Predicting the heat transfer through protective clothing under exposure to hot water spray

Abstract Hot liquid splash hazard is a common risk in workplace safety from industrial to home scale, and thermal protective clothing is required to ensure workers' health and safety. In this study, an instrumented manikin test system was used to evaluate the protective performance provided by protective clothing against hot water spray. The effects of fabric properties on the protective performance were investigated, and empirical models were developed to characterize the relationships between fabric properties and thermal protection. The contribution of stored energy to skin burn was also explored. The results indicated that the water repellence finish significantly affected the heat transfer and the protective performance, while the fabric weight and density had slight effect on the protection. The garment with lower air permeability provided better thermal protection. The overall performance increased with the increasing of air gap size for permeable garments. The weft stiffness of the fabric affected the performance as well. The garment with lower stored energy during exposure (EAE) and cooling phase (CAE) provided better thermal protection. The lower the ratio of absorbed energy during exposure to absorbed energy when 2nd degree burn occurred, the higher the stored energy contribution to skin burn injury. Though fabric weight did not show main effect on heat transfer and skin burn injury in permeable garments, it did affect the EAE/BAE. The findings suggest effective design improvement for the protective clothing.

[1]  Elizabeth M. Crown,et al.  Design and Evaluation of Thermal Protective Flightsuits. Part II: Instrumented Mannequin Evaluation , 1998 .

[2]  Guowen Song,et al.  Apparatus for Use in Evaluating Protection from Low Pressure Hot Water Jets , 2012 .

[3]  Guowen Song,et al.  Analysing performance of protective clothing upon hot liquid exposure using instrumented spray manikin. , 2013, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[4]  D. Ahrenholz,et al.  Burn management , 2011, Current opinion in critical care.

[5]  Yehu Lu,et al.  Evaluation of steam and hot liquid splash protection using thermal manikins and simulated tests , 2017 .

[6]  Yehu Lu,et al.  A new protocol to characterize thermal protective performance of fabrics against hot liquid splash , 2013 .

[7]  Steven A Kahn,et al.  Firefighter Burn Injuries: Predictable Patterns Influenced by Turnout Gear , 2012, Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association.

[8]  Mark Ackerman,et al.  Protection From Steam at High Pressures: Development of a Test Device and Protocol , 2008, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[9]  G. Song,et al.  A novel protocol to characterize the thermal protective performance of fabrics in hot-water exposure , 2016 .

[10]  Calvin K. Lee,et al.  Investigation of air gaps entrapped in protective clothing systems , 2002 .

[11]  Sang-shun Lee,et al.  Experiment-based thermal model for permeable clothing systems under hot air jet impingement conditions , 2012 .

[12]  Yehu Lu,et al.  The impact of air gap on thermal performance of protective clothing against hot water spray , 2015 .

[13]  Jun Li,et al.  A novel approach for fit analysis of thermal protective clothing using three-dimensional body scanning. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  Yehu Lu,et al.  Performance study of protective clothing against hot water splashes: from bench scale test to instrumented manikin test. , 2015, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[15]  Tannie Mah,et al.  Investigation of the Contribution of Garment Design to Thermal Protection. Part 2: Instrumented Female Mannequin Flash-fire Evaluation System , 2010 .

[16]  Anne-Virginie Desruelle,et al.  The steam laboratory of the Institut de Médecine Navale du Service de Santé des Armées: a set of tools in the service of the French Navy , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[17]  Udayraj,et al.  Heat and mass transfer through thermal protective clothing – A review , 2016 .

[18]  David A. Torvi,et al.  Influence of Air Gaps On Bench-Top Test Results of Flame Resistant Fabrics , 1999 .