Identifying Key Parameters for Design Improvement in High-Dimensional Systems With Uncertainty

Key parameters may be used to turn a bad design into a good design with comparatively little effort. The proposed method identifies key parameters in high-dimensional nonlinear systems that are subject to uncertainty. A numerical optimization algorithm seeks a solution space on which all designs are good, that is, they satisfy a specified design criterion. The solution space is box-shaped and provides target intervals for each parameter. A bad design may be turned into a good design by moving its key parameters into their target intervals. The solution space is computed so as to minimize the effort for design work: its shape is controlled by particular constraints such that it can be reached by changing only a small number of key parameters. Wide target intervals provide tolerance against uncertainty, which is naturally present in a design process, when design parameters are unknown or cannot be controlled exactly. In a simple two-dimensional example problem, the accuracy of the algorithm is demonstrated. In a high-dimensional vehicle crash design problem, an underperforming vehicle front structure is improved by identifying and appropriately changing a relevant key parameter.

[1]  Joshua I. Bernstein,et al.  Design methods in the aerospace industry : looking for evidence of set-based practices , 1998 .

[2]  David J. Singer,et al.  Adapting to Changes in Design Requirements Using Set-Based Design , 2011 .

[3]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[4]  Markus Zimmermann,et al.  On the calibration of simplified vehicle crash models , 2014 .

[5]  Allen Corlies Ward,et al.  A theory of quantitative inference for artifact sets, applied to a mechanical design compiler , 1988 .

[6]  Allen C. Ward,et al.  A Theory of Quantitative Inference, Applied to a Mechanical Design Compiler , 1989 .

[7]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Modeling Design Concepts under Risk and Uncertainty using Parameterized Efficient Sets , 2008 .

[8]  S. Wagner,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis of Predictor Models in Software Engineering , 2007, Third International Workshop on Predictor Models in Software Engineering (PROMISE'07: ICSE Workshops 2007).

[9]  Markus Zimmermann,et al.  Computing solution spaces for robust design , 2013 .

[10]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Markus Zimmermann,et al.  An inexpensive estimate of failure probability for high-dimensional systems with uncertainty , 2012 .

[12]  Markus Zimmermann Vehicle Front Crash Design Accounting for Uncertainties , 2013 .

[13]  David J. Singer,et al.  What Is Set-Based Design? , 2009 .

[14]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  An Interval-Based Focalization Method for Decision-Making in Decentralized, Multi-Functional Design , 2005, DAC 2005.

[15]  Bernhard Sendhoff,et al.  Robust Optimization - A Comprehensive Survey , 2007 .