An available-to-promise system for TFT LCD manufacturing in supply chain

This paper presents development of an available-to-promise (ATP) system for thin film transistor liquid crystal display (TFT LCD) manufacturing in global supply chain environment where the worldwide headquarter, distribution centers, and manufacturing facilities are globally networked. ATP activity is simply to give the delivery date promise to customers for their specific orders. However, the ATP process is not simple due to the complexity of supply chain and information integrity. In this paper, we build up a global ATP system architecture whose functions and information flows are comprehensively defined. To do so, we developed an ATP model in a global supply chain for estimating the promising delivery date for new orders, and the capacity available-to-promise (CATP) model for calculating the unused production capacity at shop floor level with given production schedules. We proposed an efficient heuristic for scheduling TFT LCD module assembly process for effectively using the unused capacity at shop floor level. Efficiency of the scheduling system was investigated using the data collected in a real TFT LCD manufacturing site. The validity of the proposed ATP system was also explored by comparing with other ATP procedures including the current practice.

[1]  Linet Özdamar,et al.  Capacity driven due date settings in make-to-order production systems , 1997 .

[2]  Jatinder N. D. Gupta,et al.  A review of scheduling research involving setup considerations , 1999 .

[3]  A. Guinet Scheduling sequence-dependent jobs on identical parallel machines to minimize completion time criteria , 1993 .

[4]  Michael Pinedo,et al.  Scheduling jobs on parallel machines with sequence-dependent setup times , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Nico Dellaert Due-date setting and production control , 1991 .

[6]  Izak Duenyas,et al.  Single facility due date setting with multiple customer classes , 1995 .

[7]  M. M. Qiu,et al.  Application of hierarchical production planning in a multiproduct, multimachine environment , 2001 .

[8]  A. Guinet,et al.  Textile Production Systems: a Succession of Non-identical Parallel Processor Shops , 1991 .

[9]  Scott A. Moses,et al.  Due date assignment using feedback control with reinforcement learning , 1999 .

[10]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Due-date determination with resequencing , 1999 .

[11]  DHARMARAJ VEERAMANI,et al.  Methodologies for rapid and effective response to requests for quotation (RFQs) , 1997 .

[12]  B. G. Dale,et al.  The importance of lead time control in the order fulfilment process , 1998 .

[13]  Reha Uzsoy,et al.  Worst-case error bounds for parallel machine scheduling problems with bounded sequence-dependent setup times , 1993, Oper. Res. Lett..

[14]  R. Sumichrast,et al.  Scheduling parallel processors: An integer linear programming based heuristic for minimizing setup time , 1987 .

[15]  T.C.E. Cheng,et al.  Survey of scheduling research involving due date determination decisions , 1989 .

[16]  B. Beamon Supply chain design and analysis:: Models and methods , 1998 .

[17]  Z. Kevin Weng Strategies for integrating lead time and customer-order decisions , 1999 .

[18]  Asoo J. Vakharia,et al.  Integrated production/distribution planning in supply chains: An invited review , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Stephen R. Lawrence,et al.  Estimating flowtimes and setting due-dates in complex production systems , 1995 .

[20]  D. Clay Whybark,et al.  Global relations between inventory, manufacturing lead time and delivery date promises , 1993 .

[21]  Gerd Finke,et al.  An Integrated Model for an Industrial Production–Distribution Problem , 2001 .