Severity, Efficacy, and Evidence Type as Determinants of Health Message Exposure

This cross-cultural experiment examined the effectiveness of three health message characteristics to foster or inhibit selective exposure to health information. An online magazine was created with eight articles about various health risks. Four articles were manipulated regarding (1) severity of the described health threat (low versus high), (2) suggested efficacy to avoid or minimize negative consequences (low versus high) and (3) type of evidence presented (statistical information versus exemplar information). Respondents from the U.S. and from Germany (n = 301/298) browsed through the magazine while selective exposure was unobtrusively logged. Findings reveal country-specific exposure patterns. A positive main effect of severity was only found for U.S. respondents. Independent of respondents' country, significantly more time was spent with low-severity/high-efficacy messages and high-severity/low-efficacy messages than with articles featuring the often-recommended high-severity/high-efficacy message combination. Respondents generally read more exemplar messages than those with statistical evidence, especially when high efficacy was suggested. Implications of these exposure patterns for the real-life effectiveness of health messages are discussed and an improved theoretical conceptualization of message effectiveness is proposed.

[1]  Hans-Bernd Brosius,et al.  Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. , 2012 .

[2]  M. Kreuter,et al.  Using Narrative Communication as a Tool for Health Behavior Change: A Conceptual, Theoretical, and Empirical Overview , 2007, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[3]  Susana Peinado.  THREAT AND EFFICACY MESSAGES IN NEWSPAPER ARTICLES ON HEART DISEASE AND TYPE 2 DIABETES , 2008 .

[4]  E. S. Knowles,et al.  Approach-Avoidance Model of Persuasion: Alpha and Omega Strategies for Change , 2004 .

[5]  Wolfgang Stroebe,et al.  The Impact of Vulnerability to and Severity of a Health Risk on Processing and Acceptance of Fear-Arousing Communications: A Meta-Analysis , 2007 .

[6]  D. Zillmann.  Mood Management in the Context of Selective Exposure Theory , 2000 .

[7]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  Social Comparisons With News Personae , 2006, Commun. Res..

[8]  R. Hornik.  Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change. , 2013 .

[9]  Amber M. Reinhart,et al.  Comparing the Persuasive Effects of Narrative versus Statistical Messages: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2007 .

[10]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change , 1983 .

[11]  Rajiv N. Rimal,et al.  The Role of Anxiety in Seeking and Retaining Risk Information: Testing the Risk Perception Attitude Framework in Two Studies , 2006 .

[12]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1. , 1975, The Journal of psychology.

[13]  W. Donsbach,et al.  Cognitive Dissonance Theory—A Roller Coaster Career: How Communication Research Adapted the Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2009 .

[14]  Albert Bandura.  Cambridge Handbook of Psychology, Health and Medicine: Self-efficacy in health functioning , 2007 .

[15]  Bradford Hesse,et al.  Occupational Practices and the Making of Health News: A National Survey of U.S. Health and Medical Science Journalists , 2008, Journal of health communication.

[16]  K. Witte,et al.  Looking toward the future: health message design strategies. , 2003 .

[17]  Robin L. Nabi,et al.  Subjective Knowledge and Fear Appeal Effectiveness: Implications for Message Design , 2008, Health communication.

[18]  David R. Roskos-Ewoldsen,et al.  Fear appeal messages affect accessibility of attitudes toward the threat and adaptive behaviors , 2004 .

[19]  Vivian C. Sheer,et al.  Intrinsic characteristics of health-related fear appeals from Chinese print OTC ads: Implications for fear message construction , 2008 .

[20]  N. Weinstein.  The precaution adoption process. , 1988, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[21]  Dolf Zillmann,et al.  Exemplification Effects in the Promotion of Safety and Health , 2006 .

[22]  I. Rosenstock,et al.  Social Learning Theory and the Health Belief Model , 1988, Health education quarterly.

[23]  Hans Hoeken,et al.  Anecdotal, Statistical, and Causal Evidence: Their Perceived and Actual Persuasiveness , 2001 .

[24]  Suzanne L. Allard,et al.  Avoiding versus seeking: the relationship of information seeking to avoidance, blunting, coping, dissonance, and related concepts. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[25]  M. Limón,et al.  A comparison of exemplar and statistical evidence in reducing counter‐arguments and responses to a message , 2004 .

[26]  Robert C. Hornik,et al.  Introduction Public Health Communication: Making Sense of Contradictory Evidence , 2002 .

[27]  Daniel J. O'Keefe,et al.  Message Properties, Mediating States, and Manipulation Checks: Claims, Evidence, and Data Analysis in Experimental Persuasive Message Effects Research , 2003 .

[28]  H. Leventhal,et al.  Findings and Theory in the Study of Fear Communications , 1970 .

[29]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick.  Mood Management: Theory, Evidence, and Advancements , 2013 .

[30]  F. Carpentier.  Applicability of the Informational Utility Model for Radio News , 2008 .

[31]  P. Herschbach,et al.  Questions on Life Satisfaction (FLZM) - A Short Questionnaire for Assessing Subjective Quality of Life , 2000 .

[32]  V. Covello,et al.  Effective Media Communication During Public Health Emergencies: A WHO Field Guide , 2007 .

[33]  K. Witte.  Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model , 1992 .

[34]  Katja Gelbrich,et al.  Werbewirkung von Furchtappellen: Stand der Forschung , 2008 .

[35]  Rajiv N. Rimal,et al.  Using computers to narrowcast health messages: The role of audience segmentation, targeting, and tailoring in health promotion. , 2003 .

[36]  R. Peterson.  On the Use of College Students in Social Science Research: Insights from a Second‐Order Meta‐analysis , 2001 .

[37]  J. Arndt,et al.  The implications of death for health: a terror management health model for behavioral health promotion. , 2008, Psychological review.

[38]  I. Rosenstock,et al.  What research in motivation suggests for public health. , 1960, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[39]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[40]  A. McKinlay,et al.  Social Psychology and Health , 2009 .

[41]  D. Goldsmith,et al.  Information Seeking and Avoiding in Health Contexts , 2002 .

[42]  Christiane Eilders.  News factors and news decisions. Theoretical and methodological advances in Germany , 2006 .

[43]  H. Hoeken,et al.  The influence of exemplars in fear appeals on the perception of self-efficacy and message acceptance , 2005 .

[44]  Raymond W. Preiss,et al.  Comparing the persuasiveness of narrative and statistical evidence using meta‐analysis , 1997 .

[45]  Sun Young Lee,et al.  Interplay of Negative Emotion and Health Self-Efficacy on the Use of Health Information and Its Outcomes , 2008, Commun. Res..

[46]  R. Rimal,et al.  Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change: Use of the risk perception attitude (RPA) framework to understand health behaviors , 2003 .

[47]  M. Hecht,et al.  A Model of Effects of Narrative as Culture-Centric Health Promotion , 2010, Journal of health communication.

[48]  K. Stowman.  World health statistics. , 1949, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly.

[49]  R. Mullner.  Encyclopedia of health services research , 2009 .

[50]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[51]  B. Lewis,et al.  Culture and Health Communication , 2015 .

[52]  Laura A. Brannon,et al.  Increasing Selective Exposure to Health Messages by Targeting Person Versus Behavior Schemas , 2006, Health communication.

[53]  S. Simmons.  Essentials of the U.S. Health Care System, 2nd Edition , 2011 .

[54]  A. Bandura.  Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means , 2004, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[55]  Partners,et al.  Health information online , 2015 .

[56]  Magdalena Cismaru,et al.  Interaction effects and combinatorial rules governing Protection Motivation Theory variables: a new model , 2007 .

[57]  S. Kazarian,et al.  Handbook of cultural health psychology , 2001 .

[58]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[59]  E. Das,et al.  What works best: objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception. , 2008, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[60]  M. Allen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns , 2000, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[61]  M. Mattson,et al.  Breast Self-Examination Pamphlets: A Content Analysis Grounded in Fear Appeal Research , 2000, Health communication.

[62]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  »Informational Utility« , 2005 .