Audiological outcome measures with the BONEBRIDGE transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: impact of noise, reverberation and signal processing features

Abstract Objective: To assess the performance of an active transcutaneous implantable-bone conduction device (TI-BCD), and to evaluate the benefit of device digital signal processing (DSP) features in challenging listening environments. Design: Participants were tested at 1- and 3-month post-activation of the TI-BCD. At each session, aided and unaided phoneme perception was assessed using the Ling-6 test. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and quality ratings of speech and music samples were collected in noisy and reverberant environments, with and without the DSP features. Self-assessment of the device performance was obtained using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire. Study sample: Six adults with conductive or mixed hearing loss. Results: Average SRTs were 2.9 and 12.3 dB in low and high reverberation environments, respectively, which improved to −1.7 and 8.7 dB, respectively with the DSP features. In addition, speech quality ratings improved by 23 points with the DSP features when averaged across all environmental conditions. Improvement scores on APHAB scales revealed a statistically significant aided benefit. Conclusions: Noise and reverberation significantly impacted speech recognition performance and perceived sound quality. DSP features (directional microphone processing and adaptive noise reduction) significantly enhanced subjects’ performance in these challenging listening environments.

[1]  O. Mulla,et al.  Introducing the Sophono Alpha 1 abutment free bone conduction hearing system , 2012, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[2]  Sabine Reinfeldt,et al.  Feedback Analysis in Percutaneous Bone-Conduction Device and Bone-Conduction Implant on a Dry Cranium , 2012, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[3]  Rudolf Häusler,et al.  Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha® Compact and Baha Divino™ , 2007, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[4]  T. Lenarz,et al.  First European Multicenter Results With a New Transcutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Implant System: Short-Term Safety and Efficacy , 2013, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[5]  C. Röösli,et al.  The Bonebridge: Preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device , 2013, Hearing Research.

[6]  Karen A. Doherty,et al.  The Effect of Hearing Aid Noise Reduction on Listening Effort in Hearing-Impaired Adults , 2014, Ear and hearing.

[7]  Stacie Nordrum,et al.  Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms. , 2006, American journal of audiology.

[8]  Benjamin W Y Hornsby,et al.  The Effects of Digital Noise Reduction on the Acceptance of Background Noise , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[9]  Ruth Bentler,et al.  Digital Noise Reduction: An Overview , 2006, Trends in amplification.

[10]  M. Zernotti,et al.  Active Bone Conduction Prosthesis: BonebridgeTM , 2015, International archives of otorhinolaryngology.

[11]  Sumitrajit Dhar,et al.  Speech perception in noise using directional microphones in open-canal hearing aids. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[12]  Marco Caversaccio,et al.  Is complex signal processing for bone conduction hearing aids useful? , 2014, Cochlear implants international.

[13]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Kristi Oeding,et al.  Effectiveness of the Directional Microphone in the Baha® Divino™ Recommended Citation Effectiveness of the Directional Microphone in the Baha , 2022 .

[15]  Todd A Ricketts,et al.  Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing digital noise reduction. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[16]  M. Valente,et al.  The effectiveness of the directional microphone in the Oticon Medical Ponto Pro in participants with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[17]  K. Green,et al.  Complications of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation. , 2010, The Journal of laryngology and otology.

[19]  Robert J S Briggs,et al.  The Cochlear Baha 4 Attract System – design concepts, surgical technique and early clinical results , 2015, Expert review of medical devices.

[20]  Michael F Dorman,et al.  Development and Validation of the AzBio Sentence Lists , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[21]  Sheila Moodie,et al.  The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm , 2005, Trends in amplification.

[22]  Andrzej J. Zarowski,et al.  Comparison of the Audiologic Results Obtained With the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Attached to the Headband, the Testband, and to the "Snap" Abutment , 2009, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[23]  M. Davies,et al.  Endovascular treatment of tracheoinnominate artery fistula: a case report. , 2006, Vascular and endovascular surgery.

[24]  Robyn M. Cox,et al.  The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[25]  Todd A Ricketts,et al.  Directional hearing aids: then and now. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[26]  G. Sprinzl,et al.  The Bonebridge Bone Conduction Hearing Implant: indication criteria, surgery and a systematic review of the literature , 2016, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[27]  Julianne J. Tenhaaf,et al.  Stimuli and normative data for detection of Ling-6 sounds in hearing level. , 2012, American journal of audiology.

[28]  Eugene Brandewie,et al.  Prior listening in rooms improves speech intelligibility. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Peter F. Assmann,et al.  The Perception of Speech Under Adverse Conditions , 2004 .

[30]  Vijay Parsa,et al.  Fitting Noise Management Signal Processing Applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Verification Protocols. , 2016, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[31]  R. Bentler,et al.  Digital noise reduction: Outcomes from laboratory and field studies , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[32]  R. Bento,et al.  Bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA): indications, functional results, and comparison with reconstructive surgery of the ear , 2012, International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology.

[33]  Mark C Flynn,et al.  Benefits of directional microphones and noise reduction circuits for improving Baha® hearing performance , 2011, Cochlear implants international.