Adaptation of PWAS transducers to acoustic emission sensors

Piezoelectric wafer active sensors (PWAS) are non-intrusive transducers that can convert mechanical energy into electrical energy, and vice versa. They are well known for their dual use as either actuators or sensors. Though PWAS has shown great potential for active sensing, its capability for acoustic emission (AE) detection has not yet been exploited. In the reported work, we have explored the implementation of PWAS transducers for both passive (AE sensors) and active (in-situ ultrasonic transducers) sensing using a single PWAS network. The objective of the work presented in this paper is to adapt PWAS as AE sensors and compare it to the commercially available AE transducers such as PAC R15. An experiment has been designed to show how PWAS can be used for AE detection and the results were compared to a standard AE sensor, PAC R15I. Tests on compact tension specimens have also been conducted to show PWAS capability to pick up AE events during fatigue loading. PWAS field installation technology has been tested with packaging similar to that used for traditional strain gauges. The performance of packaged PWAS has been compared with that of conventional AE transducers R15I. We have found that PWAS not only can detect the presence of AE events but also can provide a wide frequency bandwidth. At this stage, PWAS underperforms the commercial AE sensors. To make PWAS ready for field test, signal to noise ratio needs to be significantly improved.

[1]  Daining Fang,et al.  Study of fatigue crack characteristics by acoustic emission , 1995 .

[2]  Paul Ziehl Applications of acoustic emission evaluation for civil infrastructure , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[3]  R. Stephens,et al.  Constant and variable amplitude fatigue behavior and fracture of A572 steel at 25°C(77°F) and −45°C(−50°F) , 1982 .

[4]  M. N. Bassim,et al.  Acoustic emission mechanisms during high-cycle fatigue , 1981 .

[5]  Jonathan Awerbuch,et al.  Acoustic emission during fatigue of Ti-6Al-4V: Incipient fatigue crack detection limits and generalized data analysis methodology , 1992 .

[6]  M. N. Bassim,et al.  Detection of the onset of fatigue crack growth in rail steels using acoustic emission , 1994 .

[7]  S. Smith,et al.  Acoustic-emission detection techniques for high-cycle-fatigue testing , 1973 .

[8]  Z. Gong,et al.  ACOUSTIC EMISSION MONITORING OF STEEL RAILROAD BRIDGES , 1992 .

[9]  Christopher A. Martin,et al.  Acoustic emission testing on an F/A-18 E/F titanium bulkhead , 1995, Smart Structures.

[10]  C. E. Richards,et al.  Acoustic emission monitoring of fatigue crack growth , 1978 .

[11]  C. G. Sifniotopoulos,et al.  Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Fatigue Damage in Metals , 1998 .

[12]  Hung-Liang Chen,et al.  Acoustic Emission Study of Fatigue Cracks in Materials Used for AVLB , 2004 .

[13]  Isaac M. Daniel,et al.  Acoustic Emission Monitoring of Fatigue Damage in Metals , 1998 .

[14]  J. Awerbuch,et al.  Acoustic emission during fatigue of Ti-6Al-4V: Incipient fatigue crack detection limits and generalized data analysis methodology , 1992 .

[15]  Kyung Seop Han,et al.  Acoustic Emission Behavior during Fatigue Crack Propagation in 304 Stainless Steel , 2003 .

[16]  D. C. Connors,et al.  Acoustic emission analysis during fatigue crack growth in steel , 1977 .

[17]  M. Armeite,et al.  Relation between Amplitude and Duration of Acoustic Emission Signals , 2003 .