Biomass equations for forest regrowth in the eastern Amazon using randomized branch sampling

Forest regrowth occupies an extensive and increasing area in the Amazon basin, but accurate assessment of the impact of regrowth on carbon and nutrient cycles has been hampered by a paucity of available allometric equations. We develop pooled and species-specific equations for total aboveground biomass for a study site in the eastern Amazon that had been abandoned for 15 years. Field work was conducted using randomized branch sampling, a rapid technique that has seen little use in tropical forests. High consistency of sample paths in randomized branch sampling, as measured by the standard error of individual paths (14%), suggests the method may provide substantial efficiencies when compared to traditional procedures. The best fitting equations in this study used the traditional form Y=a×DBH b , where Y is biomass, DBH is diameter at breast height, and a and b are both species-specific parameters. Species-specific equations of the form Y=a(BA×H), where Y is biomass, BA is tree basal area, H is tree height, and a is a species-specific parameter, fit almost as well. Comparison with previously published equations indicated errors from -33% to +29% would have occurred using off-site relationships. We also present equations for stemwood, twigs, and foliage as biomass components.

[1]  J. Saldarriaga,et al.  LONG-TERM CHRONOSEQUENCE OF FOREST SUCCESSION IN THE UPPER RIO NEGRO OF COLOMBIA AND VENEZUELA , 1988 .

[2]  Bertil Matérn.  On the geometry of the cross-section of a stem , 1956 .

[3]  B. Nelson,et al.  Allometric regressions for improved estimate of secondary forest biomass in the central Amazon , 1999 .

[4]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[5]  J. R. N. F. Gama,et al.  Mapeamento dos solos da estação de piscicultura de Castanhal, PA. , 1999 .

[6]  N. Sugiura.  Further analysts of the data by akaike' s information criterion and the finite corrections , 1978 .

[7]  Ariel E. Lugo,et al.  Biomass Estimation Methods for Tropical Forests with Applications to Forest Inventory Data , 1989, Forest Science.

[8]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[9]  P. Fearnside,et al.  Carbon uptake by secondary forests in Brazilian Amazonia , 1996 .

[10]  K. Ickes,et al.  Alternative successional pathways in the Amazon Basin , 2001 .

[11]  M. Steininger.  NET CARBON FLUXES FROM FOREST CLEARANCE AND REGROWTH IN THE AMAZON , 2004 .

[12]  T. O. Kvålseth.  Cautionary Note about R 2 , 1985 .

[13]  Manfred Denich,et al.  Floristic inventory of secondary vegetation in agricultural systems of East-Amazonia , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[14]  Timothy G. Gregoire,et al.  Sampling Methods to Estimate Foliage and Other Characteristics of Individual Trees , 1995 .

[15]  R. Houghton,et al.  Annual fluxes of carbon from deforestation and regrowth in the Brazilian Amazon , 2000, Nature.

[16]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Wood density in dense forest in central Amazonia, Brazil , 2005 .

[17]  C. Uhl,et al.  Abandoned pastures in eastern Amazonia. I. Patterns of plant succession , 1988 .

[18]  R. J. Jessen,et al.  Determining the Fruit Count on a Tree by Randomized Branch Sampling , 1955 .

[19]  Christopher Uhl,et al.  Abandoned pastures in eastern Amazonia. II. Nutrient stocks in the soil and vegetation , 1988 .

[20]  Philip M. Fearnside,et al.  Amazonian deforestation and global warming: carbon stocks in vegetation replacing Brazil's Amazon forest , 1996 .