Theoretical Framework of the iCampFolio - New Approach to Comparison and Selection of Systems and Tools for Learning Purposes

We argue that current selection methods and comparison approaches of tools for learning purposes do not fit with the concept of e-learning 2.0 and Web 2.0 applications for creating personal learning environments. Available comparison methods being mainly as black-and-white check lists hinder to see the properties of various Web 2.0 applications. We propose a theoretical framework for designing a support tool for learners as well as for facilitators in order to facilitate the choice of learning/teaching tools from heterogeneous technological landscapes. Our theoretical framework is based on soft ontological approach enabling to compare systems and tools from multidimensional perspectives taking into account users best practices. We focus on elements of learning activities mediated by technology with respect to the concept of affordances and activity theory in combination of Alexander's pattern approach and IMS LD case descriptions.

[1]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Usability - Turning Technologies into Tools , 1992 .

[2]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill , 1992, Usability - Turning Technologies into Tools.

[3]  Alain Derycke,et al.  Pedagogical Patterns and Learning Design: When Two Worlds Cooperate , 2003 .

[4]  K. Kuutti.  Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research , 1995 .

[5]  Rob Koper,et al.  Representing the Learning Design of Units of Learning , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[6]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[7]  Hanne Albrechtsen,et al.  Affordances in Activity Theory and Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2001 .

[8]  David Griffiths.  From Primitives to Patterns: A discussion paper , 2005 .

[9]  William W. Gaver,et al.  AFFORDANCES FOR INTERACTION: THE SOCIAL IS MATERIAL FOR DESIGN , 1996 .

[10]  Mauri Kaipainen,et al.  Soft ontologies and similarity cluster tools to facilitate exploration and discovery of cultural heritage resources , 2003, 14th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2003. Proceedings..

[11]  Joseph Bergin,et al.  A pattern language for initial course design , 2001, SIGCSE '01.

[12]  Massimo Ruzzene,et al.  . Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2007, ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Las Vegas NV, USA , 2007 .

[13]  George Siemens.  Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[14]  Betty Collis.  Pedagogical Reengineering: A Pedagogical Approach to Course Enrichment and Redesign with the World Wide Web. , 1997 .

[15]  Stephen Downes.  E-learning 2.0 , 2005, ELERN.

[16]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[17]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[18]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 1999 .

[19]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  The Relationship Between Function and Affordance , 2005 .

[20]  Joanna McGrenere,et al.  Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concep , 2000, Graphics Interface.

[21]  B. Nardi.  Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[22]  John C. Tang,et al.  Business activity patterns: A new model for collaborative business applications , 2006, IBM Syst. J..

[23]  Davinia Hernández Leo,et al.  IMS learning design support for the formalization of collaborative learning patterns , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings..

[24]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[25]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .