Organisational Innovation, Governance Structure and Innovative Capacity In British and French Industry

This study makes use of the results of a postal questionnaire sent to a sample of large private sector companies in Britain and France to address two key issues in the new institutional analysis of the firm. The first is the way the institutional environment supports and constrains the design of firm-level organisational devices and governance mechanisms. The second concerns the relation between the introduction of new organisational methods and the firm’s innovative capacity. Multiple correspondence analysis is used to describe the relation between the use of innovative work methods and pay policies. The analysis shows that the policies of the British sample of firms display greater ‘coherence’ than those of the French sample, in the sense that a more intensive use of the new organisational methods is more consistently associated with a more intensive use of the new pay policies. Ordered logit regression analysis shows that UK firms with positive expenditures on R&D are more likely to introduce new organisational methods than those not making such expenditures. This relation between the use of new organisational methods and investments in innovative capacity are not confirmed for the French case.

[1]  Gert Villumsen,et al.  The Long Term Development of OECD Export Specialisation Patterns De-Specialisation and Stickiness , 1996 .

[2]  Keld Laursen,et al.  How Structural Change Differs, and Why it Matters (for Economic Growth) , 1998 .

[3]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  What Permits Small Firms to Compete in High-Tech Industries? Inter-Organizational Knowledge Creation in the Taiwanese Computer Industry , 1998 .

[4]  M. Præst,et al.  An Empirical Model of Firm Behaviour: a Dynamic Approach to Competence Accumulation and Strategic Behaviour an Empirical Model of Firm Behaviour: a Dynamic Approach to Competence Accumulation and Strategic Behaviour , 2022 .

[5]  M. Valente,et al.  Technological Competition : a Qualitative Product Life Cycle , 1998 .

[6]  Allan Næs Gjerding,et al.  Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics Organisational Innovation in the Danish Private Business Sector Organisational Innovation in the Danish Private Business Sector , 2022 .

[7]  Ina Drejer,et al.  Studies of Clusters as a Basis for Industrial and Technology Policy in the Danish Economy , 1997 .

[8]  Nicolai J Foss,et al.  Firms and the Coordination of KnowledgeSome Austrian Insights , 1998 .

[9]  Frank Skov Kristensen,et al.  A Study of Four Organisations in Different Competetive Environment , 1997 .

[10]  Esben Sloth Andersen,et al.  The Evolution of an Industrial Sector with a Varying Degree of Roundaboutness of Production , 1996 .

[11]  Reinhard Lund,et al.  Organizational and Innovative Flexibility Mechanisms and their Impact upon Organizational Effectiveness , 1998 .

[12]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Localized Low-Tech Learning in the Furniture Industry , 1996 .

[13]  Alice Lam Tacit Knowledge, Organisational Learning and Innovation A Societal Perspective , 1998 .

[14]  Esben Sloth Andersen,et al.  The Nelson and Winter Models Revisited: Prototypes for Computer-Based Reconstruction of Schumpeterian Competition , 1996 .

[15]  Esben Sloth Andersen,et al.  The Evolution of the Organisation of Industry , 1998 .

[16]  Jens Frøslev Christensen,et al.  A Process Approach to Corporate Coherence , 1996 .

[17]  Morris Teubal,et al.  Restructuring and Embeddeness Of Business Enterprises - Towards An Innovation System Perspective On Diffusion Policy , 1997 .

[18]  N. Foss Thorstein B. Veblen: Precursor of the Competence-Based Approach to the Firm , 1996 .

[19]  Jukka Kaisla,et al.  The Market Process and the Emergence of the Firm Some Indications of Entrepreneurship Under Genuine uncertainty , 1998 .

[20]  G. Richardson,et al.  Competition, Innovation and Increasing Returns , 1996 .

[21]  Peter Maskell,et al.  Firm growth from a knowledge structure perspective , 1999 .

[22]  Eileen Appelbaum,et al.  The New American Workplace , 1993 .

[23]  Volker Mahnke,et al.  Processes of Strategic Renewal, Competencies, and the Management of Speed , 1998 .

[24]  Paolo Guerrieri,et al.  International Production Networks And Changing Trade Patterns in East Asia: The Case of the Electronics Industry , 1998 .

[25]  R. Langlois,et al.  Capabilities and Governance: The Rebirth of Production in the Theory of Economic Organization , 1997 .

[26]  Ina Drejer,et al.  Do Inter-sectoral Linkages Matter for International Export Specialisation? , 1999 .

[27]  Stephen Ackroyd,et al.  The Japanisation of British industry , 1988 .

[28]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  Catching-up Crisis and Industrial Upgrading: Evolutionary Aspects of Technological Learning in Korea's Electronics Industry , 1998 .

[29]  D. Levine Participation, Productivity, and the Firm's Environment , 1990 .

[30]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Theories of the firm: contractual and competence perspectives , 1993 .

[31]  Kirsten Foss,et al.  A Transaction Cost Perspective on the Influence of Standards on Product Development: Examples from the Fruit and Vegetable Market , 1996 .

[32]  P. Osterman How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts it? , 1994 .

[33]  Mark Lorenzen,et al.  Information Cost, Learning, and Trust Lessons from Co-operation and Higher-order Capabilities amongst Geographically Proximate Firms , 1998 .

[34]  Nicolai Juul Foss,et al.  Austrian Economics and Game Theory a Preliminary Methodological Stocktaking , 1998 .

[35]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  Partners for the China Circle? The Asian Production Networks of Japanese Electronics Firms , 1997 .

[36]  N. Foss,et al.  Firms, Incomplete Contracts and Organizational Learning , 1996 .

[37]  E. Lorenz Trust, Contract and Economic Cooperation , 1999 .

[38]  Keld Laursen,et al.  The Impact of Technological Opportunity on the Dynamics of Trade Performance , 1996 .

[39]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  The Social Dimension of the Learning Economy , 1996 .

[40]  Poul Houman Andersen,et al.  Organizing international technological collaboration in subcontractor relationships: an investigation of the knowledge-stickiness problem , 1999 .

[41]  N. Foss Capabilities and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[42]  E. Lorenz,et al.  Societal Effects and the Transfer of Business Practices to Britain and France Societal Effects and the Transfer of Business Practices to Britain and France , 2022 .

[43]  E. Lazear,et al.  An Economic Analysis of Works Councils , 1994 .

[44]  M. Greenacre Correspondence analysis in practice , 1993 .

[45]  Ken Ducatel,et al.  Learning and Skills in the Knowledge Economy , 1998 .

[46]  Allan Næs Gjerding,et al.  The Flexible Company: Innovation, Work Organization and Human Resource Management , 1996 .

[47]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Equilibrium vs Evolution in the Resource-Based Perspective The Conflicting Legacies of Demsetz and Penrose , 2005 .

[48]  Kirsten Foss,et al.  Technological Interdependencies,Specialization and Coordination A Property Rights Perspective on The Nature of the Firm , 1998 .

[49]  Keld Laursen,et al.  Do export and technological specialisation patterns co-evolve in terms of convergence or divergence? Evidence from 19 OECD countries, 1971–1991 , 2000 .

[50]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Incomplete Contracts and Economic Organization Brian Loasby and the Theory of the Firm , 1997 .

[51]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  The Market Process and The Firm: Toward a Dynamic Property Rights Perspective , 1998 .

[52]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Strategy Research and the Market Process Perspective , 1998 .

[53]  William Lazonick,et al.  The Decline of the British Economy. , 1987 .

[54]  N. Foss,et al.  Austrian and Post-Marshallian Economics: The Bridging Work of George Richardson , 1996 .

[55]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity , 1995 .

[56]  Gert Villumsen,et al.  Are OECD Export Specialization Patterns 'Sticky?' Relations to the Convergence-Divergence Debate , 1996 .

[57]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  High-Tech Competition Puzzles. How Globalization Affects Firm Behavior and Market Structure in the Electronics Industry , 1998 .

[58]  Esben Sloth Andersen,et al.  Satiation in an evolutionary model of structural economic dynamics , 1998 .

[59]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  Institutions, Inertia, and Changing Industrial Leadership , 1994 .

[60]  Søren Nymark,et al.  Billeder af strategi i forandringsrige organisatoriske omgivelser 3 cases fra DISKO studierne , 1998 .