The Student Conference: A Model of Authentic Assessment

In the global marketplace, the ability to communicate, both orally and in writing, is a skillset demanded by employers. Unfortunately, typical academic exercises that involve written and oral communication are often just that â?¦ academic exercises. To provide a more authentic and robust experience, a student conference activity has been developed for use in a second-level physics course entitled Physics for a New Millennium (PNM) at American University (AU). This activity involves writing a formal research paper using professional guidelines. In addition, students present their research paper during a class event modeled after an actual professional conference. A focus of this paper is to discuss the assessment strategies developed for the conference paper activity. A major goal of the assessment strategies designed for the conference paper and the associated presentation is to better capture (and then assess) what students are actually learning in the course. This paper will provide an overview of the student conference paper activity with emphasis on its value as an alternative assessment tool. To that end, a synopsis of how the conference paper activity has been designed will be shared. This synopsis will begin with a general discussion of assessment, assessment methods, and the â??language of assessment.â? Following this synopsis a model of non-traditional assessment using the student conference paper will be highlighted. Subsequently a description of the course curriculum and the specific structure for the writing activity will be outlined as they relate to the learning outcomes for the course. Shadowing the presentation of the course-specific learning outcomes, a description of the strategies used to uncover student learning will be shared. These strategies provide an opportunity for multiple assessment â??snapshotsâ? to be made throughout various phases of the learning process. To illustrate these snapshots, examples from actual student work will be presented and discussed. The assessment strategies developed for the student conference paper can be used as an alternative, or as a supplement, to more traditional pencil and paper examinations, quizzes, and homework assignments. Whether used as a stand-alone assessment tool or coupled with more traditional measures, the model presented here can provide an enhanced and more authentic way to capture what students are actually learning while the learning is taking place.

[1]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[2]  Teresa L. Larkin THE INCLUSIVE CLASSROOM: A RESEARCH-BASED APPROACH TO ENHANCE LEARNING , 2013 .

[3]  Woodrow Wilson,et al.  Walvoord, B. E. (2010). Assessment clear and simple: A practical guide for institutions, departments, and general education (2 nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. , 2010 .

[4]  David Richardson,et al.  Assessing Student Performance , 2009 .

[5]  Marc P. Johnston Assessment for Excellence: The Philosophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education (2nd ed.) by Alexander W. Astin and Anthony Lising Antonio (review) , 2014 .

[6]  Priscilla W. Laws,et al.  Calculus‐Based Physics Without Lectures , 1991 .

[7]  Frederick Reif,et al.  Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes , 1995 .

[8]  David Hammer,et al.  More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research , 1996 .

[9]  David Hammer,et al.  Two approaches to learning physics , 1989 .

[10]  Calvin S. Kalman,et al.  Successful Science and Engineering Teaching in Colleges and Universities , 2006 .

[11]  L. McDermott Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics , 1984 .

[12]  Frederick Reif,et al.  Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes , 1995 .

[13]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual , 1999 .

[14]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Curvilinear motion in the absence of external forces: naive beliefs about the motion of objects. , 1980, Science.

[15]  Edward F. Redish,et al.  Teaching Physics: Figuring out What Works , 1999 .

[16]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Evaluating innovation in studio physics , 1999 .

[17]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions , 2009, Science.

[18]  Teresa L. Larkin The Evolution of Assessment within an Introductory Physics Course , 2013, Int. J. Eng. Pedagog..

[19]  R. Hake Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[20]  A. V. Heuvelen,et al.  Learning to think like a physicist: A review of research‐based instructional strategies , 1991 .

[21]  Arnold B. Arons,et al.  A Guide to Introductory Physics Teaching , 1990 .

[22]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[23]  Louis Deslauriers,et al.  Improved Learning in a Large-Enrollment Physics Class , 2011, Science.

[24]  F. Reif,et al.  Teaching scientific thinking skills: Students and computers coaching each other , 1999 .

[25]  Teresa Larkin Peer Review From A Student Perspective , 2009 .

[26]  B. Walvoord,et al.  Assessment clear and simple: a practical guide for institutions, departments, and general education / Barbara E. Walvoord , 2010 .

[27]  Alan Van Heuvelen,et al.  Overview, Case Study Physics , 1991 .

[28]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Introduction to SCALE-UP: Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment University Physics. , 2000 .

[29]  T. Larkin-Hein Writing as a Teaching and Learning Tool in SMET Education , 2001 .

[30]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .

[31]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Learning motion concepts using real‐time microcomputer‐based laboratory tools , 1990 .

[32]  Teresa L. Larkin Give it a “TWIST!”: Turning writing into student thinking , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[33]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Toward a scientific practice of science education , 2013 .

[34]  Rocco Paolucci,et al.  The learning effectiveness of eductional technology: a call for further research , 1998 .