Relo: Helping Users Manage Context during Interactive Exploratory Visualization of Large Codebases

As software systems grow in size and use more third-party libraries and frameworks, the need for developers to understand unfamiliar large codebases is rapidly increasing. In this paper, we present a tool, Relo, which supports developers' understanding by allowing interactive exploration of code. As the developer explores relationships found in the code, Relo builds and automatically manages the context in visualization, thereby helping build the developer's mental representation of the code. Developers can group viewed artifacts or use the viewed items to ask Relo for further exploration suggestions, with Relo providing features to limit the growth of the diagram. To ensure developers don't get overwhelmed, Relo has been built with a user-centered approach, and preliminary evaluations with developers exploring new code have shown them to find the tool intuitive and helpful

[1]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Towards understanding programs through wear-based filtering , 2005, SoftVis '05.

[2]  J. E. Sammet,et al.  Software psychology: human factors in computer and information systems , 1983, SGCH.

[3]  Kris De Volder,et al.  Navigating and querying code without getting lost , 2003, AOSD '03.

[4]  Hausi A. Müller,et al.  Manipulating and documenting software structures using SHriMP views , 1995, Proceedings of International Conference on Software Maintenance.

[5]  Brad A. Myers,et al.  Eliciting design requirements for maintenance-oriented IDEs: a detailed study of corrective and perfective maintenance tasks , 2005, ICSE.

[6]  Liqun Wang.  Animated exploring of huge software systems , 2003 .

[7]  Ivan Herman,et al.  Graph Visualization and Navigation in Information Visualization: A Survey , 2000, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[8]  Hausi A. Müller,et al.  How do program understanding tools affect how programmers understand programs? , 2000, Sci. Comput. Program..

[9]  N. Pennington.  Stimulus structures and mental representations in expert comprehension of computer programs , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Elliot Soloway,et al.  Designing documentation to compensate for delocalized plans , 1988, CACM.

[11]  Dan Brickley,et al.  Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification , 2002 .

[12]  Gitte Lindgaard.  Usability testing and system evaluation - a guide for designing useful computer systems , 1994, Chapman and Hall computing series.

[13]  S.G. Eick,et al.  Scaling to New Heights , 1998, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[14]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[15]  Hausi A. Müller,et al.  Cognitive design elements to support the construction of a mental model during software visualization , 1997, Proceedings Fifth International Workshop on Program Comprehension. IWPC'97.

[16]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Query previews in networked information systems , 1996, Proceedings of the Third Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries,.

[17]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  The perfect search engine is not enough: a study of orienteering behavior in directed search , 2004, CHI.

[18]  Susan Elliott Sim,et al.  The ramp-up problem in software projects: a case study of how software immigrants naturalize , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Software Engineering.

[19]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Software psychology: Human factors in computer and information systems (Winthrop computer systems series) , 1980 .

[20]  Martin P. Robillard,et al.  Concern graphs: finding and describing concerns using structural program dependencies , 2002, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2002.