Participation , 1999 .

[64]  T. Kram,et al.  Endogenous learning and technology clustering: analysis with MARKAL model of the Western European energy system , 2000 .

[65]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[66]  S. Messner,et al.  Endogenized technological learning in an energy systems model , 1997 .

[67]  Endogenous technical progress induced by CO2 reduction policies: Simulation results for Austria , 1995 .

[68]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[69]  J. A. Smulders,et al.  Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model , 1995 .

[70]  N. Kaldor.  A Model of Economic Growth , 1957 .

[71]  S. Karlin,et al.  Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences , 1962 .

[72]  J. Goldemberg.  World energy assessment : energy and the challenge of sustainability , 2000 .

[73]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Energy Market Projections and Differentiated Carbon Abatement in the European Union , 1999 .

[74]  A. Manne,et al.  Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of CO2 Emission Limits , 1992 .

[75]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[76]  S. D. Probert,et al.  Likely market-penetrations of renewable-energy technologies , 1998 .

[77]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations , 1996, Nature.

[78]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Meeting Environmental Objectives? , 1999 .

[79]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Modeling Technological Change: Implications for the Global Environment , 1999 .

[80]  H. Jacobsen.  Technological progress and long-term energy demand — a survey of recent approaches and a Danish case , 2001 .

[81]  M. Binswanger.  Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? , 2001 .

[82]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Mitigating factors : Assessing the costs of reducing GHG emissions , 1996 .

[83]  G. Watts,et al.  Climate Change 1995 , 1998 .

[84]  Energy and environmental constraints on growth: A CGE modeling approach , 1990 .

[85]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[86]  T. Rutherford,et al.  Climate Policies and Induced Technological Change: Which to Choose the Carrot or the Stick? , 2001 .

[87]  O. Davidson,et al.  Climate change 2001 : mitigation , 2001 .

[88]  W. Nordhaus.  Roll the DICE Again: The Economics of Global Warming , 1999 .

[89]  K. Conrad,et al.  Applied general equilibrium modeling for long-term energy policy in Germany , 1986 .

[90]  R. Tol.  Spatial and Temporal Efficiency in Climate Policy: Applications of FUND , 1999 .

[91]  W. Brown.  Argument in the Greenhouse: The International Economics of Controlling Global Warming , 1998 .

[92]  Lena Neij,et al.  Use of experience curves to analyse the prospects for diffusion and adoption of renewable energy technology , 1997 .

[93]  John Hicks,et al.  The Theory of Wages , 1933 .

[94]  M. Grubb,et al.  Influence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO2-emission abatement , 1997, Nature.

[95]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Learning rates for energy technologies , 2001 .

[96]  Jonathan Köhler,et al.  Equity and ecotax reform in the EU: achieving a 10 per cent reduction in CO2 emissions using excise duties , 1998 .

[97]  C. Wene.  Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[98]  Lena Christiansson,et al.  Diffusion and Learning Curves of Renewable Energy Technologies , 1995 .

[99]  Hadi Dowlatabadi,et al.  Sensitivity of climate change mitigation estimates to assumptions about technical change , 1998 .