Globally, tree fecundity exceeds productivity gradients.

Lack of tree fecundity data across climatic gradients precludes the analysis of how seed supply contributes to global variation in forest regeneration and biotic interactions responsible for biodiversity. A global synthesis of raw seedproduction data shows a 250-fold increase in seed abundance from cold-dry to warm-wet climates, driven primarily by a 100-fold increase in seed production for a given tree size. The modest (threefold) increase in forest productivity across the same climate gradient cannot explain the magnitudes of these trends. The increase in seeds per tree can arise from adaptive evolution driven by intense species interactions or from the direct effects of a warm, moist climate on tree fecundity. Either way, the massive differences in seed supply ramify through food webs potentially explaining a disproportionate role for species interactions in the wet tropics.

[1]  Adam R Hanbury-Brown,et al.  Forest regeneration within Earth system models: current process representations and ways forward. , 2022, The New phytologist.

[2]  J. Swenson,et al.  North American tree migration paced by climate in the West, lagging in the East , 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  W. Koenig.  A brief history of masting research , 2021, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[4]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Is there tree senescence? The fecundity evidence , 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  J. Swenson,et al.  Continent-wide tree fecundity driven by indirect climate effects , 2020, Nature Communications.

[6]  M. Gloor,et al.  Global tree-ring analysis reveals rapid decrease in tropical tree longevity with temperature , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  S. Shuster,et al.  Intraspecific Genetic Variation and Species Interactions Contribute to Community Evolution , 2020 .

[8]  E. Gloor,et al.  Forest carbon sink neutralized by pervasive growth-lifespan trade-offs , 2020, Nature Communications.

[9]  D. Greene,et al.  Mast seeding patterns are asynchronous at a continental scale , 2020, Nature Plants.

[10]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Is forest fecundity resistant to drought? Results from an 18‐yr rainfall‐reduction experiment , 2020, The New phytologist.

[11]  A. Hipp,et al.  Biogeography and phylogeny of masting: do global patterns fit functional hypotheses? , 2020, The New phytologist.

[12]  P. Thomas,et al.  Climate warming disrupts mast seeding and its fitness benefits in European beech , 2020, Nature Plants.

[13]  Denis Bastianelli,et al.  TRY plant trait database - enhanced coverage and open access. , 2019, Global change biology.

[14]  James S. Clark,et al.  Foodwebs based on unreliable foundations: spatiotemporal masting merged with consumer movement, storage, and diet , 2019, Ecological Monographs.

[15]  S. Hart,et al.  Fight or Flight? Potential tradeoffs between drought defense and reproduction in conifers. , 2019, Tree physiology.

[16]  J. Brodie,et al.  Seed predation increases from the Arctic to the Equator and from high to low elevations , 2019, Science Advances.

[17]  D. Minor,et al.  Fruit production is influenced by tree size and size‐asymmetric crowding in a wet tropical forest , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[18]  Norman A. Bourg,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of climate on richness drive the latitudinal diversity gradient in forest trees. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[19]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Tropical forests can maintain hyperdiversity because of enemies , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  T. Sanders,et al.  Reproducing reproduction: how to simulate mast seeding in forest models , 2018 .

[21]  S. Wright,et al.  Inter‐annual variability of fruit timing and quantity at Nouragues (French Guiana): insights from hierarchical Bayesian analyses , 2018 .

[22]  J. Abatzoglou,et al.  TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015 , 2018, Scientific Data.

[23]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: A review of progress and priorities , 2018, Global change biology.

[24]  K. Tielbörger,et al.  Decision-making in plants under competition , 2017, Nature Communications.

[25]  M. Hashim,et al.  Unravelling proximate cues of mass flowering in the tropical forests of South‐East Asia from gene expression analyses , 2017, Molecular ecology.

[26]  M. Nicolas,et al.  Increasing spring temperatures favor oak seed production in temperate areas , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[27]  Marvin N. Wright,et al.  SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning , 2017, PloS one.

[28]  P. Hazelton,et al.  Interpreting Soil Test Results: What Do All the Numbers Mean? , 2017 .

[29]  J. Fridley.  Plant energetics and the synthesis of population and ecosystem ecology , 2017 .

[30]  Olaf Conrad,et al.  Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas , 2016, Scientific Data.

[31]  O. Schmitz,et al.  Climate Change, Nutrition, and Bottom-Up and Top-Down Food Web Processes. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  Brian Murphy,et al.  Interpreting Soil Test Results , 2016 .

[33]  A. B. Berdanier,et al.  Divergent reproductive allocation trade‐offs with canopy exposure across tree species in temperate forests , 2016 .

[34]  J. Hunt,et al.  Fecundity selection theory: concepts and evidence , 2015, bioRxiv.

[35]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide , 2015 .

[36]  J. Connell,et al.  Nonrandom, diversifying processes are disproportionately strong in the smallest size classes of a tropical forest , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  James S. Clark,et al.  Competition‐interaction landscapes for the joint response of forests to climate change , 2014, Global change biology.

[38]  D. Westcott,et al.  Loss of frugivore seed dispersal services under climate change , 2014, Nature Communications.

[39]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[40]  E. Assmann,et al.  The Principles of Forest Yield Study: Studies in the Organic Production, Structure, Increment and Yield of Forest Stands , 2013 .

[41]  R. Corlett.  The shifted baseline: Prehistoric defaunation in the tropics and its consequences for biodiversity conservation , 2013 .

[42]  Eliot J. B. McIntire,et al.  Masting in whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis) depletes stored nutrients. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[43]  D. A. King,et al.  Trees approach gravitational limits to height in tall lowland forests of Malaysia , 2009 .

[44]  G. Mittelbach,et al.  Is There a Latitudinal Gradient in the Importance of Biotic Interactions , 2009 .

[45]  A. Pitman,et al.  Is there a latitudinal gradient in seed production , 2009 .

[46]  Dominique Bachelet,et al.  Global potential net primary production predicted from vegetation class, precipitation, and temperature. , 2010, Ecology.

[47]  N. Stephenson,et al.  Forest turnover rates follow global and regional patterns of productivity. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[48]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system , 2005 .

[49]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Tropical forest tree mortality, recruitment and turnover rates: calculation, interpretation and comparison when census intervals vary , 2004 .

[50]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  A Continuous Satellite-Derived Measure of Global Terrestrial Primary Production , 2004 .

[51]  George W. Koch,et al.  The limits to tree height , 2004, Nature.

[52]  James S. Clark,et al.  FECUNDITY OF TREES AND THE COLONIZATION–COMPETITION HYPOTHESIS , 2004 .

[53]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model , 2003 .

[54]  J. Obeso,et al.  The costs of reproduction in plants. , 2002, The New phytologist.

[55]  B. Beckage,et al.  Density-dependent mortality and the latitudinal gradient in species diversity , 2002, Nature.

[56]  Michael J. Oimoen,et al.  The National Elevation Dataset , 2002 .

[57]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[58]  Thomas A. Hennig,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2001, Digital Earth Moving.

[59]  Ostfeld,et al.  Pulsed resources and community dynamics of consumers in terrestrial ecosystems. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[60]  Kyle E. Harms,et al.  Pervasive density-dependent recruitment enhances seedling diversity in a tropical forest , 2000, Nature.

[61]  O. Phillips,et al.  Increasing Turnover Through Time in Tropical Forests , 1994, Science.

[62]  M. Westoby,et al.  Comparative evolutionary ecology of seed size. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[63]  James S. Clark,et al.  Landscape interactions among nitrogen mineralization, species composition, and long-term fire frequency , 1990 .

[64]  James S. Clark,et al.  Integration of ecological levels: individual plant growth, population mortality and ecosystem processes. , 1990 .

[65]  J. Terborgh.  Community aspects of frugivory in tropical forests , 1986 .

[66]  J. Krebs,et al.  Arms races between and within species , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[67]  D. Janzen.  Herbivores and the Number of Tree Species in Tropical Forests , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[68]  J. Tobin.  Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables , 1958 .

[69]  S S I T C H,et al.  Evaluation of Ecosystem Dynamics, Plant Geography and Terrestrial Carbon Cycling in the Lpj Dynamic Global Vegetation Model , 2022 .