Volterra modeling of the Smooth Pursuit System with application to motor symptoms characterization in Parkinson's disease

A new way of modeling the Smooth Pursuit System (SPS) in humans by means of Volterra series expansion is suggested and utilized together with Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs) to successfully distinguish between healthy controls and Parkinson patients based on their eye movements. To obtain parsimonious Volterra models, orthonormal function expansion of the Volterra kernels in Laguerre functions with the coefficients estimated by SParse Iterative Covariance-based Estimation (SPICE) is used. A combination of these two techniques is shown to greatly reduce the number of model parameters without significant performance loss. In fact, the resulting models outperform the Wiener models of previous research despite the significantly lower number of model parameters. Furthermore, the results of this study indicate that the nonlinearity of the system is likely to be dynamical in nature, rather than static which was previously presumed. The difference between the SPS in healthy controls and Parkinson patients is shown to lie largely in the higher order dynamics of the system. Finally, without the model reduction provided by SPICE, the GMM estimation fails, rendering the model unable to separate healthy controls from Parkinson patients.

[1]  Pawel Kasprowski,et al.  Eye Movements in Biometrics , 2004, ECCV Workshop BioAW.

[2]  Petre Stoica,et al.  SPICE and LIKES: Two hyperparameter-free methods for sparse-parameter estimation , 2012, Signal Process..

[3]  C Kennard,et al.  Ocular motor and manual tracking in Parkinson's disease and the effect of treatment. , 1987, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  Alexander Medvedev,et al.  Mathematical modeling and grey-box identification of the human smooth pursuit mechanism , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications.

[5]  Aude Billard,et al.  Learning Stable Nonlinear Dynamical Systems With Gaussian Mixture Models , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[6]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[7]  Alexander Medvedev,et al.  Visual stimulus design in parameter estimation of the human smooth pursuit system from eye-tracking data , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[8]  Tomi Kinnunen,et al.  Eye-Movements as a Biometric , 2005, SCIA.

[9]  Torbjörn Wigren MATLAB software for recursive identification of Wiener systems : Revision 2 , 2007 .

[10]  V. Marmarelis Identification of nonlinear biological systems using laguerre expansions of kernels , 1993, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Alexander Medvedev,et al.  Dynamic smooth pursuit gain estimation from eye tracking data , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[12]  Alexander Medvedev,et al.  Parametric and non-parametric stochastic anomaly detection in analysis of eye-tracking data , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[13]  N. E. Day Estimating the components of a mixture of normal distributions , 1969 .

[14]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Comparative nonlinear modeling of renal autoregulation in rats: Volterra approach versus artificial neural networks , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[15]  Douglas A. Reynolds,et al.  Speaker Verification Using Adapted Gaussian Mixture Models , 2000, Digit. Signal Process..

[16]  S. Marino,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Pursuit Ocular Movements in Parkinson’s Disease by Using a Video-Based Eye Tracking System , 2007, European Neurology.