Hyperemia reduction after administration of a fixed combination of bimatoprost and timolol maleate to patients on prostaglandin or prostamide monotherapy.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in hyperemia and intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients who switch from prostaglandin or prostamide to a fixed combination of prostamide and timolol maleate. DESIGN A multicenter, longitudinal, noncontrolled, nonrandomized open trial was conducted. PARTICIPANTS One hundred forty-four patients (282 eyes) were selected: 60 (41.6%) were on travaprost, 51 (35.4%) on bimatoprost, and 33 (22.9%) on latanoprost. All patients included were unable to attain adequate IOP control with monotherapy and had no contraindications to β-blockers. INTERVENTION Patients were treated with a fixed combination of bimatoprost and timolol maleate. Hyperemia was evaluated using a referential table, and IOP was measured at 8:00, 12:00, and 16:00 h both before and after 4 months of treatment. MAIN OUTCOME IOP and hyperemia were compared at 2 time points: pretreatment and after 4 months. The mean of the 3 IOP measurements taken at various points during the day was considered for analysis. Generalized estimating equations were used for repeated measures and intereye dependency adjustments. RESULTS Hyperemia and IOP were reduced in all 3 groups, with the same pattern for both eyes. The bimatoprost group had the highest levels of hyperemia before treatment when compared with the latanoprost as well as the travaprost group and had the greatest reduction in hyperemia after treatment (P < 0.01). Regarding IOP, all 3 groups had a significant reduction (P < 0.001), but the bimatoprost group had a lower pretreatment IOP when compared with the travaprost and latanoprost groups. CONCLUSION A significant reduction in hyperemia was found after switching from monotherapy with prostaglandins or prostamide to a fixed combination of prostamide and a β-blocker. IOP reduction was significant after the intervention in all 3 groups.

[1]  T. Vajaranant,et al.  Bimatoprost – a review , 2009, Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy.

[2]  J. Nachega,et al.  Efficacy and safety of prostaglandin analogues in patients with predominantly primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a meta-analysis , 2009, Clinical ophthalmology.

[3]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Incidence of Hyperemia Associated with Bimatoprost Treatment in Naïve Subjects and in Subjects Previously Treated with Latanoprost , 2009, European journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  S. Kotak,et al.  Hyperemia-associated costs of medication changes in glaucoma patients treated initially with prostaglandin analogs. , 2009, Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

[5]  S. Hahn,et al.  The impact of ocular adverse effects in patients treated with topical prostaglandin analogs: changes in prescription patterns and patient persistence. , 2009, Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

[6]  J. Soto-Álvarez,et al.  DESARROLLO DE HIPEREMIA CONJUNTIVAL TRAS EL EMPLEO DE LA COMBINACIÓN FIJA DE LATANOPROST/TIMOLOL: REVISIÓN SISTEMÁTICA Y METAANÁLISIS DE ENSAYOS CLÍNICOS PUBLICADOS CONJUNTIVAL HYPEREMIA WITH THE USE OF A FIXED COMBINATION OF LATANOPROST/TIMOLOL: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF CLINICAL TRIAL , 2009 .

[7]  A. Martínez,et al.  Bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination vs latanoprost/timolol fixed combination in open-angle glaucoma patients , 2009, Eye.

[8]  M. Cucherat,et al.  Efficacy and Tolerability of Prostaglandin Analogs: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials , 2008, Journal of glaucoma.

[9]  V. Polo,et al.  Conjunctival hyperaemia with the use of latanoprost versus other prostaglandin analogues in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[10]  A. Alm,et al.  Side effects associated with prostaglandin analog therapy. , 2008, Survey of ophthalmology.

[11]  B. Kruft,et al.  Physician Attitudes regarding Prostaglandin Treatment for Glaucoma in the United States and Europe , 2007, European journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  J. Brandt,et al.  Bimatoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination: A 3-month Double-masked, Randomized Parallel Comparison to Its Individual Components in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension , 2007, Journal of glaucoma.

[13]  R. Saxena,et al.  Prospective comparative switch study from timolol 0.5% and latanoprost 0.005% to bimatoprost 0.03% , 2006, Advances in therapy.

[14]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Conjunctival hyperemia associated with bimatoprost use: a histopathologic study. , 2004, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  Robert S. Noecker,et al.  Comparison of latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 12-week, randomized, masked-evaluator multicenter study. , 2004, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  N. Osborne,et al.  β-Adrenergic receptor agonists and antagonists counteract LPS-induced neuronal death in retinal cultures by different mechanisms , 2003, Brain Research.

[17]  L. Devgan,et al.  Visually Significant Cystoid Macular Edema in Pseudophakic and Aphakic Patients With Glaucoma Receiving Latanoprost , 2000, Journal of glaucoma.