Normal values for myocardial deformation within the right heart measured by feature-tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging☆

Background Reproducible and repeatable assessment of right heart function is vital for monitoring congenital and acquired heart disease. There is increasing evidence for the additional value of myocardial deformation (strain and strain rate) in determining prognosis. This study aims to determine the reproducibility of deformation analyses in the right heart using cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking (FT-CMR); and to establish normal ranges within an adult population. Methods A cohort of 100 healthy subjects containing 10 males and 10 females from each decade of life between the ages of 20 and 70 without known congenital or acquired cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia or renal, hepatic, haematologic and systemic inflammatory disorders underwent FT-CMR assessment of right ventricular (RV) and right atrial (RA) myocardial strain and strain rate. Results RV longitudinal strain (Ell) was − 21.9 ± 3.24% (FW + S Ell) and − 24.2 ± 3.59% (FW-Ell). Peak systolic strain rate (S′) was − 1.45 ± 0.39 s− 1 (FW + S) and − 1.54 ± 0.41 s− 1 (FW). Early diastolic strain rate (E′) was 1.04 ± 0.26 s− 1 (FW + S) and 1.04 ± 0.33 s− 1 (FW). Late diastolic strain rate (A′) was 0.94 ± 0.33 s− 1 (FW + S) and 1.08 ± 0.33 s− 1 (FW). RA peak strain was − 21.1 ± 3.76%. The intra- and inter-observer ICC for RV Ell (FW + S) was 0.92 and 0.80 respectively, while for RA peak strain was 0.92 and 0.89 respectively. Conclusions Normal values of RV & RA deformation for healthy individuals using FT-CMR are provided with good RV Ell and RA peak strain reproducibility. Strain rate suffered from sub-optimal reproducibility and may not be satisfactory for clinical use.

[1]  L. Badano,et al.  Sex- and Method-Specific Reference Values for Right Ventricular Strain by 2-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[2]  Walter Heindel,et al.  Biventricular myocardial strain analysis in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) using cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking , 2014, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[3]  Wojciech Mazur,et al.  Myocardial strain measurement with feature-tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance: normal values. , 2015, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[4]  G. Pedrizzetti,et al.  Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. , 2015, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[5]  Oskar M. Skrinjar,et al.  Myocardial deformation recovery from cine MRI using a nearly incompressible biventricular model , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  K. Gauvreau,et al.  Relation of biventricular strain and dyssynchrony in repaired tetralogy of fallot measured by cardiac magnetic resonance to death and sustained ventricular tachycardia. , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  L. Badano,et al.  Reference values of right ventricular longitudinal strain by speckle tracking echocardiography in 219 healthy volunteers , 2013 .

[8]  E. Nagel,et al.  Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[9]  Jan D’hooge,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking using a non-rigid, elastic image registration algorithm: assessment of variability in a real-life clinical setting , 2017, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[10]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Predicting cardiovascular risk in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QRISK2 , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  M. Gutberlet,et al.  Myocardial deformation parameters predict outcome in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot , 2015, Heart.

[12]  Robert Fleck,et al.  Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for strain calculation with harmonic phase imaging analysis. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[13]  Dudley J Pennell,et al.  Reference right ventricular systolic and diastolic function normalized to age, gender and body surface area from steady-state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. , 2006, European heart journal.

[14]  R. Steeds,et al.  Reference ranges and reproducibility studies for right heart myocardial deformation by feature tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging☆ , 2017, Data in brief.

[15]  P. Pellikka,et al.  Outcome Prediction by Quantitative Right Ventricular Function Assessment in 575 Subjects Evaluated for Pulmonary Hypertension , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[16]  T. Geva,et al.  Interstudy variability in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measurements of ventricular volume, mass, and ejection fraction in repaired tetralogy of fallot: A prospective observational study , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Stefan K. Piechnik,et al.  Reference ranges for cardiac structure and function using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in Caucasians from the UK Biobank population cohort , 2017, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[18]  P. Jüni,et al.  Predictors of functional decline in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). , 2013, European heart journal.

[19]  S. Raman,et al.  Cardiac magnetic resonance tissue tracking in right ventricle: Feasibility and normal values. , 2017, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[20]  M. Galderisi,et al.  The impact of ageing on right ventricular longitudinal function in healthy subjects: a pulsed tissue Doppler study. , 2007, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.