Optimized complex signals for Eddy Current Testing

The choice of optimized excitation devices and strategies is now interesting recent studies about Non Destructive Eddy Current Testing (ND-ECT). Recently, the attention has been paid to the use of complex excitation signals, meant as signals different from the sinusoidal ones and with wide frequency content. In particular, some studies have highlighted their suitability, respect to the sinusoidal one, in supporting the measurement, detection and quantification stages when “difficult cases” are explored (i.e. very short or annealed cracks). Generally, two class of signal have been proposed in literature. They concern with signals that have to be analysed in the time domain and signals analysed in transformed domains. The former class is represented by signal as the pulsed or pseudo-noise, while the latter contains signal as the chirp or multi-frequency as the best candidate. The author have placed their attention to this second class of signal and in this paper they propose an experimental comparison among different realization of these excitation signals suitably designed to improve the quality of experimental data when difficult cases are experienced.

[1]  Antonello Tamburrino,et al.  Multi-frequency identification of defects in conducting media , 2008 .

[2]  Pietro Burrascano,et al.  Time domain deconvolution approach relying on Galois sequences , 2007 .

[3]  M. Schroeder Integrated‐impulse method measuring sound decay without using impulses , 1979 .

[4]  M Min,et al.  Broadband excitation for short-time impedance spectroscopy , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[5]  G. Mazzini,et al.  Statistical modeling of discrete-time chaotic processes-basic finite-dimensional tools and applications , 2002, The IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2003. Tutorial Guide: ISCAS 2003..

[6]  H. Ermert,et al.  Chirp signal matching and signal power optimization in pulse-echo mode ultrasonic nondestructive testing , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[7]  Solomon W. Golomb,et al.  Shift Register Sequences , 1981 .

[8]  O Postolache,et al.  Using the skin effect to estimate cracks depths in mettalic structures , 2009, 2009 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference.

[9]  Masato Enokizono,et al.  Crack detection and recognition using an eddy current differential probe , 1999 .

[10]  Luigi Ferrigno,et al.  Multi-frequency Eddy Current Testing using a GMR based instrument , 2012 .

[11]  Luigi Ferrigno,et al.  GMR-Based ECT Instrument for Detection and Characterization of Crack on a Planar Specimen: A Hand-Held Solution , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[12]  Zhiwei Zeng,et al.  Pulsed Eddy-Current Based Giant Magnetoresistive System for the Inspection of Aircraft Structures , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[13]  Luigi Ferrigno,et al.  Crack Depth Estimation by Using a Multi-Frequency ECT Method , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[14]  Wuliang Yin,et al.  Thickness measurement of non-magnetic plates using multi-frequency eddy current sensors , 2007 .

[15]  Manfred R. Schroeder,et al.  Synthesis of low-peak-factor signals and binary sequences with low autocorrelation (Corresp.) , 1970, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[16]  Wuliang Yin,et al.  A multi-frequency impedance analysing instrument for eddy current testing , 2006 .

[17]  Pietro Burrascano,et al.  Galois sequences in the non-destructive evaluation of metallic materials , 2006 .

[18]  G. Turin,et al.  An introduction to matched filters , 1960, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  David Jiles,et al.  Review of magnetic methods for nondestructive evaluation (Part 2) , 1990 .

[20]  Luigi Ferrigno,et al.  On the use of complex excitation sequences for eddy current testing , 2013 .