Accurate stress intensity factor solutions for corner cracks at a hole

Abstract Laboratory test and in-service experience shows fatigue cracks at holes exhibit unsymmetric growth; thus, the need for the new solutions is paramount. Stress intensity factor, K, solutions for symmetric and unsymmetric corner cracks at a hole subject to general loading were determined using a hp-version of the finite element method (FEM) in conjunction with a mathematical splitting scheme to enable efficient, accurate calculations. In traditional applications of the FEM, mesh generation is labor intensive; however, using the splitting scheme, stress intensity functions are obtained without explicitly including the crack in the FE mesh of the global structure. By using the hp-version of FEM, a set of K-solutions converging exponentially fast to the exact solution is obtained. The crack is analyzed in the local domain with easily generated FE meshes. All structurally significant crack shapes were considered; specifically, crack depth to crack length ratios (a/c) of 0.1–10.0, crack depth to sheet thickness ratios (a/t) of 0.10–0.99, and hole radius to sheet thickness ratios (r/t)=1.0. The loading conditions were remote tension, remote bending, and pin loading (bearing). In addition, all combinations of a/c and a/t are analyzed at each side of the hole; thus 226,875 solutions were developed with control of the error in the computed K solutions. Calculated relative error is generally much smaller than 1% along the entire crack front including the vertex regions. Comparisons are made to solutions in the open literature. The new K solutions show the literature solutions are, in general, accurate for all three load conditions; however, for the extreme cases of a/c, a/t, and r/t; the literature solutions differ by as much as 26%.

[1]  John G. Bakuckas,et al.  Comparison of boundary correction factor solutions for two symmetric cracks in a straight-shank hole , 2001 .

[2]  J. Newman,et al.  Stress-intensity factor equations for cracks in three-dimensional finite bodies subjected to tension and bending loads , 1984 .

[3]  J. Rice,et al.  Elementary engineering fracture mechanics , 1974 .

[4]  R. Shah,et al.  Stress Intensity Factors for Through and Part-Through Cracks Originating at Fastener Holes , 1976 .

[5]  Joseph M. Bloom,et al.  Determination of stress intensity factors for the corner cracked hole using the isoparametric singularity element , 1977 .

[6]  Ivo Babuška,et al.  Reliable stress and fracture mechanics analysis of complex components using a h–p version of FEM , 1995 .

[7]  T. E. Kullgren,et al.  Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Surface Cracks Emanating from Fastener Holes , 1977 .

[8]  S. A. Fawaz Fatigue Crack Growth in Riveted Joints , 1997 .

[9]  James C. Newman,et al.  Stress-intensity factors for two symmetric corner cracks , 1979 .

[10]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  An alternating method for analysis of surface-flawed aircraft structural components , 1983 .

[11]  W. J. Gordon,et al.  Transfinite element methods: Blending-function interpolation over arbitrary curved element domains , 1973 .

[12]  P. Paris A rational analytic theory of fatigue , 1961 .

[13]  Satya N. Atluri,et al.  Computational Schemes for Integrity Analyses of Fuselage Panels in Aging Airplanes , 1991 .

[14]  James A. Harter,et al.  AFGROW Users Guide and Technical Manual , 1999 .

[15]  James C. Newman,et al.  Evaluation of finite-element models and stress-intensity factors for surface cracks emanating from stress concentrations , 1990 .

[16]  A. Blom,et al.  On the Semi-Elliptical Surface Crack Problem: Detailed Numerical Solutions for Complete Elastic Stress Fields , 1990 .