Variability in reading ability gains as a function of computer-assisted instruction method of presentation

This study examines the effects on early reading skills of three different methods of presenting material with computer-assisted instruction (CAI): (1) learner-controlled picture menu, which allows the student to choose activities, (2) linear sequencer, which progresses the students through lessons at a pre-specified pace, and (3) mastery-based adaptive sequencer, which progresses students through lessons based on whether or not the student has mastered the given skill. Preschool- and kindergarten-aged children (n=183) were randomly assigned to one of the three CAI groups and spent 40min a week, for 13weeks, using the software program in a computer lab. An additional control group of students attending typical preschool or kindergarten received no CAI. ANCOVA results examining post-test reading ability sum score, covarying pre-test score, indicated that the mastery-based sequencer group significantly outperformed the learner-control and control groups, but was not statistically different from the linear sequence group. Analysis by task, rather than overall reading score, revealed significantly better performance for the linear sequence group over controls and picture menu group on the Initial Sound Fluency task, while the mastery-based sequencer group outperformed all three other groups on Non Word Fluency. In sum, these results suggest that the use of a sequencer is a very important element in presenting computerized reading content for young children.

[1]  A. Graesser,et al.  Handbook of discourse processes , 2003 .

[2]  Marshall Arlin,et al.  Time, Equality, and Mastery Learning , 1984 .

[3]  Xiaoming Li,et al.  Early Childhood Computer Experience and Cognitive Development among Urban Low-Income Preschoolers , 2008 .

[4]  Scott W. Brown,et al.  Learner-Control: The Effects on Learning a Procedural Task During Computer-Based Videodisc Instruction. , 1995 .

[5]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Learning From Traditional and Alternative Texts: New Conceptualizations for the Information Age , 2003 .

[6]  J. A. Campanizzi.  Effects of Locus of Control and Provision of Overviews in a Computer-Assisted Instruction Sequence , 1978 .

[7]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Technology Applications for Students with Literacy Problems: A Critical Review , 2001, The Elementary School Journal.

[8]  M. E. Otter,et al.  Computer-Assisted Instruction in Support of Beginning Reading Instruction: A Review , 2002 .

[9]  Philip C. Abrami,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial Study of the ABRACADABRA Reading Intervention Program in Grade 1. , 2009 .

[10]  Ok-Choon Park,et al.  Adaptive Instructional Systems , 2007 .

[11]  R. Mayer,et al.  The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning , 1992 .

[12]  A. Bus,et al.  The Promise of Multimedia Stories for Kindergarten Children At Risk , 2006 .

[13]  Pieter Reitsma,et al.  Effects of Computer-Assisted Training of Blending Skills in Kindergartners , 1998 .

[14]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  The elaboration theory of instruction , 1983 .

[15]  K. Scheiter,et al.  Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments , 2007 .

[16]  Kelli C. Foster.  Computer Administered Instruction in Phonological Awareness: Evaluation of the DaisyQuest Program. , 1994 .

[17]  Pamela E. Hook,et al.  The Efficacy of Computer-Based Supplementary Phonics Programs for Advancing Reading Skills in At-Risk Elementary Students* , 2006 .

[18]  Liesbeth Kester,et al.  Towards a personalized task selection model with shared instructional control , 2006 .

[19]  Fred Paas,et al.  Instructional design for advanced learners: Establishing connections between the theoretical frameworks of cognitive load and deliberate practice , 2005 .

[20]  Clare Wood,et al.  Understanding the nature and impact of young readers' literacy interactions with talking books and during adult reading support , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Yavuz Erdogan,et al.  A Meta Analysis on the Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction: Turkey Sample , 2008 .

[22]  W. M. Reed,et al.  The effects of learning style and hypermedia prior experience on behavioral disorders knowledge and time on task: a case-based hypermedia environment , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  M. Lepper,et al.  Children and computers. Approaching the twenty-first century. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[24]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional Design Theories and Models : An Overview of Their Current Status , 1983 .

[25]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of Mastery Learning Programs: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[26]  M. Merrill.  Learner control: Beyond aptitude-treatment interactions , 1975 .

[27]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[28]  Lawrence L. Smith,et al.  The Impact of a Structured Integrated Learning System on First-Grade Students' Reading Gains , 2005 .

[29]  Lorin W. Anderson,et al.  Mastery learning in classroom instruction , 1975 .

[30]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[31]  B. Bloom.  The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[32]  William J. Sumrall,et al.  Mastery Learning and Contemporary Issues in Education , 2000 .

[33]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[34]  P. Hutinger,et al.  Disseminating and Replicating an Effective Emerging Literacy Technology Curriculum: A Final Report. , 2005 .

[35]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Learner Control and Achievement in Science Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 1988 .

[36]  Steven A Hecht,et al.  Emergent literacy skills and training time uniquely predict variability in responses to phonemic awareness training in disadvantaged kindergartners. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[37]  Barbara J. Fox,et al.  The effects of computer software for developing phonological awareness in low‐progress readers , 2001 .

[38]  M. David Merrill.  Learner control in computer based learning , 1980 .

[39]  Heidi J. Stevenson.  EVALUATION OF THE WATERFORD EARLY READING PROGRAM IN PRE-KINDERGARTEN 2005-2006 , 2006 .

[40]  KIMBERLY A. LAWLESS,et al.  Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation , 1997 .

[41]  Edwin P. Christmann,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Comparison of the Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Elementary Students' , 2003 .

[42]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition , 1998 .

[43]  Christopher J. Lonigan,et al.  A Computer-Assisted Instruction Phonological Sensitivity Program for Preschool Children At-Risk for Reading Problems , 2003 .

[44]  Maria K. DiBenedetto,et al.  Mastery learning and assessment: Implications for students and teachers in an era of high‐stakes testing , 2008 .

[45]  Paul Macaruso,et al.  The Efficacy of Computer-Assisted Instruction for Advancing Literacy Skills in Kindergarten Children , 2008 .

[46]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[47]  B. Bloom.  Learning for Mastery. Instruction and Curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1. , 1968 .

[48]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[49]  A. Montazemi,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of CBI in Support of Mastery Learning , 1995 .

[50]  A. Dillon,et al.  Hypermedia as an Educational Technology: A Review of the Quantitative Research Literature on Learner Comprehension, Control, and Style , 1998 .

[51]  R. Olson,et al.  Individual differences in gains from computer-assisted remedial reading. , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[52]  Danielle S. McNamara,et al.  Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence , 1996 .

[53]  Kyle Higgins,et al.  Hypermedia pre-reading lessons: learner-centered software for kindergarten , 1996 .

[54]  J. Carroll.  A Model of School Learning , 1963, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[55]  Carol Bell,et al.  Establishing and Maintaining an Early Childhood Emergent Literacy Technology Curriculum , 2006 .

[56]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[57]  Susan H. Gray,et al.  The effect of sequence control on computer assisted learning , 1987 .

[58]  Stephen A. Anderson.  Synthesis of Research on Mastery Learning. , 1994 .

[59]  Harold H. Wenglinsky.  Does It Compute? The Relationship between Educational Technology and Student Achievement in Mathematics. , 1998 .

[60]  Allan Collins,et al.  Design Issues for Learning Environments. , 1993 .

[61]  G Willems,et al.  Learner-control vs. program-control instructional multimedia: a comparison of two interactions when teaching principles of orthodontic appliances. , 2005, European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe.

[62]  Theodore J. Kopcha,et al.  Learner preferences and prior knowledge in learner-controlled computer-based instruction , 2008 .

[63]  David M. Moore,et al.  The Effect of Navigation Tools on Learners' Achievement and Attitude in a Hypermedia Environment , 1999 .

[64]  R. Snow.  Aptitude, learner control, and adaptive instruction , 1980 .

[65]  Wilhelmina C. Savenye,et al.  Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students' learning in a hypertext environment , 1994 .

[66]  Lawrence L. Smith,et al.  The Impact of a Reading-Focused Integrated Learning System on Phonological Awareness in Kindergarten , 2003 .

[67]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  A framework for the study of hypertext , 1994 .

[68]  Scott W. Brown,et al.  Learner Control versus Program Control in Interactive Videodisc Instruction: What Are the Effects in Procedural Learning?. , 1992 .

[69]  E. Palmer,et al.  Computer‐aided learning: an overvalued educational resource? , 1999, Medical education.

[70]  Carole Torgerson,et al.  Is an intervention using computer software effective in literacy learning? A randomised controlled trial , 2006 .

[71]  Diane Pedrotty Bryant,et al.  Analysis of studies of the effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance of students with learning disabilities , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[72]  E. Broadway,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE WATERFORD EARLY READING PROGRAM IN KINDERGARTEN , 2006 .

[73]  J. Ronald Gentile,et al.  Classroom Assessment and Grading to Assure Mastery , 2009 .