Performance Analysis of PMIPv6-Based NEtwork MObility for Intelligent Transportation Systems

While host mobility support for individual mobile hosts (MHs) has been widely investigated and developed over the past years, there has been relatively less attention to NEtwork MObility (NEMO). Since NEMO Basic Support (NEMO-BS) was developed, it has been the central pillar in Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) communication architectures for maintaining the vehicle's Internet connectivity. As the vehicle moves around, it attaches to a new access network and is required to register a new address obtained from the new access network to a home agent (HA). This location update of NEMO-BS often results in unacceptable long handover latency and increased traffic load to the vehicle. To address these issues, in this paper, we introduce new NEMO support protocols, which rely on mobility service provisioning entities introduced in Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6), as possible mobility support protocols for ITS. As a base protocol, we present PMIPv6-based NEMO (P-NEMO) to maintain the vehicle's Internet connectivity while moving and without participating in the location update management. In P-NEMO, the mobility management for the vehicle is supported by mobility service provisioning entities residing in a given PMIPv6 domain. To further improve handover performance, fast P-NEMO (FP-NEMO) has been developed as an extension protocol. FP-NEMO utilizes wireless L2 events to anticipate the vehicle's handovers. The mobility service provisioning entities prepare the vehicle's handover prior to the attachment of the vehicle to the new access network. Detailed handover procedures for P-NEMO and FP-NEMO are provided, and handover timing diagrams are presented to evaluate the performance of the proposed protocols. P-NEMO and FP-NEMO are compared with NEMO-BS in terms of traffic cost and handover latency.

[1]  Tai-Myung Chung,et al.  Secure handover for Proxy Mobile IPv6 in next-generation communications: scenarios and performance , 2011, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[2]  Ryuji Wakikawa,et al.  Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol , 2005, RFC.

[3]  Thierry Ernst,et al.  Network Mobility Support Terminology , 2007, RFC.

[4]  Fan Zhao,et al.  Network Mobility Route Optimization Solution Space Analysis , 2007, RFC.

[5]  Tai-Myung Chung,et al.  A comparative performance analysis on Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 and Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2009, Telecommun. Syst..

[6]  Tai-Myung Chung,et al.  Route Optimization in Nested NEMO: Classification, Evaluation, and Analysis from NEMO Fringe Stub Perspective , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[7]  Tai-Myung Chung,et al.  How much do we gain by introducing route optimization in Proxy Mobile IPv6 networks? , 2010, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[8]  Claude Castelluccia,et al.  Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) Mobility Management , 2008, RFC.

[9]  V. Nebehaj,et al.  CVIS: CALM proof of concept preliminary results , 2009, 2009 9th International Conference on Intelligent Transport Systems Telecommunications, (ITST).

[10]  Thomas Narten,et al.  IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration , 1996, RFC.

[11]  Stephen E. Deering,et al.  Generic Packet Tunneling in IPv6 Specification , 1998, RFC.

[12]  Sang-Jo Yoo,et al.  Analysis of Fast Handover Mechanisms for Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Network Mobility , 2009, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[13]  Hyung-Jin Lim,et al.  Network Mobility Basic Support within Proxy Mobile IPv6: scenarios and analysis , 2008 .

[14]  Thomas Narten,et al.  Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6) , 1996, RFC.

[15]  José Santa,et al.  Design and Experimental Evaluation of a Vehicular Network Based on NEMO and MANET , 2010, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[16]  Julien Montavont,et al.  An improved network mobility service for intelligent transportation systems , 2011, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[17]  Xiaoming Fu,et al.  Optimized FMIPv6 Using IEEE 802.21 MIH Services in Vehicular Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[18]  Basavaraj Patil,et al.  Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2008, RFC.

[19]  Frank Xia,et al.  Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2010, RFC.

[20]  Eranga Perera,et al.  Measuring and Improving the Performance of Network Mobility Management in IPv6 Networks , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[21]  Jong-Hyouk Lee,et al.  Diffie-Hellman key based authentication in proxy mobile IPv6 , 2010 .

[22]  Sung-Gi Min,et al.  Performance Analysis of Hierarchical Mobile IPv6: Does it Improve Mobile IPv6 in Terms of Handover Speed? , 2009, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[23]  Ilsun You,et al.  N-NEMO: A Comprehensive Network Mobility Solution in Proxy Mobile IPv6 Network , 2010, J. Wirel. Mob. Networks Ubiquitous Comput. Dependable Appl..

[24]  Yi-Bing Lin Reducing location update cost in a PCS network , 1996, Proceedings of PIMRC '96 - 7th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Communications.

[25]  Rajeev Koodli Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers , 2009, RFC.

[26]  Yanghee Choi,et al.  An Adaptive Network Mobility Support Protocol in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[27]  Kishor S. Trivedi Probability and Statistics with Reliability, Queuing, and Computer Science Applications , 1984 .

[28]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  An inter-system handoff technique for the IMT-2000 system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[29]  Tai-Myung Chung,et al.  Cost analysis of IP mobility management protocols for consumer mobile devices , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[30]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[31]  Arturo Azcorra,et al.  Nemo-enabled localized mobility support for internet access in automotive scenarios , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.