How should we define fitness in structured metapopulation models? Including an application to the calculation of evolutionarily stable dispersal strategies

We define a fitness concept applicable to structured metapopulations consisting of infinitely many equally coupled patches. In addition, we introduce a more easily calculated quantity Rm that relates to fitness in the same manner as R0 relates to fitness in ordinary population dynamics: the Rm of a mutant is only defined when the resident population dynamics converges to a point equilibrium and Rm is larger (smaller) than 1 if and only if mutant fitness is positive (negative). Rm corresponds to the average number of newborn dispersers resulting from the (on average less than one) local colony founded by a newborn disperser. Efficient algorithms for calculating its numerical value are provided. As an example of the usefulness of these concepts we calculate the evolutionarily stable conditional dispersal strategy for individuals that can account for the local population density in their dispersal decisions. Below a threshold density ã, at which staying and leaving are equality profitable, everybody should stay and above ã everybody should leave, where profitability is measured as the mean number of dispersers produced through lines of descent consisting of only non–dispersers.

[1]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal , 1983 .

[2]  A. M. de Roos,et al.  Towards a numerical analysis of the Escalator Boxcar Train , 1991 .

[3]  O. Diekmann,et al.  Studying the Dynamics of Structured Population Models: A Versatile Technique and Its Application to Daphnia , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[4]  J. Metz,et al.  Adaptive Dynamics: A Geometrical Study of the Consequences of Nearly Faithful Reproduction , 1995 .

[5]  K. Parvinen Evolution of migration in a metapopulation , 1999, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[6]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Structured Metapopulation Models , 1997 .

[7]  O. Diekmann,et al.  The Dynamics of Physiologically Structured Populations , 1986 .

[8]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  EVOLUTION OF DISPERSAL RATES IN METAPOPULATION MODELS: BRANCHING AND CYCLIC DYNAMICS IN PHENOTYPE SPACE , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  R. Nisbet,et al.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Mark A. McPeek,et al.  Chaotic Population Dynamics Favors the Evolution of Dispersal , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[11]  I. Olivieri,et al.  Evolutionarily Stable Dispersal Rates Do Not Always Increase with Local Extinction Rates , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Jülich Evolutionary Cycling in Predator – Prey Interactions : Population Dynamics and the Red Queen , 1994 .

[13]  Odo Diekmann,et al.  On the formulation and analysis of general deterministic structured population models I. Linear Theory , 1998, Journal of mathematical biology.

[14]  P. Gouyon,et al.  Evolution of Migration Rate and Other Traits: The Metapopulation Effect , 1997 .

[15]  O. Diekmann,et al.  On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations , 1990, Journal of mathematical biology.

[16]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Single-species metapopulation dynamics: A structured model , 1992 .

[17]  I. Scheuring,et al.  On the evolution of density dependent dispersal in a spatially structured population model. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  M Gyllenberg,et al.  On fitness in structured metapopulations , 2001, Journal of mathematical biology.

[19]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution : A Derivation from Stochastic Ecological Processes , 1996 .

[20]  G. Ruxton,et al.  Fitness‐dependent dispersal in metapopulations and its consequences for persistence and synchrony , 1999 .

[21]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation Dynamics: From Concepts and Observations to Predictive Models , 1997 .

[22]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Dynamics of Adaptation and Evolutionary Branching , 1997 .

[23]  Marino Gatto,et al.  Lyapunov exponents and the mathematics of invasion in oscillatory or chaotic populations , 1995 .

[24]  G. Fox,et al.  Chaos and evolution. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  O. Diekmann,et al.  On the formulation and analysis of general deterministic structured population models II. Nonlinear theory , 2000 .

[26]  Odo Diekmann,et al.  THE "CUMULATIVE" FORMULATION OF (PHYSIOLOGICALLY) STRUCTURED POPULATION MODELS , 1992 .

[27]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Two General Metapopulation Models and the Core-Satellite Species Hypothesis , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[28]  J. Travis,et al.  The evolution of density–dependent dispersal , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity , 2000 .