A Probabilistic Atlas of Diffuse WHO Grade II Glioma Locations in the Brain

Diffuse WHO grade II gliomas are diffusively infiltrative brain tumors characterized by an unavoidable anaplastic transformation. Their management is strongly dependent on their location in the brain due to interactions with functional regions and potential differences in molecular biology. In this paper, we present the construction of a probabilistic atlas mapping the preferential locations of diffuse WHO grade II gliomas in the brain. This is carried out through a sparse graph whose nodes correspond to clusters of tumors clustered together based on their spatial proximity. The interest of such an atlas is illustrated via two applications. The first one correlates tumor location with the patient’s age via a statistical analysis, highlighting the interest of the atlas for studying the origins and behavior of the tumors. The second exploits the fact that the tumors have preferential locations for automatic segmentation. Through a coupled decomposed Markov Random Field model, the atlas guides the segmentation process, and characterizes which preferential location the tumor belongs to and consequently which behavior it could be associated to. Leave-one-out cross validation experiments on a large database highlight the robustness of the graph, and yield promising segmentation results.

[1]  R Grant,et al.  Guidelines on management of low‐grade gliomas: report of an EFNS–EANO * Task Force , 2010, European journal of neurology.

[2]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies , 2011, NeuroImage.

[3]  H Duffau,et al.  Improving the time‐machine: estimating date of birth of grade II gliomas , 2012, Cell proliferation.

[4]  Christian Hartmann,et al.  IDH1/2 mutations in WHO grade II astrocytomas associated with localization and seizure as the initial symptom , 2012, Seizure.

[5]  Guido Gerig,et al.  A brain tumor segmentation framework based on outlier detection , 2004, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Gustavo Carneiro,et al.  A Discriminative Model-Constrained Graph Cuts Approach to Fully Automated Pediatric Brain Tumor Segmentation in 3-D MRI , 2008, MICCAI.

[7]  I. Yang,et al.  Awake surgery for WHO grade II gliomas within “noneloquent” areas in the left dominant hemisphere: toward a “supratotal” resection , 2012 .

[8]  H. Duffau Lessons from brain mapping in surgery for low-grade glioma: insights into associations between tumour and brain plasticity , 2005, The Lancet Neurology.

[9]  H Duffau,et al.  Correlations between molecular profile and radiologic pattern in oligodendroglial tumors , 2004, Neurology.

[10]  Mark W. Schmidt,et al.  Segmenting Brain Tumors with Conditional Random Fields and Support Vector Machines , 2005, CVBIA.

[11]  Chi-Hoon Lee,et al.  Segmenting Brain Tumors Using Pseudo-Conditional Random Fields , 2008, MICCAI.

[12]  Hugues Duffau,et al.  Awake surgery for WHO Grade II gliomas within "noneloquent" areas in the left dominant hemisphere: toward a "supratotal" resection. Clinical article. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  Graph Based Spatial Position Mapping of Low-grade Gliomas , 2013 .

[14]  Ben Glocker,et al.  Graphical Models and Deformable Diffeomorphic Population Registration Using Global and Local Metrics , 2009, MICCAI.

[15]  Nikhil R. Pal,et al.  Cluster validation using graph theoretic concepts , 1997, Pattern Recognit..

[16]  Cristina Garc Kernel Based Method for Segmentation and Modeling of Magnetic Resonance Images , 2004 .

[17]  Geirmund Unsgård,et al.  Comparison of a strategy favoring early surgical resection vs a strategy favoring watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. , 2012, JAMA.

[18]  Yanxi Liu,et al.  Computer Vision for Biomedical Image Applications, First International Workshop, CVBIA 2005, Beijing, China, October 21, 2005, Proceedings , 2005, CVBIA.

[19]  Nikos Paragios,et al.  Concurrent tumor segmentation and registration with uncertainty-based sparse non-uniform graphs , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  Zhongli Jiang,et al.  Co-Deletion of Chromosome 1p/19q and IDH1/2 Mutation in Glioma Subsets of Brain Tumors in Chinese Patients , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  C. Kruchko,et al.  CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2005-2009. , 2012, Neuro-oncology.

[22]  H. Duffau,et al.  Lack of complete 1p19q deletion in a consecutive series of 12 WHO grade II gliomas involving the insula: a marker of worse prognosis? , 2008, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[23]  C. Almli,et al.  Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood , 2009, NeuroImage.

[24]  J. Friedman Special Invited Paper-Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting , 2000 .

[25]  Laurent Capelle,et al.  Preferential brain locations of low‐grade gliomas , 2004, Cancer.

[26]  Kai-Kuang Ma,et al.  Tumor segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging by learning via one-class support vector machine , 2004 .

[27]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Automatic brain tumor segmentation by subject specific modification of atlas priors. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[28]  Stefan Bauer,et al.  Fully Automatic Segmentation of Brain Tumor Images Using Support Vector Machine Classification in Combination with Hierarchical Conditional Random Field Regularization , 2011, MICCAI.

[29]  Donald W. Bouldin,et al.  A Cluster Separation Measure , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[30]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Dense image registration through MRFs and efficient linear programming , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[31]  Vladimir Kolmogorov,et al.  Feature Correspondence Via Graph Matching: Models and Global Optimization , 2008, ECCV.

[32]  Gareth Funka-Lea,et al.  Graph Cuts and Efficient N-D Image Segmentation , 2006, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[33]  Nikos Komodakis,et al.  Clustering via LP-based Stabilities , 2008, NIPS.

[34]  Hongmin Cai,et al.  Multiparametric tissue characterization of brain neoplasms and their recurrence using pattern classification of MR images. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[35]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Model-based brain and tumor segmentation , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[36]  H. Duffau,et al.  French Brain Tumor DataBase: 5‐Year Histological Results on 25 756 Cases , 2011, Brain pathology.

[37]  Luc Taillandier,et al.  Spontaneous and therapeutic prognostic factors in adult hemispheric World Health Organization Grade II gliomas: a series of 1097 cases: clinical article. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.

[38]  Rodney A Gabriel,et al.  Supratentorial cavernous malformations in eloquent and deep locations: surgical approaches and outcomes. Clinical article. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery.

[39]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS) , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[40]  Jesus A. Gonzalez,et al.  Advances in Artificial Intelligence – IBERAMIA 2004 , 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[41]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  A Generative Model for Brain Tumor Segmentation in Multi-Modal Images , 2010, MICCAI.

[42]  José Alí Moreno,et al.  Kernel Based Method for Segmentation and Modeling of Magnetic Resonance Images , 2004, IBERAMIA.

[43]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Recognizing Deviations from Normalcy for Brain Tumor Segmentation , 2002, MICCAI.

[44]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Automated segmentation of MR images of brain tumors. , 2001, Radiology.

[45]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  Efficient Multilevel Brain Tumor Segmentation With Integrated Bayesian Model Classification , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[46]  Elsa D. Angelini,et al.  Evidence for potentials and limitations of brain plasticity using an atlas of functional resectability of WHO grade II gliomas: Towards a “minimal common brain” , 2011, NeuroImage.

[47]  O. Chinot,et al.  Absence of IDH mutation identifies a novel radiologic and molecular subtype of WHO grade II gliomas with dismal prognosis , 2010, Acta Neuropathologica.

[48]  Nikos Komodakis,et al.  Performance vs computational efficiency for optimizing single and dynamic MRFs: Setting the state of the art with primal-dual strategies , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[49]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A Review of Methods for Correction of Intensity Inhomogeneity in MRI , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[50]  P. Rousseeuw Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[51]  M. Desmurget,et al.  Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[52]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Joint Segmentation and Deformable Registration of Brain Scans Guided by a Tumor Growth Model , 2011, MICCAI.

[53]  J. Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011. , 2012, Neuro-oncology.

[54]  J. Dunn Well-Separated Clusters and Optimal Fuzzy Partitions , 1974 .

[55]  Hugues Duffau,et al.  Surgery of low-grade gliomas: towards a ‘functional neurooncology’ , 2009, Current opinion in oncology.

[56]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Texture Features for Browsing and Retrieval of Image Data , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[57]  William M. Wells,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI’98 , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.