Black-box Model Identification of Physical Activity in Type-l Diabetes Patients

In this paper we consider the problem of predicting future values of glucose in type-1 diabetes. In particular, we investigate the benefit of including physical activity, measured by an off-the-shelf wearable device, to other physiologic signals frequently used to predict blood-glucose concentration, namely injected insulin, carbohydrates intake, and past glucose samples measured by a Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) sensor. Derivation of individualized predictors is crucial to cope with the wide inter- and intra-subject variability: learning and updating patient-specific models of the glucose-insulin system and using them to design personalized control actions has the potential to improve substantially patients’ quality oflife. On data collected by 6 subjects for 5 days, we identify a black-box liner model that uses insulin and meal as inputs and glucose as output. Prediction Error Method (PEM) is used for parameter estimation. The personalized model is employed to derive patient-tailored predictors. This procedure is then repeated using a further physiological input, accounting for physical activity. The prediction accuracy of the two models, including or not physical activity, was compared on the basis of two metrics commonly used in system identification, namely Coefficient of Determination (COD) and Root Mean Squared Error. The models identified with physical activity have better performance, increasing the 3-hr prediction COD by mean ± standard deviation of 18.5% ± 30.1%.

[1]  Jaques Reifman,et al.  Update on Mathematical Modeling Research to Support the Development of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[2]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Hypoglycemia Early Alarm Systems Based On Multivariable Models. , 2013, Industrial & engineering chemistry research.

[3]  Konstantina S. Nikita,et al.  Comparative assessment of glucose prediction models for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus applying sensors for glucose and physical activity monitoring , 2015, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[4]  Rolf Johansson,et al.  Glycemic trend prediction using empirical model identification , 2009, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[5]  Simon Fong,et al.  Evaluation of Stream Mining Classifiers for Real-Time Clinical Decision Support System: A Case Study of Blood Glucose Prediction in Diabetes Therapy , 2013, BioMed research international.

[6]  Javier Fernández de Cañete,et al.  Artificial neural networks for closed loop control of in silico and ad hoc type 1 diabetes , 2012, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[7]  C. C. Palerm,et al.  Effect of input excitation on the quality of empirical dynamic models for type 1 diabetes , 2009 .

[8]  Marco Forgione,et al.  Run-to-Run Tuning of Model Predictive Control for Type 1 Diabetes Subjects: In Silico Trial , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[9]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[10]  Josep Vehí,et al.  A review of personalized blood glucose prediction strategies for T1DM patients , 2017, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[11]  R. Hovorka,et al.  Nonlinear model predictive control of glucose concentration in subjects with type 1 diabetes. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[12]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Meal Simulation Model of the Glucose-Insulin System , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.