Exploration of Users’ Cross-Cultural Differences by Using the Kansei Engineering Approach

Nowadays, product design for the global market has to meet the needs and demands of more than a single group of users. Besides the required functionality, the emotional value of the product also plays an important role in user satisfaction. One of the aspects that an interdisciplinary design team should consider while developing a new product is the users’ cross-cultural differences in emotional responses toward product elements. The objective of this study was to use the adjusted Kansei engineering methodology, named the Kansei cross-culture (KCUL) model, in order to discover the differences or similarities in emotional responses toward shapes and colors of diverse groups of participants. This study demonstrates this methodology on two groups of students, one from Central Europe and the other from South Asia (India). We presumed that the observed participants will have different associations toward certain shape and color samples, as well as that they will differ in the intensity of responses. The data were collected through Semantic differential questionnaires and the five-level Likert scale. The survey results were then analyzed using the Factor analysis, the Independent t-test, and the Linear mixed models.

[1]  Yang-Kun Ou,et al.  Effects of sign design features and training on comprehension of traffic signs in Taiwanese and Vietnamese user groups , 2012 .

[2]  L. V. D. Berg-Weitzel,et al.  Relation between culture and communication in packaging design , 2001 .

[3]  Vesna Popovic,et al.  Product Analysis Based on Botswana's Postcolonial Socio-cultural Perspective , 2007 .

[4]  P. Ekman,et al.  American-Japanese cultural differences in intensity ratings of facial expressions of emotion , 1989 .

[5]  P. Ekman,et al.  Coherence between expressive and experiential systems in emotion , 1994 .

[6]  G. Hofstede Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[7]  Halimahtun M. Khalid,et al.  A framework for affective customer needs in product design , 2004 .

[8]  P. Desmet,et al.  The Basis of Product Emotions , 2002 .

[9]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Cultural differences in the online behavior of consumers , 2002, CACM.

[10]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Special issue editorial: Design and emotion , 2009 .

[11]  Katharina Reinecke,et al.  Improving performance, perceived usability, and aesthetics with culturally adaptive user interfaces , 2011, TCHI.

[12]  Fenggang Yang,et al.  Transformations in New Immigrant Religions and Their Global Implications , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[13]  Mubeen Aslam,et al.  Are You Selling the Right Colour? A Cross‐cultural Review of Colour as a Marketing Cue , 2006 .

[14]  Albert N. Badre,et al.  The Effects of Cross Cultural Interface Design Orientation on World Wide Web User Performance , 2001 .

[15]  Rung-Tai Lin,et al.  Transforming Taiwan Aboriginal Cultural Features into Modern Product Design: A Case Study of a Cross-cultural Product Design Model , 2007 .

[16]  Lydia J. Price,et al.  The Impact of Self-Construal on Aesthetic Preference for Angular Versus Rounded Shapes , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[17]  R. Nisbett The geography of thought : how Asians and Westerners think differently--and why , 2003 .

[18]  Jan P.L. Schoormans,et al.  How consumers perceive product appearance: The identification of three product appearance attributes , 2009 .

[19]  I. McManus,et al.  The Aesthetics of Colour , 1981, Perception.

[20]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[21]  Peter H. Bloch Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response: , 1995 .

[22]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[23]  Tom Peters,et al.  Marketing Aesthetics: The Strategic Management of Brands, Identity and Image , 1997 .

[24]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  The Aesthetic Dimensions of U.S. and South Korean Responses to Web Home Pages: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  P. Clarkson,et al.  Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design , 2004 .

[26]  Shang H. Hsu,et al.  A semantic differential study of designers’ and users’ product form perception , 2000 .

[27]  Richard D. Alexander,et al.  Darwinism and human affairs , 1979 .

[28]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Emotion & design: attractive things work better , 2002, INTR.

[29]  Randi Priluck Grossman,et al.  What we know about consumers’ color choices , 1999 .

[30]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[31]  Hazel Clark,et al.  Culture-Based Knowledge Towards New Design Thinking and PracticeA Dialogue , 2003, Design Issues.