Causality in qualitative and quantitative research

We are flooded with a wave of writings on causality in the social sciences during the last decades. The same holds for the relationship between quantitative and qualitative research in the social sciences. An enormous amount of texts appears on (causality in) qualitative research, mostly in a controversy with quantitative research. These writings induced us to develop the thesis of “unity in diversity”, i.e., that there is no difference “in principle” between causality in qualitative and quantitative research, because both are supported by what I will call an “experimental logic”. In developing this thesis a plea is being made for going back to the sources. A historical overview of theories of causality is presented, which develops into two prominent views: INUS-causation and causal realism. A historical framework is also outlined for the opposition between quantitative and qualitative research, in which French positivism and British empiricism are opposed to German neo-kantianism and neo-hegelianism. After having developed the thesis of “unity in diversity” for this historical framework, the same is being done for the recent literature: “mixed methods research”, the book DSI of KKV, the reactions of David Collier and “QCA” of Charles Ragin. At the end the question of small-n research and the case n = 1 is examined.

[1]  R. Bhaskar.  A realist theory of science , 1976 .

[2]  Immanuel Kant.  Kritik Der Reinen Vernunft , 2004 .

[3]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences. , 1974 .

[4]  R. Bhaskar,et al.  The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences , 1979 .

[5]  Donald Young,et al.  The Polish Peasant In Europe and America. , 1928 .

[6]  Harold I. Brown,et al.  Nature’s Capacities and their Measurement , 1991 .

[7]  Jon Elster,et al.  The Cement Of Society , 1991 .

[8]  J. Elster,et al.  The Cement Of Society , 1989 .

[9]  David Hume.  Philosophical essays concerning human understanding , 1986 .

[10]  J. Mackie,et al.  The cement of the universe : a study of causation , 1977 .

[11]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. , 1995 .

[12]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1959 .

[13]  K. Jöreskog.  A General Method for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System. , 1970 .

[14]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[15]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. , 1990 .

[16]  James Fieser,et al.  Essays and treatises on several subjects , 2000 .

[17]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[18]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[19]  T. Penelhum.  A Treatise of Human Nature (review) , 2000 .

[20]  S. Wright.  The Method of Path Coefficients , 1934 .

[21]  David Collier,et al.  Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards , 2004 .

[22]  N. D. Pidgen,et al.  The Comparative Method , 1987 .

[23]  E. Pols.  Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity , 1976 .

[24]  J. Earman,et al.  The Cement Of The Universe , 1974 .

[25]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[26]  Herbert Dingle,et al.  Causality—The Place of the Causal Principle in Modern Science , 1960 .

[27]  W. Thomas,et al.  The Polish Peasant in Europe and America , 1960 .

[28]  Florian Znaniecki,et al.  The method of sociology , 1934 .

[29]  Karl R. Popper,et al.  A Realist View of Logic, Physics, and History , 1970 .

[30]  N. Polsby,et al.  Case Study and Theory in Political Science , 1975 .

[31]  D. Collier,et al.  Insights and Pitfalls: Selection Bias in Qualitative Research , 1996, World Politics.

[32]  J. Woodward,et al.  Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World , 1988 .

[33]  Fred I. Greenstein,et al.  Handbook of political science , 1975 .

[34]  Kurt Weyland,et al.  Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[35]  C. Teddlie,et al.  SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .

[36]  John Gerring.  Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards . Edited by Henry Brady and David Collier. (Rowman and Littlefield, 2004.) , 2008 .

[37]  Florian Znaniecki,et al.  The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. , 1918 .

[38]  P. Suppes.  A Probabilistic Theory Of Causality , 1970 .

[39]  C. Hempel,et al.  Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. , 1966 .

[40]  Jacques Tacq,et al.  Causaliteit in sociologisch onderzoek , 1982 .

[41]  C. Whitbeck,et al.  A Realist Theory of Science. , 1977 .

[42]  M. Scriven,et al.  Explanation and prediction in evolutionary theory. , 1959, Science.

[43]  George R. Franke,et al.  HANDBOOK OF MIXED METHODS IN SOCIAL & BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (Book) , 2004 .

[44]  P. V. Parijs.  Theorie des catastrophes et materialisme historique , 1978 .

[45]  M. Bunge.  Causality : the place of the casual principle in modern science , 1959 .

[46]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Causal Models in the Social Sciences. , 1972 .

[47]  J. Elster,et al.  Nuts and bolts for the social sciences , 1989 .