Functional network connectivity is altered in patients with upper limb somatosensory impairments in the acute phase post stroke: A cross-sectional study

Background Aberrant functional connectivity in brain networks associated with motor impairment after stroke is well described, but little is known about the association with somatosensory impairments. Aim The objective of this cross-sectional observational study was to investigate the relationship between brain functional connectivity and severity of somatosensory impairments in the upper limb in the acute phase post stroke. Methods Nineteen first-ever stroke patients underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) and a standardized clinical somatosensory profile assessment (exteroception and higher cortical somatosensation) in the first week post stroke. Integrity of inter- and intrahemispheric (ipsilesional and contralesional) functional connectivity of the somatosensory network was assessed between patients with severe (Em-NSA< 13/32) and mild to moderate (Em-NSA> 13/32) somatosensory impairments. Results Patients with severe somatosensory impairments displayed significantly lower functional connectivity indices in terms of interhemispheric (p = 0.001) and ipsilesional intrahemispheric (p = 0.035) connectivity compared to mildly to moderately impaired patients. Significant associations were found between the perceptual threshold of touch assessment and interhemispheric (r = -0.63) and ipsilesional (r = -0.51) network indices. Additional significant associations were found between the index of interhemispheric connectivity and light touch (r = 0.55) and stereognosis (r = 0.64) evaluation. Conclusion Patients with more severe somatosensory impairments have lower inter- and ipsilesional intrahemispheric connectivity of the somatosensory network. Lower connectivity indices are related to more impaired exteroception and higher cortical somatosensation. This study highlights the importance of network integrity in terms of inter- and ipsilesional intrahemispheric connectivity for somatosensory function. Further research is needed investigating the effect of therapy on the re-establishment of these networks.

[1]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Biomarkers of Stroke Recovery: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable* , 2017, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[2]  L. Cohen,et al.  Biomarkers of stroke recovery: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable , 2017, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[3]  N. Ramsey,et al.  No changes in functional connectivity during motor recovery beyond 5 weeks after stroke; A longitudinal resting-state fMRI study , 2017, PloS one.

[4]  Antonello Baldassarre,et al.  Brain connectivity and neurological disorders after stroke. , 2016, Current opinion in neurology.

[5]  Hai Li,et al.  Altered Resting-State Signals in Patients with Acute Stroke In or Under the Thalamus , 2016, Neuroscience Bulletin.

[6]  Hilde Feys,et al.  Somatosensory Impairments in the Upper Limb Poststroke , 2016, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[7]  Antonello Baldassarre,et al.  Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Antonello Baldassarre,et al.  Dissociated functional connectivity profiles for motor and attention deficits in acute right-hemisphere stroke. , 2016, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Hilde Feys,et al.  Associations Between Sensorimotor Impairments in the Upper Limb at 1 Week and 6 Months After Stroke , 2016, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[10]  Yajing Pang,et al.  Altered Intrinsic Regional Activity and Interregional Functional Connectivity in Post-stroke Aphasia , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Chunshui Yu,et al.  Contrasting Evolutionary Patterns of Functional Connectivity in Sensorimotor and Cognitive Regions after Stroke , 2016, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[12]  Jeffrey M Yau,et al.  Neurophysiology of Tactile Perception : A Tribute to Steven Hsiao Feeling form : the neural basis of haptic shape perception , 2016 .

[13]  Taim A. Muayqil.  Cognitive impairment , 2016, Neurosciences.

[14]  Petra Schmalbrock,et al.  Frontoparietal white matter integrity predicts haptic performance in chronic stroke , 2015, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[15]  G. Fink,et al.  Identifying Neuroimaging Markers of Motor Disability in Acute Stroke by Machine Learning Techniques. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Leeanne M. Carey,et al.  Improvement in Touch Sensation after Stroke is Associated with Resting Functional Connectivity Changes , 2015, Front. Neurol..

[17]  Chunshui Yu,et al.  Enhanced Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity Compensates for Anatomical Connection Damages in Subcortical Stroke , 2015, Stroke.

[18]  H. Dinse,et al.  Resting BOLD fluctuations in the primary somatosensory cortex correlate with tactile acuity , 2015, Cortex.

[19]  Y. Hara.  Brain plasticity and rehabilitation in stroke patients. , 2015, Journal of Nippon Medical School = Nippon Ika Daigaku zasshi.

[20]  Shahabeddin Vahdat,et al.  Structural and Resting-State Brain Connectivity of Motor Networks After Stroke , 2015, Stroke.

[21]  AlexanderThiel,et al.  Structural and Resting-State Brain Connectivity of Motor Networks After Stroke , 2015 .

[22]  G. Zaharchuk,et al.  Assessment and modulation of resting-state neural networks after stroke. , 2014, Current opinion in neurology.

[23]  G. Fink,et al.  Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[24]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Resting-state fMRI confounds and cleanup , 2013, NeuroImage.

[25]  J. Shimony,et al.  Resting-State fMRI: A Review of Methods and Clinical Applications , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[26]  R. Cameron Craddock,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of regional variation in the impact of head micromovements on functional connectomics , 2013, NeuroImage.

[27]  P. Schmalbrock,et al.  Sensorimotor training and neural reorganization after stroke: a case series. , 2013, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[28]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A quantitative meta-analysis and review of motor learning in the human brain , 2013, NeuroImage.

[29]  Ali-Mohammad Golestani,et al.  Longitudinal Evaluation of Resting-State fMRI After Acute Stroke With Hemiparesis , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[30]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  An improved framework for confound regression and filtering for control of motion artifact in the preprocessing of resting-state functional connectivity data , 2013, NeuroImage.

[31]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Why use a connectivity-based approach to study stroke and recovery of function? , 2012, NeuroImage.

[32]  Susan L. Whitfield-Gabrieli,et al.  Conn: A Functional Connectivity Toolbox for Correlated and Anticorrelated Brain Networks , 2012, Brain Connect..

[33]  N. Takeuchi,et al.  Maladaptive Plasticity for Motor Recovery after Stroke: Mechanisms and Approaches , 2012, Neural plasticity.

[34]  D. Sommerfeld,et al.  Adult norms of the perceptual threshold of touch (PTT) in the hands and feet in relation to age, gender, and right and left side using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation , 2012, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[35]  Max A Viergever,et al.  Extent of Bilateral Neuronal Network Reorganization and Functional Recovery in Relation to Stroke Severity , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Spatial neglect and attention networks. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[37]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Longitudinal Changes of Resting-State Functional Connectivity During Motor Recovery After Stroke , 2011, Stroke.

[38]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  The role of the contralesional motor cortex for motor recovery in the early days after stroke assessed with longitudinal FMRI. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling of cortical activity from the acute to the chronic stage after stroke , 2011, NeuroImage.

[40]  G. Fink,et al.  Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  Srikantan S. Nagarajan,et al.  Functional Connectivity in Relation to Motor Performance and Recovery After Stroke , 2011, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[42]  Liang Wang,et al.  Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[43]  M. Viergever,et al.  Recovery of Sensorimotor Function after Experimental Stroke Correlates with Restoration of Resting-State Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[45]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Changes in Resting State Effective Connectivity in the Motor Network Following Rehabilitation of Upper Extremity Poststroke Paresis , 2009, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[46]  Mi Young Lee,et al.  The comparison of cortical activation patterns by active exercise, proprioceptive input, and touch stimulation in the human brain: a functional MRI study. , 2009, NeuroRehabilitation.

[47]  D. Auer.  Spontaneous low-frequency blood oxygenation level-dependent fluctuations and functional connectivity analysis of the 'resting' brain. , 2008, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[48]  F. Chollet,et al.  Neural Correlates of Proprioceptive Integration in the Contralesional Hemisphere of Very Impaired Patients Shortly After a Subcortical Stroke: An fMRI Study , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[49]  John D E Gabrieli,et al.  Gray Matter Atrophy in Patients With Ischemic Stroke With Cognitive Impairment , 2008, Stroke.

[50]  Thomas T. Liu,et al.  A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[51]  H. C. Dijkerman,et al.  Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[52]  Biyu J. He,et al.  Breakdown of Functional Connectivity in Frontoparietal Networks Underlies Behavioral Deficits in Spatial Neglect , 2007, Neuron.

[53]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  fMRI resting state networks define distinct modes of long-distance interactions in the human brain , 2006, NeuroImage.

[55]  B. C. Harmeling-van der Wel,et al.  The Erasmus MC modifications to the (revised) Nottingham Sensory Assessment: a reliable somatosensory assessment measure for patients with intracranial disorders , 2006, Clinical rehabilitation.

[56]  M. Engardt,et al.  Assessment of the perceptual threshold of touch (PTT) with high-frequency transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (Hf/TENS) in elderly patients with stroke: a reliability study , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[57]  Scott E Kasner,et al.  Utility of the NIH Stroke Scale as a Predictor of Hospital Disposition , 2003, Stroke.

[58]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Spatial Normalization of Brain Images with Focal Lesions Using Cost Function Masking , 2001, NeuroImage.

[59]  C. Gaubert,et al.  Inter-rater reliability of the Nottingham method of stereognosis assessment , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[60]  J S Kim,et al.  Discriminative sensory dysfunction after unilateral stroke. , 1996, Stroke.

[61]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[62]  Nadina B. Lincoln,et al.  The unreliability of sensory assessments , 1991 .

[63]  E. Moberg,et al.  Two-point discrimination test. A valuable part of hand surgical rehabilitation, e.g. in tetraplegia. , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[64]  M. Kornitzer,et al.  The World Health Organization MONICA Project (Monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): A major international Collaboration , 1988 .

[65]  The World Health Organization MONICA Project (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease): a major international collaboration. WHO MONICA Project Principal Investigators. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[66]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[67]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[68]  F. Mahoney,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 2018, Maryland state medical journal.