Connectomics in NeuroImaging: Third International Workshop, CNI 2019, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2019, Shenzhen, China, October 13, 2019, Proceedings

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is known as a progressive neurodegenerative disease in elderly people. Apart from decelerating the disease exacerbation, early and accurate diagnosis also alleviates mental and physical sufferings and provides timely and appropriate medication. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised feature selection method via adaptive manifold embedding and sparse learning exploiting longitudinal multimodal neuroimaging data for classification and regression prediction. Specifically, the proposed method simultaneously carries out feature selection and dynamic local structure learning to obtain the structural information inherent in the neuroimaging data. We conduct extensive experiments on the publicly available Parkinson’s progression markers initiative (PPMI) dataset to validate the proposed method. Our proposed method outperforms other state-of-the-art methods in terms of classification and regression prediction performance.

[1]  Dan Boneh,et al.  On genetic algorithms , 1995, COLT '95.

[2]  Jean Cousty,et al.  Some Morphological Operators in Graph Spaces , 2009, ISMM.

[3]  B. Biswal,et al.  The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Erlend Hodneland,et al.  Cortico-striatal connectivity and cognition in normal aging: A combined DTI and resting state fMRI study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[5]  John D. Storey A direct approach to false discovery rates , 2002 .

[6]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Combining multiple connectomes improves predictive modeling of phenotypic measures , 2019, NeuroImage.

[7]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  fMRI at 20: Has it changed the world? , 2012, NeuroImage.

[8]  Huafu Chen,et al.  Multivariate classification of social anxiety disorder using whole brain functional connectivity , 2013, Brain Structure and Function.

[9]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Unified Framework for Development, Deployment and Robust Testing of Neuroimaging Algorithms , 2011, Neuroinformatics.

[10]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[11]  F. Deligianni,et al.  Relating resting-state fMRI and EEG whole-brain connectomes across frequency bands , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[12]  Mark A. Elliott,et al.  The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: A publicly available resource for the study of normal and abnormal brain development in youth , 2016, NeuroImage.

[13]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  Xi-Nian Zuo,et al.  REST: A Toolkit for Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Processing , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Islem Rekik,et al.  Brain multiplexes reveal morphological connectional biomarkers fingerprinting late brain dementia states , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[17]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[18]  Ahmad R. Hariri,et al.  General functional connectivity: Shared features of resting-state and task fMRI drive reliable and heritable individual differences in functional brain networks , 2018, NeuroImage.

[19]  M. Abramowitz,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series No. 55) , 1965 .

[20]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Resting-state fMRI in the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[21]  I. Rekik,et al.  Gender differences in cortical morphological networks , 2019, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[22]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Graph morphology , 1992, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[23]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[24]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Which fMRI clustering gives good brain parcellations? , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[25]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  THE HUMAN CONNECTOME: A COMPLEX NETWORK , 2011, Schizophrenia Research.

[26]  Xenophon Papademetris,et al.  Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI data for network node identification , 2013, NeuroImage.

[27]  Islem Rekik,et al.  Clustering-based multi-view network fusion for estimating brain network atlases of healthy and disordered populations , 2019, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[28]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Task-induced brain state manipulation improves prediction of individual traits , 2018, Nature Communications.

[29]  T. Wong,et al.  Alterations in Brain Network Topology and Structural-Functional Connectome Coupling Relate to Cognitive Impairment , 2018, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[30]  H. Hotelling A Generalized T Test and Measure of Multivariate Dispersion , 1951 .

[31]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Network-based statistic: Identifying differences in brain networks , 2010, NeuroImage.

[32]  Pascal Frossard,et al.  The emerging field of signal processing on graphs: Extending high-dimensional data analysis to networks and other irregular domains , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[33]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Brain graphs: graphical models of the human brain connectome. , 2011, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[34]  K. Amunts,et al.  Centenary of Brodmann's Map — Conception and Fate , 2022 .