Achieving efficiency and effectiveness in Purchasing and Supply Management: Organization design and outsourcing

Abstract As a function with a strategic role, Purchasing and Supply Management (PSM) needs to continuously find ways to improve its efficiency and effectiveness. One potential way to specifically addressing efficiency targets is to outsource parts of the purchasing process. While outsourcing remains one of the most prevalent business practices in various areas, many businesses fail to realize the benefits anticipated from their outsourcing initiatives. Research reports that one major reason for these outsourcing challenges lies in the design of the focal organization. In this paper, we take an organization design view to outsourcing in the PSM context. Based on a multi-year case study from 2010 to 2013 at a global chemical and pharmaceutical company, we elaborate how the organizational design of the PSM function relates to outsourcing opportunities in order to increase efficiency and effectiveness by allocating internal resources to more value-adding activities. The case illustrates how an activity-based organizational design of PSM can support outsourcing of some parts of the purchasing process.

[1]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Mediated power and outsourcing relationships , 2012 .

[2]  M. Leenders,et al.  The Supply Organizational Structure Dilemma , 2001 .

[3]  Andy A. Tsay,et al.  Safeguarding the Promise of Production Outsourcing , 2006, Interfaces.

[4]  Sean Handley.  The perilous effects of capability loss on outsourcing management and performance , 2012 .

[5]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Organizations: An Executive Guide to Strategy, Structure, and Process , 2001 .

[6]  Holger Schiele,et al.  Accessing Supplier Innovation By Being Their Preferred Customer , 2012 .

[7]  Maria Caridi,et al.  Environmental sustainability in fashion supply chains: An exploratory case based research , 2012 .

[8]  Riikka Kaipia,et al.  Managing integration in outsourcing relationships - The influence of cost and quality priorities , 2017 .

[9]  Ulli Arnold,et al.  Organization of global sourcing: ways towards an optimal degree of centralization , 1999 .

[10]  Carl Marcus Wallenburg,et al.  50 Years of research on organizing the purchasing function: Do we need any more? , 2013 .

[11]  K. Karjalainen,et al.  Estimating the cost effects of purchasing centralization—Empirical evidence from framework agreements in the public sector , 2011 .

[12]  R. McIvor.  A practical framework for understanding the outsourcing process , 2000 .

[13]  D. N. Tirimanne,et al.  Use of Organizational Design Features in Purchasing , 2008 .

[14]  Ronan McIvor,et al.  How the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm inform outsourcing evaluation , 2009 .

[15]  Michael Gibbert,et al.  From complexity to transparency: managing the interplay between theory, method and empirical phenomena in IMM case studies , 2010 .

[16]  A. Ishizaka,et al.  The 18C's model for a successful long-term outsourcing arrangement , 2012 .

[17]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  A Demand‐side Perspective on Supply Chain Management , 2012 .

[18]  Bryan Ashenbaum,et al.  Outsourcing the procurement function: Do actions and results align with theory? , 2014 .

[19]  C. Glock,et al.  Purchasing Organization and Design: A Literature Review , 2011 .

[20]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  The Influence of Cost and Quality Priorities on the Propensity to Outsource Production , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[21]  Lydia Bals,et al.  A processual analysis of the purchasing and supply organization in transition: the impact of offshoring , 2017 .

[22]  Asad Shafiq,et al.  Supply organizations in North America: A 24 year perspective on roles and responsibilities 1987–2011 , 2014 .

[23]  J. Barney.  Purchasing, Supply Chain Management and Sustained Competitive Advantage: The Relevance of Resource-based Theory , 2012 .

[24]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[25]  E. Hartmann,et al.  Top and bottom line relevance of purchasing and supply management , 2012 .

[26]  Adam Lindgreen,et al.  What makes a good case study? A positivist review of qualitative case research published in Industrial Marketing Management, 1971–2006 , 2010 .

[27]  Lydia Bals,et al.  Evolving procurement organizations: A contingency model for structural alternatives , 2015 .

[28]  G. Hoetker.  Do Modular Products Lead to Modular Organizations , 2006 .

[29]  Siri Terjesen,et al.  Cannot make do without you: Outsourcing by knowledge-intensive new firms in supplier networks , 2013 .

[30]  A. Weele,et al.  The Future of Purchasing and Supply Management Research: About Relevance and Rigor , 2014 .

[31]  Jan Holmström,et al.  Bridging Practice and Theory: A Design Science Approach , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[32]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  The Effect of Learning on the Make/Buy Decision , 2002 .

[33]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[34]  José F. Molina-Azorín,et al.  Competitive strategy, structure and firm performance , 2010 .

[35]  E. Hartmann,et al.  Global sourcing in integrated network structures: The case of hybrid purchasing organizations , 2009 .

[36]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Renaissance of case research as a scientific method , 2014 .

[37]  R. M. Monczka,et al.  Organizational approaches to managing international sourcing , 1990 .

[38]  Danny Miller,et al.  Tackling Design Anew: Getting Back to the Heart of Organizational Theory , 2010 .

[39]  Ulli Arnold.  New dimensions of outsourcing: a combination of transaction cost economics and the core competencies concept , 2000 .

[40]  R. Lamming,et al.  Global purchasing strategy and International Purchasing Offices: Evidence from case studies , 2014 .

[41]  Toward a Flexible Breathing Organization: R&D Outsourcing at Bayer , 2013 .

[42]  K. Foerstl,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the “Purchasing and Supply Management Practice–Performance Link” , 2014 .

[43]  John V. Gray,et al.  The Reshoring Phenomenon: What Supply Chain Academics Ought to know and Should Do , 2013 .

[44]  Larry C. Giunipero,et al.  Organisational Approaches to Managing International Sourcing , 1990 .

[45]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Outsourcing to a Powerful Contract Manufacturer: The Effect of Learning‐by‐Doing , 2009 .

[46]  J. Larson,et al.  An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations , 2015 .

[47]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[48]  A. Smart.  Operations, Strategy, and Technology: Pursuing the Competitive Edge , 2006 .

[49]  F. Robert Jacobs,et al.  Operations and supply management : the core , 2008 .

[50]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Inter‐temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification , 2004 .

[51]  Jean Nollet,et al.  Should an organisation join a purchasing group , 2005 .

[52]  Holger Schiele.  Early Supplier Integration: The Dual Role of Purchasing in New Product Development , 2010 .

[53]  L. Ellram,et al.  Outsourcing Supply Management , 1999 .

[54]  Sungmin Ryu,et al.  A cross-national study of manufacturer's power structures and control mechanisms: The moderating effect of group orientation culture , 2008 .

[55]  W. C. Benton,et al.  The influence of task- and location-specific complexity on the control and coordination costs in global outsourcing relationships , 2013 .

[56]  Chris J. Sablynski,et al.  Qualitative Research in Organizational and Vocational Psychology, 1979–1999 , 1999 .

[57]  Mei Li,et al.  Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications , 2011 .

[58]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[59]  E. Hartmann,et al.  INTEGRATION IN THE GLOBAL SOURCING ORGANIZATION — AN INFORMATION PROCESSING PERSPECTIVE , 2009 .

[60]  Christian Geisler Asmussen,et al.  Organizational Adaptation in Offshoring: The Relative Performance of Home- and Host-Based Learning Strategies , 2016, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Bryan Ashenbaum,et al.  Understanding the Supply Chain Outsourcing Cascade: When Does Procurement Follow Manufacturing Out the Door? , 2013 .

[62]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[63]  Ram Narasimhan,et al.  Explicating the mediating role of integrative supply management practices in strategic outsourcing: a case study analysis , 2010 .

[64]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Unlocking the business outsourcing process model , 2009 .

[65]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  RETROSPECTIVE REPORTS IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH: A REEXAMINATION OF RECENT EVIDENCE , 1997 .

[66]  M. Swink,et al.  Supply Chain Personnel as Knowledge Resources for Innovation—A Contingency View , 2017 .

[67]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[68]  Rachel Q. Zhang,et al.  Should purchasing activities be outsourced along with production? , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[69]  Glenn Parry,et al.  Outsourcing engineering commodity procurement , 2006 .

[70]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems , 2013, MIS Q..

[71]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  Rapid-Response Capability in Value-Chain Design , 2002 .

[72]  Mario Benassi,et al.  Investigating modular organizations , 2009 .

[73]  Lisa M. Ellram,et al.  Purchasing leverage considerations in the outsourcing decision , 2001 .

[74]  J. R. Carter,et al.  Organisation, Communication and Co‐ordination of International Sourcing , 1990 .

[75]  James R. Kroes,et al.  Outsourcing congruence with competitive priorities: Impact on supply chain and firm performance , 2010 .