Challenging the problem of clostridial identification with matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS).

Diverse techniques were applied to effect the identification and classification of isolated clostridial strains. Nevertheless, the correct identification of clostridial strains remains a laborious, time-consuming task which entails a not inconsiderable degree of expertise. In addition to this, traditional methods based on the metabolic properties of the bacteria require rigorously standardized media and growth conditions to assure the attainment of reproducible results. Although DNA-based methods, like the PCR of a species specific gene, are known to yield precise and reproducible results, their degree of effectivity is circumscribed by the fact that even the incidence of a toxin encoding gene is not necessarily linked to nor consequently indicative of the presence of an infectious disease. Moreover, most of these methods postulate an initial assumption concerning the expected bacterial species involved before the choice of PCR primer for use can be made. Consequently, the scope of these methods is restricted to that of targeted analyses. The 16S rDNA sequencing which is assumed to be the gold standard for bacterial classification having the unequivocal advantage of being capable of determining even uncultivable bacteria is nonetheless a time-consuming and costly technique. In the present study we describe the utilization of matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for whole cell fingerprinting in combination with a dedicated bioinformatic software tool to distinguish between various clostridial species. Total 64 clostridial strains of 31 different species each displayed a mass spectrum unique to the strain involved, to the effect that it was also possible not only to differentiate between the strains examined, but also to establish to which species the individual strains belonged to. Starting with a single colony it was possible to correctly identify a Clostridium species within minutes. It was even possible to identify species which are normally difficult to differentiate by traditional methods, such as C. chauvoei and C. septicum. With the results obtained we were able to assemble a dendrogram of the Clostridium species which showed considerable similarities to dendrograms based upon 16S rDNA sequencing data. To conclude, our findings indicate that, inasmuch as the MALDI-TOF MS technology employed is based on a high-quality reference database, it may serve as an effective tool for the swift and reliable identification and classification of Clostridia.

[1]  E. Stackebrandt,et al.  Taxonomy and systematics. , 2005 .

[2]  P. Dürre From Pandora's Box to Cornucopia: Clostridia – A Historical Perspective , 2005 .

[3]  W. Moore,et al.  Clostridium perenne and Clostridium paraperfringens: Later Subjective Synonyms of Clostridium barati , 1982 .

[4]  C. Hatheway,et al.  Toxigenic clostridia , 1990, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[5]  K. Takeshi,et al.  Simple Method for Detection of Clostridium botulinum Type A to F Neurotoxin Genes by Ploymerase Chain Reaction , 1996, Microbiology and immunology.

[6]  S. Nakamura,et al.  Taxonomic relationships among Clostridium novyi Types A and B, Clostridium haemolyticum and Clostridium botulinum type C. , 1983, Journal of general microbiology.

[7]  L. O. Ticknor,et al.  Genetic Diversity among Botulinum Neurotoxin-Producing Clostridial Strains , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  M. Collins,et al.  Genetic interrelationships of saccharolytic Clostridium botulinum types B, E and F and related clostridia as revealed by small-subunit rRNA gene sequences. , 1993, FEMS microbiology letters.

[9]  Erko Stackebrandt,et al.  Taxonomic Note: A Place for DNA-DNA Reassociation and 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis in the Present Species Definition in Bacteriology , 1994 .

[10]  Lillian V. Holdeman,et al.  Anaerobe Laboratory manual , 1977 .

[11]  Hubert Bahl,et al.  Clostridia-Biotechnology and Medical Applications , 2001 .

[12]  C. Fenselau,et al.  Characterization of the protein subset desorbed by MALDI from whole bacterial cells. , 2001, Analytical Chemistry.

[13]  H. Korkeala,et al.  Efficient DNA Fingerprinting of Clostridium botulinum Types A, B, E, and F by Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  East,et al.  Phylogeny and taxonomy of the food‐borne pathogen Clostridium botulinum and its neurotoxins , 1998, Journal of applied microbiology.

[15]  E. Stackebrandt,et al.  Phylogenetic basis for a taxonomic dissection of the genus Clostridium. , 1999, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[16]  G. Gottschalk,et al.  Clostridium tetanomorphum sp. nov., nom. rev. , 1989 .

[17]  A. Mellmann,et al.  Evaluation of Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry in Comparison to 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing for Species Identification of Nonfermenting Bacteria , 2008, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[18]  A. Rodloff,et al.  Resistance to Moxifloxacin in ToxigenicClostridium difficile Isolates Is Associated with Mutations in gyrA , 2001, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.