Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture Improves the Hemodynamic Results of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Background— Valve-in-valve (VIV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be less effective in small surgical valves because of patient/prosthesis mismatch. Bioprosthetic valve fracture (BVF) using a high-pressure balloon can be performed to facilitate VIV TAVR. Methods and Results— We report data from 20 consecutive clinical cases in which BVF was successfully performed before or after VIV TAVR by inflation of a high-pressure balloon positioned across the valve ring during rapid ventricular pacing. Hemodynamic measurements and calculation of the valve effective orifice area were performed at baseline, immediately after VIV TAVR, and after BVF. BVF was successfully performed in 20 patients undergoing VIV TAVR with balloon-expandable (n=8) or self-expanding (n=12) transcatheter valves in Mitroflow, Carpentier-Edwards Perimount, Magna and Magna Ease, Biocor Epic and Biocor Epic Supra, and Mosaic surgical valves. Successful fracture was noted fluoroscopically when the waist of the balloon released and by a sudden drop in inflation pressure, often accompanied by an audible snap. BVF resulted in a reduction in the mean transvalvular gradient (from 20.5±7.4 to 6.7±3.7 mm Hg, P<0.001) and an increase in valve effective orifice area (from 1.0±0.4 to 1.8±0.6 cm2, P<0.001). No procedural complications were reported. Conclusions— BVF can be performed safely in small surgical valves to facilitate VIV TAVR with either balloon-expandable or self-expanding transcatheter valves and results in reduced residual transvalvular gradients and increased valve effective orifice area.

[1]  D. Dvir,et al.  Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture to Facilitate Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation. , 2017, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  V. Falk,et al.  Wrinkles, folds and calcifications: Reduced durability after transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve replacement. , 2017, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  M. Gewillig,et al.  Cracking a tricuspid perimount bioprosthesis to optimize a second transcatheter sapien valve‐in‐valve placement , 2016, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[4]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Predictors and Outcomes of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[5]  M. Mack,et al.  Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  C. Terkelsen,et al.  Fracturing the Ring of Small Mitroflow Bioprostheses by High-Pressure Balloon Predilatation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Implantation. , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  P. Ewert,et al.  Cracking the ring of Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis with ultrahigh pressure balloons prior to transcatheter valve in valve implantation. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[8]  M. Pasic,et al.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. , 2014, JAMA.

[9]  H. Figulla,et al.  Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the new playground for prosthesis-patient mismatch. , 2014, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[10]  Maurice Buchbinder,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  W. Keeling,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery , 2011 .

[12]  S. Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  S. Rahimtoola,et al.  The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. , 1978, Circulation.