Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly

The functional properties of the three horizontal cells (north horizontal cell, HSN; equatorial horizontal cell, HSE; south horizontal cell, HSS) in the lobula plate of the blowflyCalliphora erythrocephala were investigated electrophysiologically. 1. The receptive fields of the HSN, HSE, and HSS cover the dorsal, equatorial and ventral part of the ipsilateral visual field, respectively. In all three cells, the sensitivity to visual stimulation is highest in the frontal visual field and decreases laterally. The receptive fields and spatial sensitivity distributions of the horizontal cells are directly determined by the position and extension of their dendritic fields in the lobula plate and the dendritic density distributions within these fields. 2. The horizontal cells respond mainly to progressive (front to back) motion and are inhibited by motion in the reverse direction, the preferred and null direction being antiparallel. The amplitudes of motion induced excitatory and inhibitory responses decline like a cosine function with increasing deviation of the direction of motion from the preferred direction. Stimulation with motion in directions perpendicular to the preferred direction is ineffective. 3. The preferred directions of the horizontal cells show characteristic gradual orientation changes in different parts of the receptive fields: they are horizontally oriented only in the equatorial region and increasingly tilted vertically towards the dorsofrontal and ventrofrontal margins of the visual field. These orientation changes can be correlated with equivalent changes in the local orientation of the lattice of ommatidial axes in the pertinent compound eye. 4. The response amplitudes of the horizontal cells under stimulation with a moving periodic grating depend strongly on the contrast frequency of the stimulus. Maximal responses were found at contrast frequencies of 2–5 Hz. 5. The spatial integration properties of the horizontal cells (studied in the HSE) are highly nonlinear. Under stimulation with extended moving patterns, their response amplitudes are nearly independent of the size of the stimuli. It is demonstrated that this response behaviour does not result from postsynaptic saturation in the dendrites of the cells. The results indicate that the horizontal system is essentially involved in the neural control of optomotor torque responses performed by the fly in order to minimize unvoluntary deviations from a straight flight course.

[1]  K. Hausen Functional Characterization and Anatomical Identification of Motion Sensitive Neurons in the Lobula plate of the Blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala , 1976 .

[2]  Hendrik Eckert,et al.  Functional properties of the H1-neurone in the third optic Ganglion of the Blowfly,Phaenicia , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[3]  R. Hengstenberg Spike responses of ‘non-spiking’ visual interneurone , 1977, Nature.

[4]  B. Pick,et al.  Visual pattern discrimination as an element of the fly's orientation behaviour , 1976, Biological Cybernetics.

[5]  R. Wolf,et al.  Optomotor-blindH31—aDrosophila mutant of the lobula plate giant neurons , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[6]  G. Geiger,et al.  Visual orientation behaviour of flies after selective laser beam ablation of interneurones , 1981, Nature.

[7]  J. Blondeau Aerodynamic Capabilities of Flies, as Revealed by a New Technique , 1981 .

[8]  Christian Wehrhahn,et al.  How is tracking and fixation accomplished in the nervous system of the fly? , 1980, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Gilbert D. McCann,et al.  Binocular interactions of motion detection fibers in the optic lobes of flies , 1971, Kybernetik.

[10]  Werner Reichardt,et al.  Figure-ground discrimination by relative movement in the visual system of the fly , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  K. Hausen Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  G. Geiger,et al.  Visual processing of moving single objects and wide-field patterns in flies: Behavioural analysis after laser-surgical removal of interneurons , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[13]  Martin Heisenberg,et al.  The three-dimensional optomotor torque system ofDrosophila melanogaster , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[14]  R. Hengstenberg Common visual response properties of giant vertical cells in the lobula plate of the blowflyCalliphora , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[15]  H. A. K. Mastebroek,et al.  Movement detection: Performance of a wide-field element in the visual system of the blowfly , 1980, Vision Research.

[16]  V. Braitenberg Periodic structures and structural gradients in the visual ganglia of the fly , 1972 .

[17]  G. Heide Properties of a motor output system involved in the optomotor response in flies , 1975, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  T. Poggio,et al.  A neuronal circuitry for relative movement discrimination by the visual system of the fly , 1981, Naturwissenschaften.

[19]  Karl Georg Götz,et al.  Optomotor control of wing beat and body posture in drosophila , 1979, Biological Cybernetics.

[20]  D. G. Stavenga,et al.  Retinal lattice, visual field and binocularities in flies , 1977, Journal of comparative physiology.

[21]  G. D. Mccann,et al.  Fundamental Properties of Intensity, Form, and Motion Perception in the Visual Nervous Systems of Calliphora phaenicia and Musca domestica , 1969, The Journal of general physiology.

[22]  Intensity and motion responses of giant vertical neurons of the fly eye. , 1980, Journal of neurobiology.

[23]  Hendrik Eckert,et al.  The horizontal cells in the lobula plate of the blowfly,Phaenicia sericata , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[24]  G. D. Mccann,et al.  Motion detection by interneurons of optic lobes and brain of the flies Calliphora phaenicia and Musca domestica. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Lewis G. Bishop,et al.  On the identification of movement detectors in the fly optic lobe , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[26]  J. Blondeau,et al.  Electrically Evoked Course Control in the Fly Calliphora Erythrocephala , 1981 .

[27]  W. Zaagman,et al.  On the correlation model: Performance of a movement detecting neural element in the fly visual system , 1978, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  Nicolas Franceschini,et al.  Sampling of the Visual Environment by the Compound Eye of the Fly: Fundamentals and Applications , 1975 .