Historical Development of Power Use Methods for WDS Design and their Evolution towards Optimization Metaheuristics

Abstract This paper describes an extension to the Optimal Power Use Surface (OPUS) methodology, which consists in applying a metaheuristic post-optimization process after a network has been designed through the hydraulically-based OPUS algorithm. Once a set of diameter sizes is obtained by means of this hydraulic-based design methodology, it is used as the system's initial configuration for it to be post-optimized using different nondeterministic techniques. The metaheuristics tested in this study include 3 different types of Genetic Algorithms (GAs), Harmony Search (HS) and Simulated Annealing (SA). The proposed methodology is tested on three benchmark problems (Hanoi, Balerma, Taichung) and a fourth network called R28, which is introduced herein. When compared to the results obtained through other methodologies, this algorithm stands out for allowing designs with constructive costs very close to the lowest found in other investigations. However, the improvements with respect to the OPUS algorithm are very small, while the number of iterations required increases by more than 2 orders of magnitude. Moreover the Resilience Index (RI) increases in most cases as well. This extension to the OPUS methodology proves that following hydraulic principles allows obtaining near-optimal results, whose improvement demands a considerable number of iterations, providing minimum benefit as the reduction in cost is only of 1% at the most.

[1]  Z. Geem Particle-swarm harmony search for water network design , 2009 .

[2]  Zong Woo Geem,et al.  Harmony Search Optimization: Application to Pipe Network Design , 2002 .

[3]  Dragan Savic,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Least-Cost Design of Water Distribution Networks , 1997 .

[4]  I-pai Wu Design of Drip Irrigation Main Lines , 1975 .

[5]  Consolación Gil,et al.  Application of Several Meta-Heuristic Techniques to the Optimization of Real Looped Water Distribution Networks , 2008 .

[6]  Min-Der Lin,et al.  TABU SEARCH SOLUTION OF WATER DISTRIBUTION NETWORK OPTIMIZATION , 2007 .

[7]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[8]  Maria da Conceição Cunha,et al.  Water Distribution Network Design Optimization: Simulated Annealing Approach , 1999 .

[9]  Aaron C. Zecchin,et al.  Hybrid discrete dynamically dimensioned search (HD‐DDS) algorithm for water distribution system design optimization , 2009 .

[10]  Z. Geem Optimal Design of Water Distribution Networks Using Harmony Search , 2009 .

[11]  Yu-Hsin Liu,et al.  Scatter search heuristic for least-cost design of water distribution networks , 2007 .

[12]  S. Takahashi,et al.  An energy methodology for the design of water distribution systems. , 2010 .

[13]  Mohammed Ali,et al.  Pipe Index Vector: A Method to Improve Genetic-Algorithm-Based Pipe Optimization , 2005 .

[14]  A. Ostfeld,et al.  An adaptive heuristic cross-entropy algorithm for optimal design of water distribution systems , 2007 .

[15]  D. B. Khang,et al.  A two‐phase decomposition method for optimal design of looped water distribution networks , 1990 .

[16]  Juan Martínez,et al.  Genetic algorithms for the design of looped irrigation water distribution networks , 2006 .

[17]  Juan Saldarriaga,et al.  Optimal power use surface for design of water distribution systems , 2012 .

[18]  P. Bhave,et al.  Optimal Design of Water Networks Using a Modified Genetic Algorithm with Reduction in Search Space , 2008 .

[19]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.