Remote detection and diagnosis of thunderstorm turbulence

This paper describes how operational radar, satellite and lightning data may be used in conjunction with numerical weather model data to provide remote detection and diagnosis of atmospheric turbulence in and around thunderstorms. In-cloud turbulence is measured with the NEXRAD Turbulence Detection Algorithm (NTDA) using extensively qualitycontrolled, ground-based Doppler radar data. A real-time demonstration of the NTDA includes generation of a 3-D turbulence mosaic covering the CONUS east of the Rocky Mountains, a web-based display, and experimental uplinks of turbulence maps to en-route commercial aircraft. Near-cloud turbulence is inferred from thunderstorm morphology, intensity, growth rate and environment data provided by (1) satellite radiance measurements, rates of change, winds, and other derived features, (2) lightning strike measurements, (3) radar reflectivity measurements and (4) weather model data. These are combined via a machine learning technique trained using a database of in situ turbulence measurements from commercial aircraft to create a predictive model. This new capability is being developed under FAA and NASA funding to enhance current U.S. and international turbulence decision support systems, allowing rapid-update, highresolution, comprehensive assessments of atmospheric turbulence hazards for use by pilots, dispatchers, and air traffic controllers. It will also contribute to the comprehensive 4-D weather information database for NextGen.

[1]  Kenneth L. Cummins,et al.  J 2 . 5 OVERVIEW OF CAPABILITIES AND PERFORMANCE OF THE U . S . NATIONAL LIGHTNING DETECTION NETWORK , 2005 .

[2]  C. Marzban.  The ROC Curve and the Area under It as Performance Measures , 2004 .

[3]  Larry B. Cornman,et al.  P 4 . 3 AN UPATE ON THE FAA AVIATION WEATHER RESEARCH PROGRAM ’ S IN SITU TURBULENCE MEASUREMENT AND REPORTING SYSTEM , 2004 .

[4]  John K. Williams,et al.  NEXRAD Detection of Hazardous Turbulence , 2006 .

[5]  Robert Sharman,et al.  An Investigation of Turbulence Generation Mechanisms above Deep Convection , 2003 .

[6]  Bruce Carmichael,et al.  VARIED RESEARCH EFFORTS ARE UNDER WAY TO FIND MEANS OF AVOIDING AIR TURBULENCE. , 1993 .

[7]  G. Grell,et al.  Mesoscale Weather Prediction with the RUC Hybrid Isentropic–Terrain-Following Coordinate Model , 2004 .

[8]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[9]  Robert Sharman,et al.  Some Influences of Background Flow Conditions on the Generation of Turbulence due to Gravity Wave Breaking above Deep Convection , 2008 .

[10]  Seth Linden,et al.  Remote detection and real-time alerting for in-cloud turbulence [presentation] , 2008 .

[11]  Cathy Kessinger.  The Radar Echo Classifier for the WSR-88D , 2001 .

[12]  Daniel Megenhardt,et al.  NCWF-2 Probabilistic Forecasts , 2004 .

[13]  Robert Sharman,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Mid- and Upper-Level Turbulence Forecasting , 2006 .

[14]  M. Steiner,et al.  Consolidated storm prediction for aviation (CoSPA) , 2008, 2008 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference.

[15]  Corinne S. Morse,et al.  Real-time estimation of atmospheric turbulence severity from in-situ aircraft measurements , 1995 .

[16]  Allen J. Riordan,et al.  Characterizing the severe turbulence environments associated with commercial aviation accidents. Part 1: A 44-case study synoptic observational analyses , 2005 .

[17]  Barry E. Schwartz,et al.  The Quantitative Use of PIREPs in Developing Aviation Weather Guidance Products , 1996 .