Analysis In Vivo of the Hemifacial Transplantation Surgical Technique

Abstract: Approximately 35 facial transplants have been performed worldwide. Many under-explored aspects of this procedure remain, some emerging as the survivors age. Human-like preclinical trial models, including swine, can be explored and developed as a foundation for subsequent studies. A previously described surgical technique for face transplantation in swine carcasses has been employed herein, evaluating its reproducibility in a live pig and the viability of the vascular pedicles. Method: Flap construction was performed according to the experimental model developed in our service. Under general anesthesia, the structures of the left hemiface of a pig were dissected. Vascular pedicles were the facial artery, caudal auricular artery, and external jugular vein. After dissection, adequate tissue perfusion of the entire explant by those pedicles was documented through vessel filling, observation of the ischemic area, and posterior reperfusion. Results: A capillary reperfusion test confirmed that the main arterial pedicle irrigating the hemiface flap was the facial artery. The same technique showed that despite divergent literary opinions on the irrigation of the auricular region, the caudal auricular artery provides the arterial supply for the external ear. Performing the surgical technique was more difficult in vivo due to the inherent complications of a live subject. Conclusion: The methodology for the facial transplant technique in swine carcasses was satisfactorily reproducible in a live animal. The main arterial pedicle responsible for flap irrigation is the facial artery, and the fact that the vessel supplying the outer ear is the caudal atrial artery was confirmed

[1]  B. Pomahac,et al.  Face transplantation—current status and future developments , 2018, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[2]  F. Bellivier,et al.  Face transplant: long-term follow-up and results of a prospective open study , 2016, The Lancet.

[3]  R. Robes,et al.  Surgical Technique of Hemi-Face Transplant: A New Model of Training , 2016, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[4]  M. Siemionow,et al.  Sheep Hemifacial and Auricular Transplantation Models: An Anatomic Study , 2014, Annals of Plastic Surgery.

[5]  I. Koshima,et al.  Development of New Composite Tissue Allotransplantation Models using supermicrosurgery:Medical Care (Immunology, Transplantation Therapy, Regenerative Medicine, Reconstructive Surgery, Health Care Economy* Welfere and Politics and Military , 2011 .

[6]  Y. Kulahci,et al.  A New Composite Hemiface/Mandible/Tongue Transplantation Model in Rats , 2010, Annals of plastic surgery.

[7]  J. Yang,et al.  Swine hemi-facial composite tissue allotransplantation: a model to study immune rejection. , 2009, The Journal of surgical research.

[8]  E. Rodriguez,et al.  A Heterotopic Primate Model for Facial Composite Tissue Transplantation , 2008, Annals of plastic surgery.

[9]  Li Yuping,et al.  Developing a Canine Model of Composite Facial/Scalp Allograft Transplantation , 2007, Annals of plastic surgery.

[10]  M. Keefe,et al.  First human face allograft: early report , 2007 .

[11]  Bernard Devauchelle,et al.  First human face allograft: early report , 2006, The Lancet.

[12]  Zhang Linxi,et al.  A Hemifacial Transplantation Model in Rabbits , 2006, Annals of plastic surgery.

[13]  P. Chardon,et al.  The major histocompatibility complex in swine , 1999, Immunological reviews.

[14]  D. Antczak Structure and function of the major histocompatibility complex in domestic animals. , 1982, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.