Believe it or not: Exploring the relationship between dogmatism and openness within non-religious samples

Abstract Personality and dogmatic thinking within religious individuals have been examined by previous research, but neglected for non-religious individuals. In this experiment, we distinguish between two types of non-religious groups; those who ascribe themselves to an identity (atheists) and those who do not (no beliefs in particular). A total of 103 non-religious individuals (36% atheists and 64% with no particular beliefs) completed an online questionnaire measuring dogmatism and openness traits, with an additional Christian group ( n  = 91) serving as a control. After confirming a relationship between identity salience and dogmatism, and validating a measure of dogmatism (DOG) in both non-religious groups, we note key personality differences between the two. Those with no beliefs in particular demonstrated a traditional negative correlation between openness and dogmatism (along with Christians) while these variables correlated positively for atheists (in particular, on ‘unconventionality’). This study is the first to establish differences between the relationship of dogmatism and openness within non-religious populations and explain these differences through group identity. Thus, identity strength and group belief systems are suggested to be key contributors to observed group differences between non-religious individuals.

[1]  Vassilis Saroglou,et al.  Religion and the five factors of personality: a meta-analytic review , 2002 .

[2]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[3]  Jesse M. Smith.  Becoming an Atheist in America: Constructing Identity and Meaning from the Rejection of Theism , 2011 .

[4]  David R. Maines,et al.  Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.John C. Turner , Michael A. Hogg , Penelope J. Oakes , Stephen D. Reicher , Margaret S. Wetherell , 1989 .

[5]  Rupert Brown,et al.  Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization , 1986 .

[6]  R. Putnam,et al.  Secular and Liminal: Discovering Heterogeneity among Religious Nones , 2010 .

[7]  N. Branscombe,et al.  Attitudes toward group-based inequality: social dominance or social identity? , 2003, The British journal of social psychology.

[8]  B. Altemeyer.  Dogmatic Behavior Among Students: Testing a New Measure of Dogmatism , 2002, Journal of Social Psychology.

[9]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  The IPIP–HEXACO scales: An alternative, public-domain measure of the personality constructs in the HEXACO model , 2007 .

[10]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[11]  N. Barber.  A Cross-National Test of the Uncertainty Hypothesis of Religious Belief , 2011 .

[12]  M. Hewstone,et al.  Social Identity Theory's Self-Esteem Hypothesis: A Review and Some Suggestions for Clarification , 1998, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[13]  L. Galen,et al.  Mental well-being in the religious and the non-religious: evidence for a curvilinear relationship , 2011 .

[14]  C. Caldwell-Harris.  Atheism: by-product of cognitive styles of independent learning and systemizing , 2012 .

[15]  P. Zuckerman.  Contrasting irreligious orientation: atheism and secularity in the USA and Scandinavia , 2012 .

[16]  Personality and Social Integration Factors Distinguishing Nonreligious from Religious Groups: The Importance of Controlling for Attendance and Demographics , 2011 .

[17]  H Michael Crowson,et al.  Does the DOG Scale Measure Dogmatism? Another Look at Construct Validity , 2009, The Journal of social psychology.

[18]  Chris G. Sibley,et al.  Prejudice : A Meta-Analysis and Theoretical Review , 2008 .

[19]  Kenneth I. Mavor,et al.  Social identification dimensions as mediators of the effect of prototypicality on intergroup behaviours , 2011 .

[20]  J. Arndt,et al.  Exploring the Existential Function of Religion and Supernatural Agent Beliefs Among Christians, Muslims, Atheists, and Agnostics , 2012, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[21]  M. Rokeach.  Book Reviews: The Open and Closed Mind. Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems , 1961 .

[22]  B. Altemeyer,et al.  RESEARCH: A Revised Religious Fundamentalism Scale: The Short and Sweet of It , 2004 .

[23]  Stuart J. Ritchie,et al.  The relationship between intelligence and multiple domains of religious belief: Evidence from a large adult US sample , 2011 .

[24]  I. Mervielde,et al.  The relationship between Openness to Experience and political ideology , 2000 .

[25]  H. Anisman,et al.  Religiosity as Identity: Toward an Understanding of Religion From a Social Identity Perspective , 2010, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[26]  Buster G. Smith,et al.  The Nones: Social Characteristics of the Religiously Unaffiliated , 2009 .

[27]  O. J. Harvey,et al.  Intergroup Conflict And Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment , 2013 .

[28]  D. Wulff.  Atheists: A Groundbreaking Study of America's Nonbelievers , 2007 .

[29]  N. Akrami,et al.  What matters most to prejudice: Big Five personality, Social Dominance Orientation, or Right‐Wing Authoritarianism? , 2004 .

[30]  S. Bucci,et al.  Right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality: an analysis using the IPIP measure , 2001 .