A Weighted Euclidean Distance based TOPSIS Method for Modeling Public Subjective Judgments

Public involvement in transportation planning and decision-making process is a key component for ensuring that decisions are made with consideration of public needs and preferences. In this paper, a weighted Euclidean distance based TOPSIS method (WEDTOPSIS) is developed for modeling such a public decision-making process. The Weber–Fechner psycho-physical law is adopted for behavioral modeling of human judgments. Distances to the positive-ideal and negative-ideal solutions of TOPSIS are converted to value measurement models using the Weber–Fechner law. The proposed method is applied on a case where public approval of two different types of public bus operation systems considering six criteria is sought. A numerical illustration is also provided to demonstrate the applicability of the approach. The method provides plausible results in terms of preferences, and shows a high agreement with the ordinary TOPSIS in terms of rankings. Another example showing disagreement on ranking is further analyzed to outline the discrepancies between the TOPSIS and WEDTOPSIS and to indicate the proposed model’s consistency with the behavioral theory. The results are also compared with the results of the additive multi-attribute value (MAVT) method for assessing the performance of the model. Based on the findings, using the proposed method as a decision support tool can be useful, particularly where public input is needed.

[1]  Lav R. Varshney,et al.  Why do we perceive logarithmically? , 2013 .

[2]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Public perceptions of toll roads : A survey of the Texas perspective , 2006 .

[3]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[4]  S. Sadi-Nezhad,et al.  A modified TOPSIS technique in presence of uncertainty and its application to assessment of transportation systems , 2011 .

[5]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Manufacturing plant location analysis by multiple attribute decision making: part I—single-plant strategy , 1985 .

[6]  Xiaodong Liu,et al.  Supplier selection using axiomatic fuzzy set and TOPSIS methodology in supply chain management , 2012, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[7]  N. Yayla,et al.  A decision support model to incorporate public and expert opinions for assessing the privatization of public bus transit system: Application of ELECTRE for the bus system in Eskisehir, Turkey , 2011 .

[8]  Gregory S. Parnell,et al.  Decision-Focused Transformation of Additive Value Models to Improve Communication , 2010, Decis. Anal..

[9]  Tugba Efendigil,et al.  A combined fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting shopping center site: An example from Istanbul, Turkey , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  F. Lootsma Multicriteria decision analysis in a decision tree , 1997 .

[11]  Georgios Athanasopoulos,et al.  A decision support system for coating selection based on fuzzy logic and multi-criteria decision making , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2012 .

[13]  C. Jotin Khisty,et al.  A rational reasoning method from fuzzy perceptions in route choice , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[14]  Anjali Awasthi,et al.  A hybrid approach based on SERVQUAL and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating transportation service quality , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[15]  F. Lootsma SCALE SENSITIVITY IN THE MULTIPLICATIVE AHP AND SMART , 1993 .

[16]  Vivek K. Goyal,et al.  A framework for Bayesian optimality of psychophysical laws , 2012, Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

[17]  Avishai Ceder,et al.  Transportation projects selection process using fuzzy sets theory , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[18]  David C. Colander,et al.  Retrospectives: Edgeworth's Hedonimeter and the Quest to Measure Utility , 2007 .

[19]  B. Roy The outranking approach and the foundations of electre methods , 1991 .

[20]  Serkan Yavuz,et al.  Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  C. Hwang Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1979 .

[22]  Turan Arslan,et al.  A hybrid model of fuzzy and AHP for handling public assessments on transportation projects , 2008 .

[23]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Ying-Ming Wang,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[25]  D. M. MacKay,et al.  Psychophysics of Perceived Intensity: A Theoretical Basis for Fechner's and Stevens' Laws , 1963, Science.

[26]  Irfan Ertugrul,et al.  Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  A fuzzy integrated methodology for evaluating conceptual bridge design , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[29]  Michael A. Elliott,et al.  Selecting numerical scales for pairwise comparisons , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country , 2004, Math. Comput. Model..

[31]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.